Channel
@osce_uz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
46subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003577942896 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @osce_uz |
| Description | Birgalikda intizom quramiz! |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 19 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/osce_uz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 46 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 46 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 19 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (19 February 2026 – 23 July 2026) |
| Views total | 802 |
| Reactions total | 15 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
41 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 73.2% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 7.32% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 7.32% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
OSCE'da shu paytgacha faqatgina 15, 30-kunlik chellenjlar qilar edik. O'tkazib yuborilgan kunga esa jarima puli yozilardi, va oxirida to'plangan summa ehson uchun ishlatilardi. Asosiy maqsad – intizomni birgalikda ushlab turish va yangi odatni shakllantirish edi. Shubhasiz, tez orada yangi mavsumga start beramiz. Lekin, yuqoridagi intizom dasturidan tashqari talabalar uchun yangi bir dastur ham ishlab chiqayapmiz…
❤6⚡2
Comeback 🤫🤫
🔥3🫡3😎1
Assalomu alekum everyone! So far, we had 5 cycles, around 50 participants and 990,000 UZS donation. We are about to start again only if you are ready to join us and spend your summer wisely! Are you ready to join us?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🆒2
Cycle 5 — Only One Day You can join only tomorrow. After that, the next entry days are strictly on: 10th, and 15th day of the cycle. If you miss it now, then you will wait If you are serious about: 1. building discipline 2. staying consistent 3. producing valuable results This is your time to take the chance and work on yourself with like minded people around you! OSCE — One Step Closer Everyday.
Hello Dears, Reminder: April 7 is the last day for registration for our upcoming cycle!
❤1
OSCE pinned «📢 OSCE — Cycle 5 Applications Open Applications for OSCE Cycle 5 are now open! This is a discipline-based program focused on consistency, accountability, and real progress. 🔹 What to expect • Daily habit tracking • Clear personal plan (2–4 habits) • Public…»
“Discipline is doing what you hate to do, but nonetheless doing it like you love it.” — Mike Tyson You don’t lack knowledge. You lack the ability to act when it’s uncomfortable. Everyone can work when they feel good. Very few can work when they don’t. That’s the difference. OSCE - One Step Closer Everyday
❤1
📢 OSCE — Cycle 5 Applications Open Applications for OSCE Cycle 5 are now open! This is a discipline-based program focused on consistency, accountability, and real progress. 🔹 What to expect • Daily habit tracking • Clear personal plan (2–4 habits) • Public accountability • Financial penalties for missed days 🔹 Rules • Missed/Late day: 5,000 UZS • Payments must be completed within 24 hours 🔹 Last Cycle Results …
❤2
OSCE — Ramadan Cycle Completed While many people slowed down during Ramadan, OSCE members chose a different approach. They did not pause. They did not wait. They used this time to become more disciplined. Cycle Summary: • 7 members completed the cycle • 26 missed days in total • 250,000 UZS collected (Ramadan cycle) • 480,000 UZS collected across both cycles All funds will be allocated transparently. Ramadan …
❤1
OSCE | Discipline is Built, Not Born Many people think discipline is something you either have or don’t. In reality, it is something you build deliberately. Here are 5 foundations that every disciplined person develops: 1. Define your “why” Without a reason, consistency disappears after a few days. Your “why” is what keeps you going when motivation disappears. Think of it as insurance for your discipline. 2. B…
❤3
OSCE Intensive Program — Applications Open Applications for the OSCE Intensive Program are now officially open! This is a 15-day high-discipline cycle for members who are ready for structured transformation. Before applying, understand: • You must choose 3–5 measurable core habits • You must cover inner growth, physical, and intellectual/career development • Missed day: 20,000 UZS • Late report: 10,000 UZS • 60,0…
❤3
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit. " © Will Durant (summarizing Aristotle) OSCE - Challenge yourself
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @osce_uz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Assalomu alekum everyone! So far, we had 5 cycles, around 50 participants and 990,000 UZS donation. We are about to start again only if you are ready to join us and spend your summer wisely! Are you ready to join us?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 23 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 756,292 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OSCE” (@osce_uz), 46 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/osce_uz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.