Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ORGOGLIO.MILANESE ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ

Channel

ORGOGLIO.MILANESE ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ

@orgogliomilanese

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

2,349subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ€“3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001247439271
TypeChannel
Username@orgogliomilanese
Created22 January 2019 โ€” measured โ€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/orgogliomilanese

Growth

2,3492,3692,3597 August 2026 โ€” 2,369 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 2,369 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 2,366 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 2,364 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 2,362 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 2,359 subscribers23 August 2026 โ€” 2,355 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 2,354 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 2,353 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 2,349 subscribers7 August 20261 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 25 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 2,346โ€“2,372 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 15:422,349-4
29 Aug 2026, 08:112,353-1
26 Aug 2026, 05:122,354-1
23 Aug 2026, 08:382,355-4
20 Aug 2026, 05:352,359-3
17 Aug 2026, 10:252,362-2
13 Aug 2026, 13:472,364-2
10 Aug 2026, 21:512,366-3
7 Aug 2026, 20:172,369no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:562,369first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 9 February 2022 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

181 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ‘5731.5%
๐Ÿคฎ4726.0%
๐Ÿคฏ2714.9%
๐Ÿค”189.94%
๐Ÿ˜ข116.08%
๐Ÿ‘105.52%
๐Ÿ˜ฑ52.76%
๐Ÿ˜21.10%
๐Ÿ™21.10%
๐Ÿ‘Ž10.552%
๐Ÿคฉ10.552%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 181 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2022 to 24 February 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Feb 2022, 22:52 UTCโ‰ˆ8,430 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

โš ๏ธโš ๏ธ ATTENZIONE: non posso piรน parlare di Milano perchรฉ c'รจ la guerra in Ucraina e quindi non c'รจ tempo per parlare di altro! Mi spiace a tutti...

๐Ÿ‘14๐Ÿ˜ข11๐Ÿ™2

21 Feb 2022, 13:59 UTCviews โ€”

ORGOGLIO.MILANESE ๐Ÿด pinned ยซVOGLIAMO PIร™ SICUREZZA A MILANO ๐Ÿ”ด FIRMA SUBITO LA PETIZIONE: ๐Ÿ”ด change.org/unamilanosicura โœ…๏ธ Condividi con tutti (anche sulle storie) Insieme vinciamo.ยป

21 Feb 2022, 13:59 UTCโ‰ˆ6,100 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

VOGLIAMO PIร™ SICUREZZA A MILANO ๐Ÿ”ด FIRMA SUBITO LA PETIZIONE: ๐Ÿ”ด change.org/unamilanosicura โœ…๏ธ Condividi con tutti (anche sulle storie) Insieme vinciamo.

๐Ÿ‘16๐Ÿ‘3

21 Feb 2022, 10:10 UTCโ‰ˆ4,780 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ‘7

20 Feb 2022, 11:26 UTCโ‰ˆ3,220 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿค”8๐Ÿ‘6๐Ÿ‘Ž1

15 Feb 2022, 19:00 UTCโ‰ˆ3,720 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ne parla con l'Adnkronos il vicepresidente del Centro Studi Livatino e magistrato di Corte di Cassazione, Alfredo Mantovano, che spiega: "L'eutanasia chiama in causa una condizione di malattia o grave disagio psico fisico della persona, quello che invece rileva questo referendum รจ esclusivamente il consenso del diretto interessato, che potrebbe essere anche una persona in ottima salute che abbia chiesto o acconsentitโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘4

15 Feb 2022, 18:47 UTCโ‰ˆ3,080 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @youtrend

๐Ÿ”ด BREAKING La Corte Costituzionale ha giudicato INAMMISSIBILE il referendum sullโ€™eutanasia legale

๐Ÿคฎ47๐Ÿ‘7๐Ÿค”7๐Ÿคฉ1

14 Feb 2022, 15:21 UTCโ‰ˆ3,130 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Bellissimo gli zanza sotto ai commenti dell'ultimo post che si sentono offesi hahahah Sono un po' fragili poverini

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @orgogliomilanese. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œORGOGLIO.MILANESE ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟโ€ (@orgogliomilanese), 2,349 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orgogliomilanese.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.