Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

精选话题

@oothua

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

28,940subscribers

+1,502 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002040281145
TypeChannel
Username@oothua
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/oothua

Growth

27,43828,95028,1947 August 2026 — 27,438 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,455 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,488 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,498 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,950 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,912 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,940 subscribers28,9407 August 202613 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +1,502. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,211–29,177 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:5628,940+28
12 Aug 2026, 03:4228,912-38
11 Aug 2026, 02:3728,950+452
10 Aug 2026, 01:4328,498+10
9 Aug 2026, 02:5128,488+1,033
8 Aug 2026, 03:5727,455+17
7 Aug 2026, 17:1627,438first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.2%
avg views ÷ 28,940 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,330
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held26 (29 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total242,480
Reactions total139
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

139 reactions across 24 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12992.8%
👍42.88%
👏42.88%
🔥10.719%
😁10.719%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 02:56 UTC≈2,920 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#今日话题 #幽灵娘 有你喜欢的幽灵娘么,身材咋样,身材不好的挺吓人的,有位兄弟想看幽灵娘,正好有点存稿。没身材的幽灵娘不是好的幽灵娘,身材好的才不吓人,可以直接按 🔗 分享码: 9e2634b9 📎 点击机器人观看

3

11 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC≈5,010 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#今日话题 #骚屁眼 你开过几个肛,你的妹子妹子的喜欢么,有些妹子非常喜欢后面带来的快感,玩了不少妹子刚开始是拒绝的,慢慢的就喜欢进后面的感觉,也非常的配合你玩 🔗 分享码: be53521a 📎 点击机器人观看

4

10 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC≈6,150 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#今日话题 #反差小姐姐 你身边的小姐姐,反差大么,平时看起来乖巧 清纯的小姐姐在背后其实一样的骚,有些比那些看起来风骚妹子更加风骚,到了床上每个妹子都一样的,被干爽的时候都会哇哇叫,跟平时穿衣服的时候完全两个人 🔗 分享码: 048f8992 📎 点击机器人观看

11

9 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC≈6,740 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#今日话题 #弹力摇 给你跳弹力摇女孩,绝对骚,双马尾加上弹力插,绝对淫荡无比,少女就是好,体力和身体都是最棒的时候,耐操 在镜头面前裸露超粉嫩的美体和动感的身姿简直让人看得欲罢不能 🔗 分享码: b61ae00a 📎 点击机器人观看

3

8 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC≈7,760 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#今日话题 #网易CC 你喜欢网易cc的主播, 值得礼物么 ,刷了多少,这个平台的妹子是真不错,颜值舞蹈什么的都是顶尖的,各方面诱惑极限拉满 ,就了礼物太贵了 🔗 分享码: 448d4cc2 📎 点击机器人观看

3👍3

8 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC≈8,180 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#今日话题 #混合剪辑 你的剪辑过作品么, 卡点到位么,只要视频剪辑的好,就能满足一切幻想,总有一些鬼才剪辑出的视频比原来的更带劲,好的技术在哪里都能搞到吃的 🔗 分享码: d9963982 📎 点击机器人观看

7

7 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈8,540 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#今日话题 #巨物 你买的巨物,多大,给女朋友用么,女人真的是深不可测,尤其是欧美的女人真的是太牛了,多大都能放进去,不疼么,真是太厉害了 🔗 分享码: 6c0fe76f 📎 点击机器人观看

3

7 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC≈8,420 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#今日话题 #裸贷 你身边贷款的女人, 多不多,没钱了怎么办, 衣服一脱钱马上就到账,这是针对女人, 那男人呢, 我也想脱衣服 保证小飞棍甩的飞起,唯一的要求是曝光的时候帮我P大一点 🔗 分享码: 7769f8d8 📎 点击机器人观看

9

6 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC≈9,190 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#今日话题 #内射 你还是内射阶段么,好久没有内射了,戴套又不舒服,所以不是射嘴巴就是射屁眼。 其实内射真的爽,不用想别的死劲冲刺就行,到了就释放 🔗 分享码: c0d621ae 📎 点击机器人观看

4

6 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC≈9,320 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#今日话题 #收藏的av 你收藏的av,哪个片打飞机的最多,这么多看片的经历,最好打飞机的还是日本拍的片子,这些年也陆陆续续的收藏了一下,给你们也打打飞机 🔗 分享码: 1bc3d661 📎 点击机器人观看

4

5 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC≈9,360 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_6267942748

5 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC≈9,200 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#今日话题 #年轻的妹子 你喜欢的妹子, 18岁的 还是少妇 还是熟女,各个阶段的妹子都有特点,但是男人永远喜欢18岁的妹子, 一个嫩,就能覆盖所有的缺点 🔗 分享码: 170a9a60 📎 点击机器人观看

9

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @oothua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 843,896 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“精选话题” (@oothua), 28,940 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oothua.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.