📖 Канал для влюблённых в литературу.
«Парадокс чтения: оно уводит нас от реальности, чтобы наполнить реальность смыслом». Д. Пеннак
Для связи: @gtsmad
Реклама: https://telega.in/c/osmyslen
Регистрация РКН: vk.cc/cFIa5O
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,553–12,572 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 17:46
12,555
-3
13 Aug 2026, 07:53
12,558
-3
12 Aug 2026, 07:24
12,561
-3
11 Aug 2026, 03:49
12,564
-2
10 Aug 2026, 05:33
12,566
+1
9 Aug 2026, 03:52
12,565
-5
8 Aug 2026, 04:14
12,570
+1
7 Aug 2026, 11:45
12,569
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:38
12,569
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 12,555 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026
Posts held
17 (6 June 2026 – 18 July 2026)
Views total
2,540
Reactions total
94
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 00:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,200
Videos
≈64
Links
≈639
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
644 reactions across 17 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
165
25.6%
😁
121
18.8%
❤
111
17.2%
🤣
74
11.5%
🔥
58
9.01%
💯
45
6.99%
custom 5368812559992393128
19
2.95%
🤝
15
2.33%
🥰
8
1.24%
👎
6
0.932%
👏
6
0.932%
✍
4
0.621%
👌
4
0.621%
⚡
3
0.466%
🗿
1
0.155%
😍
1
0.155%
😐
1
0.155%
😢
1
0.155%
🤯
1
0.155%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 644reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«Corpus» выпустит «Имя розы» Умберто Эко в веселой обложке.
Аннотация:
Графическая адаптация главного шедевра Умберто Эко — работа классика итальянской графики, великого современного художника Мило Манары. Сюжет "Имени розы" известен: конец ноября 1327 года, монах-
францисканец Вильгельм Баскервильский и его юный ученик, Адсон Мелькский, расследуют загадочные смерти в уединенном бенедиктинском монастыре. Увлекательн…
Развернул на полках книги мордой к стенке, чтобы не отвлекали от английского языка. Теперь читаю на скорости отстающего первоклассника вторую (уже вторую!) книгу злоключений Гарри Поттера. Получается всего 5–10 стр/час. Радуюсь, когда на странице встречается всего одно-два незнакомых или забытых слова. Но чаще приходится текст пережевывать и выписывать слова в тетрадку. Начинать учить английский после сорока — тот ещ…
«Одиссея»,Гомер
(да-да, я тоже перед фильмом решила прочитать)
Ожидание: много мудрых мыслей, философские размышления
Реальность: ПРИКЛЮЧЕНИЯ + КРОВИЩА
Ожидание:
нечитабельный текст, через который с трудом продираешься
Реальность: к стилю быстро привыкаешь и потом просто слушаешь и кайфуешь
Ожидание: ничего не понятно
Реальность: даже то, что непонятно, не мешает понять именно саму историю. А детали да, непонятны
…
#скоро
Фантастический Гюстав Доре. Аликс Паре, Валери Сюёр-Эрме
Аннотация:
Творческая биография классика ХIХ века Гюстава Доре – гравера, иллюстратора, карикатуриста, скульптора с изысканными репродукциями, которые позволяют в полной мере оценить мастерство художника.
От Библии до Шекспира, от Бальзака до Мильтона, от Сервантеса до По — замысловатые, романтичные, точные и яркие рисунки Гюстава Доре оживляли великие…
Делаю вид, что читаю «Поминки по Финнегану» Джеймса нашего Джойса. Появилось две ассоциации:
1. «Гло́кая ку́здра ште́ко будлану́ла бо́кра и курдя́чит бокрёнка».
2. И французская комедия «Bienvenue chez les Ch’tis» («Бобро поржаловать!»).
Прочитал «Похороны Патрика Дигнэма» — отрывок из «Улисса» Джеймса Джойса в переводе Валентина Стенича. Жаль, что переводчик приложил руку только к трём эпизодам романа (4-6). Читать было любопытно. Правда, из текста исчез «хореглазый свинопродавец» и уже никого не «метемпсихозят», зато появилась «епитрахиль». Теперь хочу после «Самой опасной книги» Бирмингема доперечитать «Улисса».
P.S. «Похороны Патрика Дигнэма» (е…
Издательство «Опустошитель» частично опустошит кошельки читателей Сэмюэля Беккета. Уже в июле ждем роман «Мерсье и Камье». Сразу в двух вариантах: перевод с французской версии 1946 года и с английской 1947.
320 страниц.
Когда решаешь не покупать новые книги в этом году, приходят такие анонсы:
#скоро в издательстве Астрель:
Всё и даже больше. Компактная история бесконечности. Дэвид Фостер Уоллес
Аннотация:
Краткая и понятная история одной из наиболее абстрактных и завораживающих математических концепций.
С античных времен ее природа не давала покоя математикам и философам. Реальна ли бесконечность? Или она — лишь бессмысленная абс…
Ричард Эллманн — равноправный участник того, что мы сейчас ощущаем слыша имя "Джеймс Джойс". Джойс написал гениальные книги, а Эллманн гениально открыл автора и его тексты миру.
Библия всех биографий выйдет в нашем издательстве этой зимой.
"Если бы кто-то стоял рядом с Джойсом у писсуара, Эллманн и у него бы взял интервью".
Всех с Блумсдеем!
❤13👍10custom 53688125599923931286🤝2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @osmyslen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 18 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Классические книги @freeclassicbooks · 112,142 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
Книжный Вестник @duosoft_books · 119,398 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Смысл | Книги” (@osmyslen), 12,555 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/osmyslen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.