Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SPILL PARA BAJINGAN SCAM

Channel

SPILL PARA BAJINGAN SCAM

@orgorgbrengsek

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004410252331
TypeChannel
Username@orgorgbrengsek
Created10 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/orgorgbrengsek

Growth

121.510 August 2026 — 1 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2 subscribers10 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1–2 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 10:172+1
15 Aug 2026, 07:461no change
10 Aug 2026, 10:451first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 10 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3675.0%
avg views ÷ 2 subscribers
Avg views / post
73.5
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held5 (10 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total294
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC39 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

👤 ⁣8542356278 ⁣👦🏻 👣 ⁣🌐 @mamimuhe 🇮🇩 Indonesian 🕑 Updated at 10/08/2026 BUKAN MASALAH NOMINAL TAPI MASALAH TANGGUNGJAWAB! aku ikhlas bgt dgn nominal segitu, tapi kalo kayak gini namanya h&r gasih? aku udh coba reminder buat pay, tapi ternyata NO RESPON & chat aku cuma di READ sama dia.

10 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC96 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

id penipu : @MONAKbO id ch : @whiteferrariie numeric id si penipu : 8899325013 payment : 0895330049420 dana kronologi : jadi awalnya tuh dia minta convert saldo, dia maksa aku buat pake nomer aja & gamau qris padahal katanya spay dia prem (dari sini udah ngerasa janggal) tapi karna kebetulan hari itu juga lagi banyak promosi jasa cv aku di base” rasa curiga aku berkurang, yaudahlah aku kasih nomer spay aku, dia send

10 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC96 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

id penipu : @seserenecal numeric id si penipu : 5554763443 ⁣kronologi : aku open order jasa shopee vip, terus dia hit aku buat order shopee food dengan metode pembayaran COD. karna awalnya akun nya meyakinkan yaudah aku ga curiga samsek. pas aku kabarin kalo driver nya udah sampe, dia langsung clear chat. sumpah jahat bgt mana posisi nya tengah malem dan driver nya ibu-ibu:). dia sempet lepas id, pas aku cek hari i

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @orgorgbrengsek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,070,784 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SPILL PARA BAJINGAN SCAM” (@orgorgbrengsek), 2 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orgorgbrengsek.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.