Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Заметки колориста Ивакина

Channel

Заметки колориста Ивакина

@operator_notes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,014subscribers

+146 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001140587411
TypeChannel
Username@operator_notes
Created19 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/operator_notes

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,8687,0436,955.56 August 2026 — 6,868 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,868 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,871 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,947 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,955 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,962 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,961 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,966 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,965 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,969 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,986 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,035 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,043 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,039 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,024 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,014 subscribers7,0146 August 202627 September 2026
16 measurements spanning 52 days, net +146. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,842–7,069 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 06:157,014-10
18 Sept 2026, 08:207,024-15
13 Sept 2026, 23:397,039-4
10 Sept 2026, 15:177,043+8
5 Sept 2026, 13:587,035+49
2 Sept 2026, 01:576,986+17
30 Aug 2026, 08:236,969+4
27 Aug 2026, 12:446,965-1
24 Aug 2026, 07:146,966+5
20 Aug 2026, 04:346,961-1
16 Aug 2026, 19:436,962+7
13 Aug 2026, 02:466,955+8
10 Aug 2026, 02:166,947+76
6 Aug 2026, 16:316,871+3
6 Aug 2026, 03:306,868no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:266,868first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 29 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 10s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,159 reactions across 26 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣45939.6%
❤30926.7%
🔥22719.6%
👍13912.0%
🤬171.47%
🤮50.431%
👎20.173%
💩10.086%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,259 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC≈1,190 views43 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Буквально такое же вы можете сделать со своим изображением...

🤣36❤4👍3

14 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC≈2,000 views32 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Как свести кинодела с ума: Рассказать про существование логарифмической ЛИНЕЙКИ И не надо правой кнопкой тыкать

🤣23❤6👍3

12 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC≈1,970 views53 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣52❤1

11 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC≈2,410 views39 reactionsread 20 August 2026

У RED отобрали один из главных патентов на сжатый RAW. Что это значит для камер? В Японии произошло довольно важное событие для производителей камер: суд поддержал аннулирование ключевых пунктов японского патента RED на запись сжатого RAW-видео внутри камеры. Причём добилась этого Panasonic, а защищать патент пришлось Nikon, которая после покупки RED стала его владельцем. Ирония тут почти идеальная: ещё несколько л…

🔥17👍10🤮5❤4🤣2💩1

9 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC≈1,920 views104 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

У вас есть 2 часа?

🔥59❤20👍16🤣9

6 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈2,800 views60 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://youtu.be/YfFAw2u-L_8?si=XSyKS3Vbx7a0VMRX

🤣43👍9❤4🔥4

6 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC≈2,350 views196 reactionsread 20 August 2026

100 лайков и дропаю на ютуб

❤168👍17🔥8👎2🤣1

6 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC≈2,210 views96 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥50❤31👍14🤣1

5 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC≈2,260 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Может быть кто-то ранее видел этот шот И знает где его найти Плиз Пришлите в комменты Upd: нашли

❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @operator_notes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DONETS
@donetsraw · 32,202
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 6 September 2026
Музыка для видео
@music_for_video · 44,495
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
KHS — Фабрика Творцов
@khsfilms · 35,956
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
DaVinci Resolve Templates
@DaVinci_Resolve_Templates · 32,601
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 5 September 2026
Старый Спорт
@oldsport_official · 20,733
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 September 2026
@gustarev [365] 🔥
@gustarev365 · 24,541
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 September 2026
LISTOPADOV | Монтаж видео
@listopadov_video · 22,282
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Заметки колориста Ивакина” (@operator_notes), 7,014 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/operator_notes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.