Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

OpenOlymp

@openolymp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,404subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001644499915
TypeChannel
Username@openolymp
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/openolymp

Growth

2,4047 Aug 2026, 09:32 — 2,404 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:07 — 2,404 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:328 Aug 2026, 01:07
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,402–2,406 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 01:072,404no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:322,404first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 6 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

332 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14744.3%
🔥5817.5%
💊3811.4%
❤‍🔥206.02%
😁206.02%
🤬103.01%
😭92.71%
👎82.41%
🙏51.51%
👍41.20%
👻41.20%
🥴41.20%
🐳20.602%
😈10.301%
😢10.301%
🙊10.301%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 332reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 6 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Apr 2026, 14:50 UTC≈3,890 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всем привет!⭐️ Итоговые результаты XX Открытой олимпиады по программированию: 📌 https://inf-open.ru/2025-26/final-results/

🔥14❤‍🔥43🐳2😢1🙊1

17 Mar 2026, 07:35 UTC≈3,500 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Доброе утро, дорогие участники! ✨ 📸Фотографии с финала Открытой олимпиады в Москве доступны по ссылке.

❤‍🔥147👍4💊2🔥1

7 Mar 2026, 16:08 UTC≈4,870 views74 reactionsread 7 August 2026

XX Открытая олимпиада по программированию завершена, поздравляем призеров и победителей и желаем удачи на следующих олимпиадах! ✨

💊36🔥294👻4❤‍🔥1

7 Mar 2026, 16:05 UTC≈4,550 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

10

7 Mar 2026, 15:05 UTC≈5,920 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Начинается закрытие олимпиады в зале соревнований.

🔥13🙏51

7 Mar 2026, 14:29 UTC≈3,440 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ссылка на разбор: https://vkvideo.ru/video-63282215_456239431

10👎8

7 Mar 2026, 12:43 UTC≈2,770 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

✅Дедлайн отправки видеофайла с прокторингом для дистанционных участников 20:00 Ссылка на форму: https://inf-open.ru/form/69aacf26cb1b274787f0b1ba/

😁51

7 Mar 2026, 12:20 UTC≈2,860 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Дорогие участники, расскажите, как вам тур, но только на языке программирования 💙

14

7 Mar 2026, 08:18 UTC≈4,240 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

▶️Таблица результатов: https://olympiads.ru/nniKlcXois2tdlaepPTo4x0d.html

13

7 Mar 2026, 07:17 UTC≈2,740 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

18

7 Mar 2026, 06:56 UTC≈2,880 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📱Ссылка на трансляцию второго тура: https://vkvideo.ru/video-63282215_456239430

5

7 Mar 2026, 06:31 UTC≈2,410 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пока участники занимают свои места за компьютерами, предлагаем вспомнить, каким может быть настрой перед вторым туром 💙

18😁11🥴4❤‍🔥1😈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @openolymp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 994,957 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OpenOlymp” (@openolymp), 2,404 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/openolymp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.