Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ОРсКаЯ КуХнЯ

Channel

ОРсКаЯ КуХнЯ

@orskaykuxnya

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,363subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001435000280
TypeChannel
Username@orskaykuxnya
Created8 February 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/orskaykuxnya

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,3431,3631,3536 August 2026 — 1,343 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,343 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,344 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,345 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,346 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,344 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,346 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,347 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,348 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,353 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,352 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,355 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,356 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,357 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,363 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,340–1,366 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:581,363+6
14 Sept 2026, 03:171,357+1
10 Sept 2026, 08:371,356+1
4 Sept 2026, 23:581,355+3
1 Sept 2026, 18:061,352-1
29 Aug 2026, 11:161,353+5
26 Aug 2026, 14:431,348+1
23 Aug 2026, 19:461,347+1
20 Aug 2026, 01:321,346+2
16 Aug 2026, 15:121,344-2
13 Aug 2026, 01:341,346+1
10 Aug 2026, 01:131,345+1
7 Aug 2026, 04:461,344+1
6 Aug 2026, 11:501,343no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:461,343first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

52 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1121.2%
🤣1019.2%
🔥815.4%
🤡611.5%
59.62%
😁59.62%
💯47.69%
👏11.92%
💩11.92%
🤬11.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @orskaykuxnya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC117 views0 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Фокусники какие-то. Как они это сделали? Едро на первом месте, а КПРФ среди спойлеров оказался...

4 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC150 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ecotoporPhoto

Владимир Путин улетел из Красноярска и цены на бензин резко подняли. Топливо подорожало на 24 рубля за минуту. Накануне приезда президента России цены снизились ровно на ту же сумму. @ecotopor

🤣3🤬1

4 Aug 2026, 06:36 UTC176 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @bezposhady

Жители Красноярска просят Путина побыть в городе подольше, потому что к его приезду бензин стал дешевле на 24 рубля. @bezposhady

😁5

4 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC136 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ural56ru

Остановочный павильон на «Ул. Малишевского» в Орске установят... в течение 9 лет Сейчас точка остановки транспорта не только не оборудована павильоном, но и не имеет каких-либо ограждений. Сама же пешеходная зона никак не обустроена, сообщают жители. — Остановка трамвая «ул. Малишевского», да и автобусная. Ни ограждений, ни укрыться от дождя. Что в сторону вокзала, что в сторону города. Чтоб на светофоре пройти до

🤡1

2 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC221 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Хотите очень острый и сенсационный пост, который всколыхнет все общество и из-за которого меня точно посадят? Да знаю, конечно хотите. Но не получите. Фик вам... Вы и сами все знаете...

👍5

1 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC229 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ой, да ладно. Сколько можно выкладывать информацию, не соответствующую действительности. Мы уверены, что при средней официальной заработной плате большинство россиян больше всего переживают о способах инвестиций своих накоплений, о дешёвом долларе. Кто-то переживает, что в сентябре единороссы массово проиграют на выборах, после чего о развитии малых городов придется забыть. Трамп пернул на похоронах - очень тревожно

💯4🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC213 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Кто-то может мне подсказать, что сложного в том, чтобы провести контроль выполнения, элементарной задачи. Вы каждый день в своей администрации утром проезжаете мимо этого колодца на работу и не замечаете проблемы. Неужели у сотрудников Орской мэрии так сильно замылился взгляд, что им уже, по сути, стало все равно, что же там происходит за стенами администрации? Лично по мне, этот колодец можно считать самым серьёзным

👍31

1 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC197 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @YuristBoldyrevPhoto

🆘👆🫣МНЕ ПИШУТ: Не могла себе приставить, что в туалете на строительство которого потратили десятки миллионов рублей, дверь запирается изнутри, на самодельный крючок.

1

1 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC149 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ural56ruPhoto

«Драма» четырехлетней давности: Администрация Орска пообещала решить проблему с «утопленным» колодцем в центре города, но когда - неизвестно ▪️История началась в 2022 году, когда подрядчик ООО «Союзстрой» отремонтировал участок проспекта Ленина, но не поднял колодец до уровня полотна, из-за чего образовалась яма. Администрация отправляла обращения в РВК-Орск, ссылаясь на принадлежность колодца водоканалу, а водокан

30 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC262 viewsread 6 August 2026

👆👆👆Полностью поддерживаем наш избирком, но только в, одной части. Считаем, что правоохранителям действительно надо провести проверку на основании статьи в СМИ. В ходе этой проверки надо дать четкие ответы на вопросы: -являлись ли документы настоящими или поддельными; -правильно ли экспертиза подтвердила, что подписи во многих листах бюллетеней ставились одним человеком;. -кто этот человек, который слил документацию и

30 Jul 2026, 13:49 UTC176 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ruorsk

Posted without readable text

👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @orskaykuxnya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Урал56.Ру | Оренбург, Орск
@ural56ru · 151,522
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 14 August 2026
НЕОБЪЯСНИМО, НО ФАКТ
@neobyasnimofact · 23,058
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 September 2026
Денис Паслер
@DVPasler · 66,182
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
Вести Оренбуржья
@gtrkorenburg · 34,287
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
Бизнес Личность
@Business_lichnost · 24,784
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 September 2026
Родное Оренбуржье
@glavnoe56 · 29,823
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ОРсКаЯ КуХнЯ” (@orskaykuxnya), 1,363 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orskaykuxnya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.