Channel
@orbitadigest
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
10,037subscribers
+108 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001178965633 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @orbitadigest |
| Description | Невероятно огромный, безмерно загадочный🔭 Космос |
| Created | 15 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/orbitadigest |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 10,037 | +10 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 10,027 | +104 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 9,923 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 9,934 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 9,929 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 9,929 | first reading |
37 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (30 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 26,275 |
| Reactions total | 639 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
639 reactions across 37 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 198 | 31.0% | |
| ❤ | 132 | 20.7% | |
| 🔥 | 99 | 15.5% | |
| 🤯 | 55 | 8.61% | |
| 👎 | 45 | 7.04% | |
| 😱 | 38 | 5.95% | |
| 🥰 | 31 | 4.85% | |
| 👏 | 27 | 4.23% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 1.41% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 0.782% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 639reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Илон Маск показал, как будет выглядеть его завод по производству чипов для ИИ. Это не космический корабль, а Terafab — фабрика по производству чипов для ИИ, которую строят Tesla, SpaceX и Intel. Все этапы выпуска чипов будут объединены под одной крышей, а мощность завода превысит 1 тераватт AI-вычислений в год. Выглядит как база злодея из фильма про Джеймса Бонда. Орбита 🌎
👍3👎1🔥1🤯1
Трамп опубликовал новую партию секретных файлов о НЛО — в них есть отчёт пилота, который в 2002 году зафиксировал гигантский 500-футовый треугольник над американской базой. Объект был размером с футбольное поле и при этом абсолютно бесшумным. В новых документах также упоминается загадочное тело с непонятными надписями, обнаруженное в Бразилии в 1963 году. Подробнее Орбита 🌎
🤯8👏3😱2
Видимая часть вселенной: сколько в ней звезд? NASA оценивает, что в наблюдаемой части вселенной может быть около одного септиллиона звезд — это 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 светил, разбросанных по двум триллионам галактик! Эти цифры подчеркивают невероятные масштаб и сложность космоса. Орбита 🌎
👍11🥰8👎1
Затмение с борта самолёта: уникальный взгляд на космическое шоу Выглядит как кадр из фильма про конец света, но это просто полное солнечное затмение с борта самолёта. Такой способ наблюдения даёт безоблачный обзор на тень Луны и корону Солнца, а ещё — часто более долгую фазу полной темноты по сравнению с землёй. Это настоящий подарок для учёных и охотников за редкими астрономическими феноменами. Орбита 🌎
👍10🤯9🔥4🥰3
360-градусный вид поверхности Луны в высоком разрешении Это впечатляющие изображения, созданные с помощью космического аппарата Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, который с 2009 года подробно сканирует Луну для NASA. Благодаря этим данным мы получаем беспрецедентную детализацию лунной поверхности, что помогает выбирать безопасные места для будущих миссий и изучать неизведанные районы. Орбита 🌎
🔥12❤4👍1👎1
В Атлантике нашли 200 000 бочек с радиоактивными отходами — их сбрасывали туда с 1946 по 1990 год. Ученые из проекта NODSSUM (CNRS и Ifremer) в 2025-2026 годах провели экспедиции и на глубине 4700 метров с помощью аппарата Nautile обнаружили, что бочки уже сильно проржавели, а радиоактивные вещества вытекают в океан. Зафиксированы повышенные уровни радионуклидов выше нормы — теперь можно оценить долгосрочное влияние…
😱13🤯6❤3👎1😢1
Солнечное затмение на Марсе глазами Perseverance На Марсе тоже бывают солнечные затмения, но выглядят они не так, как на Земле. Phobos слишком маленький, чтобы полностью закрыть Солнце с поверхности планеты — вместо полного затмения виден лишь частичный проход спутника. Ровер Perseverance использовал свою камеру Mastcam-Z, чтобы запечатлеть это редкое явление в сентябре 2024 года. Такие наблюдения помогают учёным т…
🔥15👍3👎1
Полное солнечное затмение 12 августа: влияние на погоду и атмосферу В среду, 12 августа, нас ждет полное солнечное затмение, которое повлияет на погоду вдоль своего пути — от Арктики через Гренландию, Исландию и Западную Европу. Когда Луна полностью перекрывает Солнце, происходит падение температуры, изменяется скорость и направление ветра, уменьшается влажность, а кучевые облака могут даже исчезать. Тень Луны блок…
❤15👍2👎1
Астрономы нашли новую формирующуюся планету — HD 169142 b. HD 169142 b — это молодой протопланет примерно с массой Юпитера, который вращается вокруг звезды HD 169142, создавая спиральные возмущения и прорезая щель в пылевом диске. Это лишь один из трёх подобных протопланетов, обнаруженных напрямую, что даёт учёным уникальную возможность увидеть этапы формирования гигантских планет, похожих на Юпитер. Красота! Орби…
❤20👍5👎1
Китайский Long March 7A взорвался через 85 секунд после старта. Это был первый запуск ракеты нового поколения, который закончился неудачей: Long March 7A — средне-тяжёлая ракета, разработанная CALT для выведения полезных грузов на высокую орбиту. Эта неудача стала заметным ударом по китайской космической программе — полезная нагрузка полностью утрачена. Орбита 🌎
🤯9😱6👎1😁1
NASA показали, как дым от пожаров во Франции распространяется по Европе. Визуализация создана с помощью GEOS-CF — новой версии модели NASA, специально сфокусированной на Франции. Она подробно показывает, как дым от июльских пожаров в Жиронде, Ландесе, Варе и Фонтенбло перемещается по Западной Европе и влияет на качество воздуха. Скоро в Европе будет не только жарко, но и душно. Орбита 🌎
😢7👍2👎1🤯1
Можно ли попасть в черную дыру? Алексей Семихатов Орбита 🌎
👍10❤5🔥3👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @orbitadigest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@orbitadigest edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 103,982 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ОРБИТА” (@orbitadigest), 10,037 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orbitadigest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.