Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Army Intelligence X Osint

@osintbrowzer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

19subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002352878811
TypeChannel
Username@osintbrowzer
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/osintbrowzer

Growth

197 August 2026 — 19 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18–20 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 17:0119no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:5519first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
8
Links
40

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5074.6%
🔥811.9%
🥰68.96%
❤‍🔥34.48%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2025 to 31 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Oct 2025, 06:53 UTC72 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Digital Image Forensics: A quantitative & qualitative comparison between State-of-the-art-AI and Traditional Techniques for detection and localization of image manipulations link pdf Thesis with practical examples and thoughtful analysis for using the "JPEG Ghosts", "Image Resampling" and "Noise Wavelet Blocking" tools implemented in Sherloq. This work also offers insights towards the use and reliability of AI driven

3

21 Oct 2025, 21:16 UTC79 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

A Picture's Worth: Digital Image Analysis and Forensics LINK by Neal Krawetz Paper with practical examples and thoughtful analysis for techniques that have since been implemented in Sherloq

2🔥1🥰1

20 Oct 2025, 20:53 UTC82 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

GrapheneOS is finally ready to break free from Pixels, and it may never look back link - The makers of GrapheneOS have confirmed they are partnering with a major Android OEM to bring the privacy-focused Android fork to Snapdragon-powered smartphones. - The project has confirmed it’s bringing support for Pixel 10, but is unsure whether support will continue for Pixel 11. - GrapheneOS didn’t reveal the name of its new

4🔥1🥰1

19 Oct 2025, 07:31 UTC74 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026

21 Best Threat Intelligence Platforms (2025 Guide) link Security teams today face overwhelming volumes of raw threat data across the surface, deep, and dark web, making it harder to identify real risks. Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIPs) are essential because they aggregate, enrich, and prioritize this data into actionable intelligence, integrate with existing security systems (like SIEM, SOAR, and EDR), and help a

5❤‍🔥3🔥3

18 Oct 2025, 16:11 UTC91 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Debriefing di un Cuore Spezzato: La Recensione di “Guerra Cognitiva Sentimentale” https://osintops.com/debriefing-di-un-cuore-spezzato-la-recensione-di-guerra-cognitiva-sentimentale/ La più comune deformazione professionale di un analista d’intelligence è il mettersi ad analizzare tutto, relazioni sentimentali comprese. Guerra Cognitiva Sentimentale di Astore dei Boschi parte proprio da questo assunto, analizzando un

5🥰4🔥3

1 Sept 2025, 16:37 UTC113 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Week in OSINT #2025-01 - sector035 - Intelligence Disciplines Link Ritu Gill shared an article over at OSINT Team about all types of intelligence gathering, of which OSINT, or open source intelligence, is just one of the many. They explain different disciplines, and explain their use case, and have a short bit of history about each one. An interesting blog, for people that don't know about the different aspects of

1

28 Jul 2025, 08:42 UTC230 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Week in OSINT #2025 - 28 - sector035 - Phone Numbers Link Via a tweet by Cyb_detective, I discovered a page over on the web site of OH SHINT!. The page is dedicated to phone numbers, reverse searches, general phone books, and even has a few country phone books listed already. It is a work in progress, and this is something I have been wanting to do myself too some time ago. But when I still had my links on this web

3

8 Jul 2025, 04:29 UTC244 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

bitchat link - Decentralized Mesh Network: Automatic peer discovery and multi-hop message relay over Bluetooth LE - End-to-End Encryption: X25519 key exchange + AES-256-GCM for private messages - Room-Based Chats: Topic-based group messaging with optional password protection - Store & Forward: Messages cached for offline peers and delivered when they reconnect - Privacy First: No accounts, no phone numbers, no persis

5

27 Jun 2025, 21:23 UTC213 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Week in OSINT #2025-28 - sector035 - Earthkit GitHub Link Several weeks ago I was sent a link to the GitHub repo of "earthkit", after which I tried to get it up and running locally. I didn't have enough time to solve some bugs I encountered, and I left it for what it was. But when Cyb_detective mentioned it again last week, accompanied by a web-based version, I had to play with it again! This is a one-stop solution

4

21 Jun 2025, 08:09 UTC213 viewsread 11 August 2026

Blockchain OSINT resources link A collection of tools and resources useful for OSINT investigations in the cryptocurrency. This is a dynamic list. most resources here are from investigations I've done. - Blockchain Explorers - Crypto OSINT Analysis & Learning - APIs & Data Sources - Compliance, Risk, & AML Resources - Learning Resources - Investigation Workflows from cybdetective

17 Jun 2025, 10:58 UTC183 viewsread 11 August 2026

Week in OSINT #2025 Sector035 - Virtual Tours Patrick Dunlop wrote an article on something I've never seen before, and I didn't even know it was a big thing: Virtual tours of houses. He shows how easy it is to get a true insight of homes that are or were up for sale, and do some recon on the physical location. I can imagine roaming around a skyscraper in New York to get an insight in the layout, or a house that used

8 Jun 2025, 18:50 UTC197 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

What It’s Like to Get Doxed for Taking a Bike Ride Peter Weinberg didn’t even know what “doxing” was before a Twitter mob falsely accused him of assaulting some kids on a bike trail https://medium.com/new-york-magazine/what-its-like-to-get-doxed-for-taking-a-bike-ride-652b254c7f71

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @osintbrowzer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Army Intelligence X Osint” (@osintbrowzer), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/osintbrowzer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.