Channel
@ool_3
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,952subscribers
-42 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002187610822 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ool_3 |
| Description | ● قناة متكاملة لكافة المراحل تحتوي على محاضرات الخصوصي لكافة المدرسين و وزاريات وملازم بصيغة 𝙿𝙳𝙵 ⌯ بوت راي التعليمي: @f_pb33bot ' يحتوي على المحاضرات والملازم ' ⌯ بوت التواصل: @A_TTT47BOT وهذه القناة هيّ بداية لمشروع الغرض منه فائدة الطلبة . |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ool_3 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 8,952 | -42 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 8,994 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 15 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (15 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 37,882 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
❗️#هـام ، التربية النيابية 0️⃣النائب ميادة عودة الحميداوي تتقدم بطلب رسمي لإدراج قرارات "تحسين المعدل، المحاولات ب٣ مواد ، والدور الثالث " على جدول أعمال الجلسات القادمة لمجلس النواب ✅راي للتعليم || @scientific_2024 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ - @lI0Il0II | راي للتعليم
أهم شي لازم تركز عليه بمراجعتك هيّ أسئلة الفصول .. ليش؟ ركز وياي⤵ حلول أسئلة الفصل هي الطريق المختصر ١- هي تكشف نقاط ضعفك قبل ما يكشفها الامتحان. ٢- ادربك على نفس نمط الأسئلة اللي راح تواجهها. ٣- تثبت المعلومات بعقلك لأنك تطبقها مو بس تقراها. ببساطة: اللي يتقنها … يضمن الـ 0⃣0⃣1⃣ كافة أسئلة الفصول ⤵ https://t.me/RayHSNBot?start=7e2b2b41a2916d25d41e53c8417bc07b
1⃣ حل أسئلة المناقشة للإسلامية ⤵ - https://t.me/RayHSNBot?start=08d23bf607df2cd11d6cc73801592500 2⃣ حل أسئلة المناقشة للعربي ⤵ - https://t.me/RayHSNBot?start=1dadfbf9a79ae95b395e4d99cf3d93ee 3⃣ حل أسئلة النشاط للإنكليزي ⤵ - https://t.me/RayHSNBot?start=ca95a719bf83e0b91bb8b8755fc6e18e 5⃣ حل أسئلة الفصل للرياضيات ⤵ - https://t.me/RayHSNBot?start=30bd59b18aa8a37816cc6019c6dbca7c 5⃣ حل أسئلة الفصل للأحياء ⤵ - https:…
❗️#عـاجل، المتحدث بأسم وزارة التربية : ⏺عدد الطلبة الذي يشملهم الدخول الشامل قد يتجاوزون "الـ200 الف طالب" ⏺قرار الدخول الشامل لا يشمل طلبة الخارجي ✅راي للتعليم || @scientific_2024 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ - @lI0Il0II | راي للتعليم
❗️#عاجل ، الإعتراضات 0️⃣نتائج الاعتراضات للسادس الاعدادي : ➖التربية توضح بأن اعلان نتائج الاعتراضات ستكون عبر رسائل الـ SMS وستصل للطلبة بداية الاسبوع . ✅راي للتعليم || @scientific_2024 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ - @lI0Il0II | راي للتعليم
راجعوا هذا النمط الوزاري أكثر من مرة، لأنو مهم جدًا ويساعدكم تتعرفون على طريقة الأسئلة وتثبتون المعلومات. ولا تكتفون بالقراءة حاولوا تحلون بأنفسكم وتراجعون أخطاءكم 🤍
✅دليل أسئلة الامتحانات الوزارية للسادس العلمي مع الأجوبة لدفعة 2026 الدور الأول - الاسلامية: اضغط🤩الأجوبة: اضغط - العربي: اضغط🤩الأجوبة: اضغط - الانكليزي: اضغط🤩الأجوبة: اضغط - الاحياء: اضغط🤩الأجوبة: اضغط - الرياضيات: اضغط🤩الأجوبة: اضغط - الكيمياء: اضغط🤩الأجوبة: اضغط - الفيزياء: اضغط🤩الأجوبة: اضغط ✅راي للتعليم || @scientific_2024 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ - @lI0Il0II | راي للتعليم
#هام ، #الدور_الثاني 🟠أهم المواضيع للدور الثاني والدخول الشامل إلي من الضروري أنو تدرسها حتى تضمن الدرجة ⤵ https://t.me/scientific_2024/5840
#عـاجل ، #الدور_الثالث 🟠النائب علاء الحيدري: الدور الثالث على طاولة مجلس الوزراء ✅ راي للتعليم || @scientific_2024 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ - @lI0Il0II | راي للتعليم
🟠سيتم عرض قرار الدخول الشامل بجلسة مجلس الوزراء للموافقة على القرار. ✅ راي للتعليم || @scientific_2024 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ - @lI0Il0II | راي للتعليم
❗️#عاجل ، #الدخول_الشامل 🟠وزارة التربية: بناءً على المُداولة بين رئيس مجلس الوزراء الأستاذ علي الزيدي ووزير التربية عبد الكريم عبطان، واستكمالاً لقرار هيئة الرأي في وزارة التربية بشأن الدخول الشامل لطلبة الثالث المتوسط والسادس الإعدادي، حصلت الموافقة على تهيئة إجراءات القرار لعرضه في مجلس الوزراء. ✅ راي للتعليم || @scientific_2024 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ - @lI0Il0II | راي للتعليم
❗️#عاجل ، #الدخول_الشامل 0️⃣النائب زهراء الحجامي : تم الاتصال بمعالي وزير التربية وأكد لنا صدور موافقة رئيس الوزراء ، وسيصدر كتاب من وزارة التربية في الساعات القادمة إن شاء الله. ✅ راي للتعليم || @scientific_2024 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ - @lI0Il0II | راي للتعليم
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @ool_3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,194,320 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“يبرق السادس || yabraq” (@ool_3), 8,952 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ool_3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.