Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ораторское искусство | Научись Говорить

@orator_uchis

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,271subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001714318235
TypeChannel
Username@orator_uchis
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/orator_uchis

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@diction_razvivay/115817 Nov 2025, 18:43 UTC@orator_uchis/1157 · this entry17 Nov 2025, 18:43 UTC1.00under a minute
@diction_razvivay/116019 Nov 2025, 10:13 UTC@orator_uchis/1159 · this entry19 Nov 2025, 10:13 UTC1.00under a minute
@diction_razvivay/116322 Nov 2025, 09:38 UTC@orator_uchis/1162 · this entry22 Nov 2025, 09:38 UTC1.00under a minute
@diction_razvivay/116423 Nov 2025, 19:28 UTC@orator_uchis/1163 · this entry23 Nov 2025, 19:28 UTC1.00under a minute
@diction_razvivay/116524 Nov 2025, 17:59 UTC@orator_uchis/1164 · this entry24 Nov 2025, 18:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@diction_razvivay/116625 Nov 2025, 11:33 UTC@orator_uchis/1165 · this entry25 Nov 2025, 11:33 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@diction_razvivay10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@diction_razvivay (100)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 11 November 2025 to 27 November 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @diction_razvivay. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

4,2714,2754,2736 August 2026 — 4,275 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,275 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,271 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,270–4,276 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 16:414,271-4
7 Aug 2026, 14:004,275no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:174,275first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

30 Nov 2025, 19:11 UTC≈10,500 viewsread 8 August 2026

Канал временно не обслуживается, за рекламой обращаться к действующему сотруднику на других каналах @artrecpromo

29 Nov 2025, 19:17 UTC≈11,000 viewsread 8 August 2026

Канал временно не обслуживается, за рекламой обращаться к действующему сотруднику на других каналах @artrecpromo

28 Nov 2025, 18:12 UTC≈11,500 viewsread 8 August 2026

Канал временно не обслуживается, за рекламой обращаться к действующему сотруднику на других каналах @artrecpromo

27 Nov 2025, 13:02 UTC≈11,100 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Под мышкой» и «подмышкой»: иностранцу эти слова и выговорить-то трудно, а отличить их вообще задача со звёздочкой. «Подмышка» — существительное со значением «внутренняя часть плечевого сгиба». В разговорной речи словом называют ещё и часть одежды, приходящуюся на это место: «пиджак жмёт в подмышках». Но иногда слово пишется раздельно, потому что «под мышкой» — это наречие. Оно может передавать смысл «под внутренней

26 Nov 2025, 06:33 UTC≈11,200 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Что на Руси называли «продажей»? Слово, слегка уже истасканное современностью, имеет древние корни. «Продажа» — это не только «плата за то, что дано кому-либо». В русском правовом кодексе «Русская правда» «продажей» называли штраф, который виновный уплачивал за нетяжкие нарушения закона. К таким относили кражу скота, разбои, телесные повреждения, более весомые проступки, связанные с холопами. Уплачивали «продажу» то

25 Nov 2025, 11:33 UTC≈10,600 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

На пол кладут глазурованную плитку, а в рот — глазированный сырок. И вообще класть в рот что-то глазурованное не рекомендуется: вряд ли это будет съедобно. Попробуй иностранцу объяснить разницу, сам запутаешься. Уверена, не каждый русскоговорящий знает, почему слова пишутся так, если оба изделия покрывает глазурь. «Глазурованный»и «глазированный» — это причастия. И образованы они от разных глаголов: «глазуровать» и

24 Nov 2025, 18:00 UTC≈10,800 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Забытый смысл слова «грядка». Огородники, дачники и садоводы, для вас я припасла интересный факт. У слов «грядка» и «гряда» до сих пор несколько значений, но о таком вы вряд ли слышали. В Энциклопедическом словаре Ф. А. Брокгауза и И. А. Ефрона указано, что «грядка» — шест, жердь или перекладина, приспособленная в крестьянской избе для вешания платья, просушки дров над печью, сохранения муки и т. п. Вот почему край

23 Nov 2025, 19:28 UTC≈10,400 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Одеваем Надежду, надевая одежду. И не дай словарь перепутать! В тонкостях приставок разберётся лишь самый дотошный. Даже киношной учительнице русского Наденьке из «Иронии судьбы» досталось от внимательных зрителей: праздничное платье она «одеть» забыла, видите ли. Как будто не знает, что на себя мы платье НАдеваем. Говорят, что в будущем оба глагола «срастутся» в единое целое, и этот нюанс предадут забвению. Со слов

22 Nov 2025, 09:38 UTC≈11,000 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Что раньше означало слово «врать»? Сейчас из всех значений глагола «врать» сохранилось одно: говорить неправду; сочинять небылицы; лгать, обманывать. На память о первом значении нам остались примеры из классики: «Полно врать пустяки, – сказала ему капитанша, – ты видишь, молодой человек с дороги устал; ему не до тебя…» (А. С. Пушкин, «Капитанская дочка») Выражение «врать пустяки» мы уже не используем, а когда-то он

21 Nov 2025, 17:52 UTC≈10,200 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не знаю кто, зачем и почему Внушал так долго сердцу моему И убеждал меня так много лет. Что никаких чудес на свете нет. И я почти поверил и привык, Но светлый ангел предо мной возник. Вдруг взмах крыла, и серебристый свет, И шум одежд, блистающих как снег. Ангел мой, ты вновь исчез из глаз. Ангел мой, приди еще хоть раз. Знаю, ты стоишь невдалеке, И сверкает меч в твоей руке. Не знаю, кто, зачем и почему Меня так

20 Nov 2025, 15:53 UTC≈10,900 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Владимир Маяковский никогда не был женат, хотя имел двоих детей. Яркий, высокий, привлекательный мужчина с недюжинным литературным талантом всегда был окружён вниманием дам. И хотя главной музой поэта считается Лиля Брик, у Маяковского было достаточно романов без её участия. В Ницце он познакомился с русской эмигранткой Елизаветой Зиберт, в результате их первой встречи родилась дочь Элен-Патрисия. В Париже, с подачи

19 Nov 2025, 10:13 UTC≈10,600 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Удивительно, но факт: раньше у слов «чадо» и «исчадие» было одно и то же значение. И «чадо», и «исчадие» произошли от исчезнувшего глагола «чати», связанного родственными узами с глаголами «зачать» и «начать». В буквальном смысле «чадо» — это «зачатое». Чаще всего слово используют при обращении к детям, а также при обращении духовного лица к младшему по званию или к мирянам. Вроде бы ничего нового, но как вам информ

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @orator_uchis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,073,686 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Новости правда
@newsprav_da · 203,652
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ораторское искусство | Научись Говорить” (@orator_uchis), 4,271 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orator_uchis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.