Channel
@onsi_me
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
6,323subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001995805417 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onsi_me |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onsi_me |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 6,323 | +15 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 6,308 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (11 August 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,368 |
| Reactions total | 239 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
239 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 103 | 43.1% | |
| 🔥 | 50 | 20.9% | |
| 💘 | 39 | 16.3% | |
| 🥰 | 29 | 12.1% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 2.93% | |
| 💅 | 6 | 2.51% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.26% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.837% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 239reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня никакой смысловой нагрузки 🤍 Желаем кайфово провести остаток лета, успеть исполнить планы и уже присматривать луки на осень✨ А теперь небольшой чек-лист настоящей ONSI GIRL: ♡ зарегистрировалась в нашем чат-боте и забрала свои бонусы? ♡ участвуешь в конкурсе, где целых 7 победителей? Если нет → тебе сюда ♡ уже посмотрела обзор AUTUMN DROP ’26 от Бориса и выбрала своего фаворита? Если на всё ответила «да» —…
💘28❤16🥰7
Onsi girls, как вам этот вайб?⚡️ Собрали этот образ из новой коллекции без сложных формул, все вещи легко миксуются между собой🤎 Расслаблено, удобно, но с характером! Носили бы так или добавили что-то свое? Все вещи из образа тут - если захотелось примерить😉
❤18🔥9🥰5
Девочки, было?? 😅 Ну ладно, для бэсти ничего не жалко🌞 А мы напоминаем, что остались последние размеры ШОРТ по самой выгодной стоимости: • шорты base [как на фото] в оттенке blue, pink light, milk и light melange по 2750₽ • шорты-полоска из коллекции Riviera в оттенке green, pink и light blue по 1999₽ • и несколько последних оттенков кроп-шорт – бестселлеров сезона по 2750₽ Пересылай своей 👯♀️ - пусть выбирает с…
❤13💘11💅6
Никаких пресных образов! Добавляем в базовый комфорт щепотку характера и классного настроения⚡️ Любимая музыка в наушниках и сегодняшняя формула: Брюки баллоны + лонгслив реглан = удобный образ на прохладный день🤍 Забрать бонусы > чат-бот Onsi Посмотреть образ > onsi.store
❤20🔥8🥰6
В коллекции Onsi впервые появилось ХУДИ БЕЗ ЗАМКА 💥 То самое, которое хочется накинуть и больше не снимать.. Объёмное, мягкое, с большим капюшоном и расслабленной посадкой — для долгих прогулок, прохладных вечеров и дней, когда хочется максимального комфорта🩶 ⚡️мы остановились на четырех оттенках: Новый лавандовый Классический серый меланж Насыщенный красный Вкусный шоколадный Тоже захотелось примерить?! Autumn d…
❤17👏7🔥4
Голосуем:
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤8😍2🔥1
Представьте, вы сегодня - главный редактор Onsi🤓 С чего начинаем знакомство с новой коллекцией??👀
🔥14❤3👍3
Autumn is here 🍂 Эта коллекция особенная для нас, потому что в ней есть частичка вас, Onsi girls💞 Вы делились тем, чего вам не хватало, что хотелось изменить и в чём хотелось чувствовать себя собой. Мы слушали — и превращали ваши слова в посадку, цвета и детали. Худи с капюшоном в любимых оттенках, самые комфортные брюки, расслабленные лонгсливы и рубашка-бестселлер в новом осеннем оттенке: про вас сегодняшних и п…
🔥14🥰11❤8
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @onsi_me. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Голосуем:
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ONSI” (@onsi_me), 6,323 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onsi_me.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.