Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

optorepost

@optorepost

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

405subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001909304938
TypeChannel
Username@optorepost
Description@optozorax_dev рассказывает про очередную интересную штуку, которую откопал в интернете. Скорее всего на английском! Простите, кто не понимает английский(
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/optorepost

Growth

4057 Aug 2026, 13:52 — 405 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:46 — 405 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:528 Aug 2026, 05:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 404–406 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 05:46405no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:52405first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 2 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
19
Videos
5
Links
138

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

176 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5430.7%
👍5028.4%
😁1810.2%
🤔179.66%
🔥147.95%
😱42.27%
🏆31.70%
🤓31.70%
🤩31.70%
🥰31.70%
😭21.14%
🤡21.14%
👎10.568%
💩10.568%
🤨10.568%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 176reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2025 to 22 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @optorepost. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2025 to 22 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
5.26%
1 of 19 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
866
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
741
over 17 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzquydWAL12 August 20252 August 2025

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2025 to 22 April 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

22 Apr 2026, 22:54 UTC395 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вау, очень классное видео про биологию, и очень качественный канал, никогда раньше его не видел, но теперь наверное много от него посмотрю https://youtu.be/4be7cNX88p4

3

12 Apr 2026, 01:17 UTC487 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Рекомендую всем посмотреть, хотя бы в фоне. Это ужас до чего мошенники дошли... Особенно страшно если у вас есть дети, и мошенники таргетируют детей, тут про это отдельная большая часть. https://youtu.be/xJ0TXr4zBTg

🤡2😭2👍1

27 Nov 2025, 18:20 UTC855 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

2 часа отборнейшего контента, детальнейшим образом объясняющего, почему C++ - худший язык программирования. На удивление это видео так же одно из лучших ресурсов чтобы выучить множество особенностей C++, которые обычно выучиваются через боль и страдания, и нигде явно не прописаны. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fGB-hjc2Gc

😁156🥰2👍1

13 Nov 2025, 18:15 UTC774 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Оч интересный подкаст про биологию. А тиндер надо уничтожить (поймут те кто послушает выпуск) https://youtu.be/NwsXaBucCbQ

👍2

9 Nov 2025, 12:33 UTC717 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Очень интересный подкаст с эволюционным биологом Марковым, узнал реально много нового про эволюцию людей на рассмотрении такого фантастического сценария (что если бы мы не были прямоходящими) https://youtu.be/Z439j4Jm2Cc

👍1

6 Nov 2025, 16:15 UTC575 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Очень грамотный и интересный гость, не думал что про демографию будет так интересно слушать. https://youtu.be/umbtgR77mR8

3😱3👍2👎1

22 Oct 2025, 21:18 UTC682 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ого, не знал что у этой детали есть реальное практическое применение и такой большой лор... https://youtu.be/M6iIqZY4gvc

🤔104👍1🥰1😁1

19 Oct 2025, 12:56 UTC741 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Это клон майнкрафта, но в нём рендерятся НЕВЕРОЯТНЫЕ расстояния, горы высотой наверное в 2 тыщи блоков, а ещё там БЕСКОНЕЧНОЕ пространство под землёй!!! Я очень впечатлён этой игрой. Посмотрите и попробуйте скачать https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jm_0nRQEn_o

9🏆3👍3🔥1

18 Oct 2025, 01:07 UTC558 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Не знал что антенны в телефонах требуют настолько много развития технологий. И ещё неожиданно что развитие вышек сотовой связи тоже влияет на то какие можно вставить антенны в телефоны 🤔 https://youtu.be/RppnQ28BsiE

👍1

5 Sept 2025, 15:43 UTC681 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tech_priestessPhoto

Ключевые различия между мозгом и LLM В последнее время я довольно часто вижу споры о сходстве ИИ с биологическим мозгом, порой подогреваемые научно-популярными пересказами статей про "удивительные параллели между мозгом и нейросетями". Однако, без понимания основ того, чем биологический мозг и искусственная нейросеть принципиально отличаются друг от друга, невозможно трезво судить и о том, в чём они действительно по

8👍3💩1

3 Sept 2025, 01:15 UTC595 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У вас есть выбор: * Получить 1M$ прям щас * Получить 1B$ с шансом 1/500 Второй в среднем в 2 раза выгоднее, но почему вы скорее всего выберите первый вариант? Данное видео объясняет это с математической точки зрения. https://youtu.be/o-ovbHxSmuk

4

17 Aug 2025, 19:17 UTC≈5,620 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Видео про AlphaGeometry (модель, решающая олимпиадные задачи по геометрии). Упор делается на историческое развитие подходов к автоматическому решению геометрических задач с помощью компьютера. Как эти подходы развивались, и как они достигли вершин с приходом DeepMind и LLM. https://youtu.be/4NlrfOl0l8U

👍4🔥42🤨1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @optorepost. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“optorepost” (@optorepost), 405 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/optorepost.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.