Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

IncelCryptoClub - OPSEC

@opsecbr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,195subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001535866064
TypeChannel
Username@opsecbr
Created19 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/opsecbr

Growth

1,1951,1991,1977 August 2026 — 1,199 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,199 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,198 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,195 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,194–1,200 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 12:141,195-3
8 Aug 2026, 14:241,198-1
7 Aug 2026, 23:181,199no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:561,199first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 16 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12m 01s
Average length
12m 01s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

599 reactions across 16 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬7011.7%
🔥6911.5%
👍599.85%
🗿528.68%
👏488.01%
😁477.85%
😭427.01%
376.18%
🖕325.34%
🤣213.51%
203.34%
👀152.50%
🙏142.34%
🥱122.00%
💩111.84%
🫡101.67%
🥰81.34%
🤡40.668%
🤪40.668%
🦄40.668%
9 further kinds203.34%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 599reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2025 to 3 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jan 2026, 17:03 UTC≈1,690 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🗿20👏3😢211

27 Sept 2025, 23:54 UTC≈2,160 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @packet_pusherPhoto

The Unitree G1 humanoid robot secretly and continuously sends sensor and system data to servers in China without the owner's knowledge or consent. Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14139 See also: Unitree Go1 “backdoor” control channel. Attackers could drive the robot (with real-world safety implications) and pivot into the internal network from the dog. https://takeonme.org/cves/cve-2025-2894/

🔥81

12 Sept 2025, 19:52 UTC≈2,280 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

A ditadura só aumenta...

👍17🔥112💅2🦄2

9 Sept 2025, 21:15 UTC≈2,150 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tupireport

🇺🇸💥🇧🇷⚖️ — The White House stated that it is not afraid to use economic and MILITARY power against the Brazilian Government and the Supreme Federal Court (STF) due to the "persecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro" with the use of lawfare by the Court ministers: "Freedom of expression is absolute and we will defend it in our own way"

19🥱6🫡51👀1🖕1

11 Aug 2025, 21:21 UTC≈3,460 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍20🗿15🔥12💩4🤮2

9 Aug 2025, 16:22 UTC≈1,990 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MoneroEconomicForumPhoto

Privacy is dead

👀14🔥5🗿2😱211

22 Jun 2025, 01:46 UTC≈2,500 views67 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @movimntoderosistenciaafricanerPhoto

Israel matou toda a alta cúpula militar iraniana (20 oficiais de alta patente), atingiu 6 instalações nucleares, destruiu a maior refinaria de petróleo de Teerã, destruiu o depósito subterrâneo de mísseis do Irã, destruiu a infraestrutura de defesa antiaérea do Irã (e agora os caças israelenses entram e saem do território iraniano quase sem oposição), infiltrou agentes e tomou conta do serviço de contrainteligência i

🖕3116🔥6🥱62💩2🤷‍♂2🗿1

20 Apr 2025, 15:15 UTC≈4,230 views81 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Essa mensagem foi embutida no bloco nº 666.666 do Bitcoin. “Não se deixem vencer pelo mal, mas vençam o mal com o bem – Romanos 12:21” ✝️

👏45🙏14🥰8🗿6💩3🔥2🦄21

15 Mar 2025, 23:19 UTC≈2,940 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BibliotecaDoGokuVideo

Como desaparecer sem deixar rastros #Defesa_Pessoal #Dicas @BibliotecaDoGoku

👍16🗿51

18 Feb 2025, 21:19 UTC≈3,910 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.tecmundo.com.br/seguranca/402689-telegram-dados-de-1008-brasileiros-foram-entregues-as-autoridades-so-em-2024.htm

🤬33😁12🗿1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @opsecbr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IncelCryptoClub - OPSEC” (@opsecbr), 1,195 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/opsecbr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.