Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Órfãos do Epifania (Canal)

Channel

Órfãos do Epifania (Canal)

@orfaosdoepifania

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,980subscribers

-55 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001930239494
TypeChannel
Username@orfaosdoepifania
Created26 May 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/orfaosdoepifania

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,9775,0355,0067 August 2026 — 5,035 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,035 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,031 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,022 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,028 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,019 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,997 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,990 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,982 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,983 subscribers5 September 2026 — 4,980 subscribers10 September 2026 — 4,984 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4,977 subscribers18 September 2026 — 4,980 subscribers4,9807 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,968–5,044 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 18:194,980+3
14 Sept 2026, 13:014,977-7
10 Sept 2026, 21:574,984+4
5 Sept 2026, 19:194,980-3
1 Sept 2026, 23:174,983+1
30 Aug 2026, 02:074,982-8
26 Aug 2026, 16:534,990-7
23 Aug 2026, 13:364,997-22
19 Aug 2026, 18:275,019-9
16 Aug 2026, 08:575,028+6
13 Aug 2026, 05:565,022-9
10 Aug 2026, 07:105,031-4
7 Aug 2026, 11:315,035no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:225,035first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 50 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 35s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

651 reactions across 48 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁23335.8%
🤣12519.2%
🗿7411.4%
274.15%
💊253.84%
🤡243.69%
💩233.53%
🖕223.38%
🦄203.07%
🤯172.61%
😢162.46%
🍌152.30%
🤮81.23%
🔥50.768%
🕊30.461%
👻20.307%
🤔20.307%
🤷‍♂20.307%
🥰20.307%
🌭10.154%
5 further kinds50.768%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 651 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 01:11 UTC94 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Geração Z está ouvindo o canal do Epi

🤣18

11 Aug 2026, 22:56 UTC≈1,120 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Muié narrando jogo de muié

🤣10🤮6😁2

Signed Angel Eyes "The Bad"

11 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC145 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @fazuelyPhoto

Suicídio da adolescente de 13 anos em Naviraí (MS), caso citado por Janja ao defender a proibição do Discord, teria ocorrido, na verdade, durante uma chamada no Instagram. O conteúdo teria sido retransmitido posteriormente no Discord e em diversas outras redes sociais, diz a jornalista Carla Albuquerque. Tudo nesse país é feito na base do achismo.

😁10

11 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC172 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @fazuelyVideo

Haddad Só apanhou.

🗿10

10 Aug 2026, 23:25 UTC285 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Agora me digam se o contrário é possível 🤡

😁5

Signed Espin7 <_%

10 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC309 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Prestem atenção como esse vídeo é satânico, inclusive analisem o final do vídeo. Homem normalizando isso é o pior tipo.

🖕64

Signed Espin7 <_%

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @orfaosdoepifania. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Crypto BlaBlaBla 👌
@Crypto_BlaBlaBla · 82,633
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Órfãos do Epifania (Canal)” (@orfaosdoepifania), 4,980 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orfaosdoepifania.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.