Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ОСНОВАНИЕ

Channel

ОСНОВАНИЕ

@osnovanie_kzn

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,852subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002003236747
TypeChannel
Username@osnovanie_kzn
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/osnovanie_kzn

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,8502,8682,8597 August 2026 — 2,868 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,868 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,866 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,863 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,859 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,858 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,855 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,854 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,853 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,852 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,854 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,850 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,851 subscribers19 September 2026 — 2,852 subscribers2,8527 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,847–2,871 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 14:592,852+1
15 Sept 2026, 07:372,851+1
11 Sept 2026, 10:372,850-4
6 Sept 2026, 18:162,854+2
2 Sept 2026, 03:372,852-1
30 Aug 2026, 08:572,853-1
26 Aug 2026, 22:562,854-1
24 Aug 2026, 01:092,855-3
20 Aug 2026, 04:152,858-1
16 Aug 2026, 20:372,859-4
10 Aug 2026, 18:112,863-3
7 Aug 2026, 18:572,866-2
7 Aug 2026, 13:322,868no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:222,868first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

137 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7151.8%
🔥3727.0%
👍2014.6%
👏96.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTC370 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Автор поста - врач-аллерголог Кудрявцева Софья Андреевна. Редактор поста - врач-педиатр Лутфуллин Ильдус Яудатович.

17🔥14👍6

20 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC279 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Не будем забирать хлеб у дерматологов и других смежных специалистов, поэтому с радостью расспросим особенности течения подобных реакций у них. Для настоящих душнил, братьев по разуму (🩷), желающих знать всё, прилагаю: 🤓 фото растений, вызывающих фотодерматозы, 🤓 рисунки: поражения кожи при фотодерматозах идиоматических, 🤓 рисунки: поражения кожи при фотодерматозах вторичных, 🧐 рисунки: поражения кожи при фотодермат

4

20 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC248 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Также здесь приведена «сборная таблица», сравнивающая фототоксические и фотоаллергические реакции.

7👍4👏2

20 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC220 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🤔 К фотоаллергическим реакциям относят солнечную крапивницу и фотодерматит, ассоциированный с применением ЛС или химического вещества (местный или системный варианты). В отличии от фототоксического дерматита при фотоаллергической реакции применяемое вещество еще и становится аллергеном. Реакция в отличии от фототоксической возникает не у всех, а у тех пациентов, кто к этому веществу «чувствителен».

6👍2👏2

20 Jul 2026, 12:30 UTC227 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🤔 Фототоксические реакции в свою очередь проявляются в виде: ☀️ классического солнечного ожога (солнечного дерматита), ☀️ фотофитодерматоза (или -дерматита), ☀️ фототоксического дерматита из-за ЛС или химического вещества (местного или системного). ❗️ В случае местного фототоксического дерматита поражение возникает в месте нанесения или попадания лекарственного средства или химического вещества + воздействия УФ-излу

5👍2🔥2

20 Jul 2026, 12:30 UTC219 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🤔 Интересной группой являются идиопатические фотодерматозы, так как в целом конкретные этиологические факторы (кроме солнечного света) не выявлены. К идиопатическим фотодерматозам относят: ☀️ полиморфную световую сыпь (она же полиморфный фотодерматоз, она же полиморфный фотодерматит), ☀️ ювенильную сыпь (однако в некоторых руководствах её рассматривают в рамках подтипа полиморфной световой сыпи), ☀️ актинический прур

7👍3👏2

20 Jul 2026, 12:30 UTC278 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌞🌞🌞 Фотодерматозы – обширная группа реакций фоточувствительности на солнце. При этом, как у нас в медицине часто бывает, подобные реакции не ограничиваются реакциями на растения или на приём лекарственных препаратов, а могут быть вызваны чем-то совсем неожиданным. Оказывается, проблемы фотодерматозов гораздо глубже, чем кажутся! 🤔 Резонный вопрос: почему об этом пишет аллерголог? А потому, что подобные реакции часто

9🔥4👍3

19 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTC390 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Завтра у нас большой "летний" материал - фотодерматозы. Автор подробного обзора проблемы - врач-аллерголог Кудрявцева Софья Андреевна. Что может быть причиной фотодерматоза? Какие они бывают? Опасно ли рвать листики растений, проходя мимо?

13🔥10👏3

19 Jul 2026, 17:46 UTC401 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Чем интересны эти растения врачу?

  1. Они вызывают фотодерматозы77%
  2. Все они ядовиты при приёме внутрь даже маленькой порции20%
  3. Они подходят для приготовления целебных отваров3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Jul 2026, 17:46 UTC376 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Итак, это:

  1. Борщевик Сосновского95%
  2. Пастернак посевной1%
  3. Сельдерей пахучий0%
  4. Фенхель обыкновенный4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @osnovanie_kzn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 17:46 UTCAnonymous Quiz129 voters

Чем интересны эти растения врачу?

  1. Они вызывают фотодерматозы77%
  2. Все они ядовиты при приёме внутрь даже маленькой порции20%
  3. Они подходят для приготовления целебных отваров3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Jul 2026, 17:46 UTCAnonymous Quiz139 voters

Итак, это:

  1. Борщевик Сосновского95%
  2. Пастернак посевной1%
  3. Сельдерей пахучий0%
  4. Фенхель обыкновенный4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Jul 2026, 17:46 UTCAnonymous Quiz107 voters

Итак, это:

  1. Плющ ядовитый68%
  2. Манго тропическое1%
  3. Анакардиака истинная5%
  4. Антрискус лесной26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Jul 2026, 17:46 UTCAnonymous Quiz120 voters

Итак, это:

  1. Марь обыкновенная16%
  2. Плющ ядовитый8%
  3. Лебеда зеленая68%
  4. Крапива двудомная8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 20 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Доктор Неешпапа 🫁 /doctor_neeshpapa/
@doctor_neeshpapa · 32,035
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
Юлия Сидорова |Детский эндокринолог|
@sidorovasay · 26,787
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ОСНОВАНИЕ” (@osnovanie_kzn), 2,852 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/osnovanie_kzn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.