Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for استادشناسی دانشگاه الزهرا

Channel

استادشناسی دانشگاه الزهرا

@ostadshenasiii

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,499subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001075194009
TypeChannel
Username@ostadshenasiii
Created28 January 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ostadshenasiii

Growth

7,4997,5027,500.56 August 2026 — 7,501 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,502 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,500 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,499 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,499–7,502 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:567,499-1
10 Aug 2026, 06:177,500-2
7 Aug 2026, 04:357,502+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:187,501first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.0%
avg views ÷ 7,499 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,020
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.721%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held28 (27 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total56,690
Reactions total248
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

248 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9538.3%
👎9538.3%
3012.1%
💔2710.9%
👏10.403%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 248reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 03:32 UTC970 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#ندا_عبدالوند #مدیریت سلام دوستان وقتتون بخیر. عزیزان کسی برای پایان نامه داورش استاد عبدالوند بوده ؟چطور هستند در فرایند پایان نامه؟ اگر امکانش هست راهنمایی بفرمایید

👎4

10 Aug 2026, 00:07 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 12 August 2026

سلام میشه بزارید اگه کسی ارشد بدون سنوات مرخصی گرفته ۱ ترم رو بگه چجوری اینکارو کرده؟؟

10 Aug 2026, 00:07 UTC≈1,050 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#تفسیر_موضوعی_قرآن #میر_هادی_تفرشی سلام بچه ها اگر کسی جزوه استاد میرهادی تفرشی را دارد میشه ارسال کند.ممنون @a_h_8283

1

8 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC≈1,450 viewsread 12 August 2026

سلام بچه ها من رشتم تربیت بدنی نیست و دوره تئوری گرفتم که مدتش داره تموم میشه! اگر کسی خودش بیرون از دانشگاه داره مربیگری میگیره میشه پیام بده با هم هماهنگ کنیم؟ یا لینک گروه بچه ها تربیت بدنی رو بدید تا با یکی کانکت بشم

7 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,710 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026

سلام من معرفی به استاد برداشتم این تابستون و الان رفته برای رای شورا که میگن باید صبر کنم کی دانشگاه باز میشه که رای بیاد و اینکه آیا امکان رد شدن درخواستم هست؟ دانشکده مهندسی

7 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC≈1,680 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#الناز_خجسته من این ترم فارسی عمومی باهاشون داشتم استاد بسیار خوبی هستن و واقعا تدریس قشنگ و شیرینی دارن و اینکه هرکسی ارائه بده شعری در کلاس بخونه یا فعالیتی داشته باشه یادداشت میکنن و آخر ترم نمره میدن و یه تکلیف هم داشتیم این بود که کتابی رو به دلخواه انتخاب کنیم و خلاصه و نقدش کنیم که اینم یکی دو نمره داشت همه میگن سطح امتحانش راحته ولی بنظرم متوسط بود و تا خوب نخونی نمیتونی ۲۰ بیاری و اینکه جزوه رو میفرستن شما ب

👍18👎5👏1💔1

7 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC≈1,540 viewsread 12 August 2026

#فریبا_پات استاد خوبی هستن ولی یکم سختگیرن سر درس اما واقعا هم تدریس هم رفع اشکال خوبی دارن و اینکه میخوان شما یچیزی یاد بگیرین نه صرفا درسی رو پاس کنید باهاتون راه میان تا جایی که بشه و استاد صریح و جدی ای هستن در کل من راضی بودم و نمره خوبی گرفتم ازشون زبان تخصصی ۱ و ۲ و ۳ با ایشونه

7 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC≈1,540 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#خزعلی من هیچوقت از اون دانشجوهایی نبودم که بیخود از استادی بد بگم. ولی این استاد واقعا عجیب غریبه. اولین ترمی بود که باهاش کلاس داشتم. روش تحقیق. چون ما ارشد هستیم بهمون گفت که باید برای پایان ترم یه مقاله بنویسید تحویلم بدید. اولا که یه گروه تو بله زده بودیم و کلاساش همونجا بود. هر جلسه عین جت درس میداد و تکلیفش رو برای هفته بعد میخواست و اصلا براش مهم نبود ک تو نفهمیدی مبحث رو که بخوای تکلیفش رو انجام بدی. اصلا ه

💔231

6 Aug 2026, 21:39 UTC≈1,790 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ما گروه رو باز کردیم اگر همچنان امکان ارسال پیام نیست، بگید که‌ پیگیری کنیم

👎20👍5

6 Aug 2026, 21:38 UTC≈1,960 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026

سلام دوستان تاپیک های گروه الزهرا براتون بازن؟ @AlzahraGp

👎35👍251

3 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTC≈2,730 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

میشه درباره کارآموزی توضیح بدید . من خیلی نگرانشم سخت گیری میکنن شرکت ها برای دانشجویی که میره کارآموزی؟

4

3 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTC≈2,510 viewsread 12 August 2026

سلام وقتتون بخیر اگ لطفا میدونین هر درسی رو کدوم استاد بهتره حتی اگ یکیش رو میدونین اصول مدیریت مالی 1 اقتصاد خرد ریاضیات و کاربرد ان در مدیریت مدیریت رفتار سازمانی اصول حسابداری 2 فارسی عمومی ممنون میشم💚

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @ostadshenasiii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,232,554 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“استادشناسی دانشگاه الزهرا” (@ostadshenasiii), 7,499 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ostadshenasiii.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.