Channel
@orlov109
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
1,186subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002554904201 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @orlov109 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/orlov109 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 1,186 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:22 | 1,187 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:20 | 1,188 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:19 | 1,188 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
261 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 103 | 39.5% | |
| 👍 | 77 | 29.5% | |
| ❤ | 72 | 27.6% | |
| 🆒 | 8 | 3.07% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.383% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 261reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья, сегодня состоялось очередное заседание по ключевой ставке — и что же оно нам принесло? Ставка теперь составляет 14,25% годовых — снизили на 25 б.п. Как вам? Вселяет оптимизм? orlov109✍️ГК Зерно✍️Навигация
🔥6❤3👍2👎1
Мы продолжаем нашу серию подкастов — и переходим от искусства к бизнесу. Мой сегодняшний собеседник — Борис Рубцов, руководитель проектов одного крупного федерального девелопера. О чем же мы поговорили: • Какой дорогой приходят к домостроению? • Чем постройка музея отличается от проектов по реновации? • Живет ли руководитель в Дне сурка? • Чего ждать от московского рынка? • Обнаглели ли застройщики? • До РНС за год …
❤6👍5🔥4
С Днем России! Пусть будет больше поводов для спокойствия, уверенности и хороших дел.
❤7🔥4🆒2
Ну что, друзья, мы продолжаем нашу серию подкастов — и возвращаемся от технарей к людям искусства. Сегодня говорим с медиахудожником Степаном Терещенко. Посмотреть на его работы можно здесь: Instagram , сайт, VK, TГ. О чем? • Сколько существует реальностей? • Технология — это мифология? • Как создать свою вселенную, не привлекая внимания санитаров? •Что такое гиперсеть и при чем тут мост? • Искусство — это коллаб с …
🔥6👍3❤2
Как говорят блогеры, «меня часто спрашивают»... Но вы реально спрашиваете, поэтому отвечаю 😎 Почему я решил построить дом именно в Москве? Давайте я в качестве ответа просто покажу вам мозаику на Ленинградском вокзале. Там изображены Питер и Москва. На питерской части — сплошь исторические здания, где-то в углу — Лахта и кораблик с «Алых парусов». А на московской — и Сити, и Бадаевский, и Дворец Винер, и много чего …
❤9🔥5👍3
Video message, posted without a caption
👍7🔥7🆒3
👋 Мне стали часто попадаться видео, где различные участники рынка недвижимости уничтожают девелоперские проекты. Где-то, возможно, это заслуженно, где-то — чисто заказуха, либо просто ради хайпа... 🤨 Вот пример — Саввинская, 27 от Level Group: критики сняли видео дворового фасада и сравнивают его с продажными рендерами... Что? Ну камон... Я вот на днях как раз проезжал мимо: посмотрел сам и снял вам небольшое видео…
👍10🔥6❤4
Друзья, вы помните мои посты про ФЗП и насколько важно разумное зонироврние в планировках. Но все это было разработано на основе общения с застройщиками. Поэтому мы снова пошли приставать к людям на улицах и спрашивать про житье-бытье в современных ЖК. Спрашивали про то, как планировка влияет на выбор жилья, как она меняет жизненные сценарии, какие есть пожелания — и как выглядят квартира мечты. Угадайте, кстати,…
👍6❤3🔥3
Я продолжаю постигать Дзен и его форматы — и заодно вспоминаю, как вообще оказался в этой точке 😎 Выложил первую статью — поддержите лайком и парой слов в комментах. Друзья, для продвижения на этой площадке, нужно собрать первых подписчиков, поэтому подписывайтесь, не стесняйтесь. Буду очень признателен🙏 Хоть тут все работает без трех весёлых букв... orlov109✍️ГК Зерно✍️Навигация
👍7❤6🔥3
Друзья, поздравляю всех с Днем Победы! Давайте сегодня вспомним и поблагодарим тех, без кого мы не смогли бы работать, создавать, планировать — и просто жить. Любой наш проект сегодня возможен только потому, что тогда они сражались и победили. Поэтому давайте, помня о них, строить лучший мир — не только сегодня, но и каждый день. С праздником!
❤10🔥5👍3
Итак, сколько осталось нам, проектировщикам?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Помните пост про то, что нейронки скоро заменят визуализаторов? Так вот, не только их! Антропик выпустил интеграцию Клода для Автодеска. Говорят, умеет он реально много: создавать 3D-модели по описанию, делать редактируемые параметрические CAD-модели, вносить изменения в проекты, в том числе с голоса… Интересно будет посмотреть и протестировать 🧐 А вы пока поделитесь мнением в опросе ниже — сколько еще профессия п…
❤4👍3🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @orlov109. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Итак, сколько осталось нам, проектировщикам?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто куда?
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 19 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 186,826 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Данил Орлов | История Девелопера” (@orlov109), 1,186 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orlov109.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.