Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Opter.io

@opterdex

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,364subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003004095031
TypeChannel
Username@opterdex
Created16 October 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/opterdex

Growth

4,3644,3744,3697 August 2026 — 4,374 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,374 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,372 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,364 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,363–4,376 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 10:044,364-8
10 Aug 2026, 13:264,372-2
7 Aug 2026, 18:474,374no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:174,374first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 16 October 2025the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1546.9%
1031.3%
😁39.38%
👏26.25%
🤣26.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2025 to 23 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Dec 2025, 16:39 UTC≈2,540 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/Opterdex/status/2003505623242326454?s=20

🔥42👏2

15 Dec 2025, 16:07 UTC≈3,350 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

When your crypto bags are volatile so you want exposure to shiny boomer rocks: Gold ($XAU) and Silver ($XAG) perps just went live on Opter — with up to 20x leverage. Trade them here 👉 http://trade.opter.io

🔥53

11 Dec 2025, 18:14 UTC≈2,770 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Arbitrum? Solana? Base? Ethereum? We don’t care what chain you’re loyal to. We care that your perps are fast, liquid and easy to access. Multi-chain perps live here 👉 trade.opter.io

1🔥1

10 Dec 2025, 11:22 UTC≈1,860 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

FOMC days don’t just move markets, they expose positioning. Here's a short breakdown on what actually matters today: – hawkish vs dovish cut – liquidity & QT – why the second move matters more than the first wick Worth a read before you trade it: 🔗 https://medium.com/@OpterDEX/fomc-meeting-today-why-this-expected-rate-cut-still-matters-for-traders-0f2aa12263d9

🔥2

9 Dec 2025, 19:22 UTC728 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/Opterdex/status/1998472831701840374

😁3

8 Dec 2025, 22:47 UTC≈1,230 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/Opterdex/status/1998162272095764659?s=20

🔥2🤣2

13 Nov 2025, 20:37 UTC≈3,630 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚀 Welcome to Opter — The Future of Decentralized Trading! We’re thrilled to officially open the doors to our global community. Opter is here to redefine on-chain trading — 100x leverage, real-world assets, and daily buybacks, all powered by fully non-custodial, transparent infrastructure. 💎 What Makes Opter Different: ✅ CEX-level performance — DEX-level transparency ✅ Trade crypto and RWAs on-chain ✅ Full wallet c

4🔥1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @opterdex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,003,879 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Opter.io” (@opterdex), 4,364 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/opterdex.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.