Channel
@onlyhumanities_geography
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
1,134subscribers
+38 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002068119223 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onlyhumanities_geography |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onlyhumanities_geography |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 1,134 | +19 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 1,115 | +18 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:20 | 1,097 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 1,096 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,164 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
24 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 75.0% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 12.5% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Tying this concept to those taking H1/H2 Geography, the problem right now is that most of the world still follows a linear economy — where we extract, produce, consumer, dispose. Instead of a circular economy — where we try to keep the resources in use for as long as possible by repairing, reusing, reducing and recycling so that it does not end up in the landfill. This allows us to still consume without having to con…
❤4
Signed PS
In fact, if all the people around the world lived like Singaporeans, our Earth Overshoot Day would land on February 2023. Of course I understand it is more nuanced than that as we are a small country that's reliant on imported resources, thus naturally our carbon footprint will be higher. But, that does not discount the fact that we do have a large consumerism culture (e.g., blind boxes, fast fashion clothes, puffer …
❤3
Signed PS
https://earth.org/earth-overshoot-day-2026/ Sharing something interesting for subscribers today! Introducing Earth Overshoot Day, a concept that was actually first introduced to me by my secondary school Geography teacher — it marks the day that we use up ALL of our resource budget for the year. (yes I am using em dash, and no I did not use ChatGPT to generate this, it's just called proper usage of punctuation for …
❤4
Signed PS
Almost forget to continue this series, been busy the past one month so I didn't really have the time to do up the topical practice papers
⚡1
Signed PS
Gonna go through the GIEL part of this paper later, LIVE @11.30pm on Tiktok
⚡1👍1
Signed PS
File, posted without a caption
Signed PS
Sunday (no) REST day!!!
Signed PS
Hope y'all tried them!
Signed PS
Sorry for NOT going LIVE yesterday, I was sick 😭
❤1🙏1
Signed PS
Ok, the next topic is Climate. So for those taking core/pure geography or elective geo student doing climate, do try to attempt them!
❤1
Signed PS
3rd set of answer!
Signed PS
Here's the second set of answers!
Signed PS
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @onlyhumanities_geography. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 595,257 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OnlyHumanities - Geography” (@onlyhumanities_geography), 1,134 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onlyhumanities_geography.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.