Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Options 360

Channel

Options 360

@options_360

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,614subscribers

-81 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001360412847
TypeChannel
Username@options_360
DescriptionTechnical Analyst | Option trader | option360.in I share my opinion only
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/options_360

Growth

11,61411,69511,654.57 August 2026 — 11,695 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,695 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,693 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,687 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,683 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,681 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,677 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,675 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,666 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,661 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,656 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,653 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,649 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,644 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,638 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,636 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,627 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,623 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,620 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,618 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,614 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 20 days, net -81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,602–11,707 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 08:0411,614-4
27 Aug 2026, 05:2411,618-2
26 Aug 2026, 08:2511,620-3
25 Aug 2026, 05:1811,623-4
24 Aug 2026, 03:4711,627-9
22 Aug 2026, 11:5511,636-2
21 Aug 2026, 02:1311,638-6
20 Aug 2026, 03:1111,644-5
19 Aug 2026, 04:5511,649-4
18 Aug 2026, 06:1211,653-3
17 Aug 2026, 09:2611,656-5
15 Aug 2026, 18:5911,661-5
14 Aug 2026, 07:2711,666-9
12 Aug 2026, 22:2311,675-2
12 Aug 2026, 01:0211,677-4
11 Aug 2026, 03:4611,681-2
10 Aug 2026, 04:2611,683-4
9 Aug 2026, 05:5111,687-6
8 Aug 2026, 04:1411,693-2
7 Aug 2026, 23:0011,695first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
168
Links
426

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

93 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4245.2%
3739.8%
🥰77.53%
🔥66.45%
👌11.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2025 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 11:15 UTC≈2,050 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Today AI is ruling every aspect of tech world. So how many of you are using AI in their trading ? public poll No, I don’t know how to use – 239 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 72% Yes, I am using – 95 👍👍👍 28% 👥 334 people voted so far.

👍52

30 May 2026, 13:18 UTC≈4,140 views0 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://x.com/kapildhama/status/2060712346344165472?s=46

9 May 2026, 16:00 UTC≈5,500 views31 reactionsread 28 August 2026

The real test of any trading system begins during drawdowns. A 10% drawdown in a backtest feels harmless because there’s no real money or emotion attached to it. But the moment your live account goes down 10%, psychology takes over. Suddenly every trade feels wrong, confidence disappears, and even a proven system starts looking doubtful. Most traders don’t fail because of bad strategies. They fail because they can

👍229

30 Apr 2026, 15:21 UTC≈6,010 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://x.com/kapildhama/status/2049871665925169490?s=46

🥰21

19 Feb 2026, 10:26 UTC≈8,150 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Positional portfolio is around 12% plus in feb

🔥6

19 Feb 2026, 10:26 UTC≈7,910 viewsread 28 August 2026

https://x.com/algobharat/status/2024429007257878849?s=46

12 Feb 2026, 10:55 UTC≈8,500 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

If anyone wants to subscribe these algo, can fill the form 👇 https://algobharat.com/form.html

5

12 Feb 2026, 10:09 UTC≈8,020 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026

This month positional algo is almost 9% up

🥰4👍31👌1

12 Feb 2026, 10:09 UTC≈7,880 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://x.com/algobharat/status/2021889170311197075?s=46

4

3 Feb 2026, 10:41 UTC≈7,810 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://x.com/algobharat/status/2018635878806233472?s=46

2

1 Feb 2026, 08:55 UTC≈6,730 viewsread 28 August 2026

https://x.com/kapildhama/status/2017884243192697240?s=20

21 Jan 2026, 06:35 UTC≈6,650 viewsread 28 August 2026

https://x.com/prmdle_fi/status/2013862624304169463?s=20

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @options_360. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Options 360” (@options_360), 11,614 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/options_360.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.