Я ЧЕСТНО НЕ МОГУ ОПИСАТЬ ТО, ЧТО ЧУВСТВУЮ К ЭТИМ ФОТКАМ
custom 54699169104789697573

Channel
@onlyfortm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
150subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003967172799 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onlyfortm |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onlyfortm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 150 | +6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 144 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 144 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (13 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 780 |
| Reactions total | 165 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
165 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5407043519887986568 | 41 | 24.8% | |
| custom 5469916910478969757 | 34 | 20.6% | |
| custom 5260237083829615865 | 32 | 19.4% | |
| custom 5348531539737070001 | 22 | 13.3% | |
| custom 5251214345383216259 | 20 | 12.1% | |
| custom 5202113901298218677 | 8 | 4.85% | |
| custom 5249362381254992536 | 8 | 4.85% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @onlyfortm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я ЧЕСТНО НЕ МОГУ ОПИСАТЬ ТО, ЧТО ЧУВСТВУЮ К ЭТИМ ФОТКАМ
custom 54699169104789697573
MY WOOKIE SPOOKIE NOOKIE POOKIE CUTE PIE MUFFIN BOYS🌟🌟🌟
custom 54070435198879865684custom 53485315397370700012custom 52512143453832162591custom 54699169104789697571
ㅤㅤㅤㅤ🤩оследние дни лета, любимая музыка и человек, рядом с которым хочется, чтобы август никогда не заканчивался . . 🩹 хорошие 🎀омас 🎀онги собрали для вас подборку самых комфортных каналов ! ! вдруг ваше счастье находится именно тут . ⤵️⤵️
поменяла аву, не теряем !!
custom 54699169104789697573custom 52602370838296158652
ㅤㅤㅤㅤЯ ПРОСТО НИКТО ПОСЛЕ ЭТИХ ФОТОК, ЖЕНАТИКИ ТОПМИНЫ ? ? СЛОВ НЕТ, ОДНИ ЭМОЦИИ .
custom 54070435198879865689custom 52602370838296158653custom 53485315397370700013
MY MARRIED COUPLE🌟🌟
custom 53485315397370700019custom 52602370838296158654custom 54070435198879865682
ㅤㅤㅤДУМАЮ, КАЖДЫЙ ЧЕЛОВЕК НА ПЛАНЕТЕ ХОЧЕТ УРОВЕНЬ ТАНЦЕВ МИНЛИ ! 🤍 # minlee's TikTok update
custom 540704351988798656810custom 52021139012982186776custom 53485315397370700013
ㅤㅤㅤㅤмальчики официально представлены как участники/приглашённые актёры на MNL Fashion Week 2026 ! !
custom 54070435198879865688custom 52493623812549925363custom 53485315397370700013
ㅤㅤㅤㅤРЕВУ, МОИ ДУРАКИ
custom 526023708382961586514custom 52512143453832162593custom 54699169104789697573custom 52493623812549925361
ㅤㅤㅤ🤍 # top's weibo : «Спасибо журналу за то, что сделал пожертвование от нашего имени. Я очень счастлив, что вместе с @Minlee陈晓珥 мы смогли придать этому сотрудничеству ещё один особенный смысл. Надеюсь, что эта забота сможет передать ещё больше тепла. 💜🩵 #toptapminlee#» 🤍 # minlee's weibo «Спасибо журналу за то, что сделал благотворительное пожертвование от нашего имени. Я очень рад возможности вмест…
custom 54070435198879865688custom 52493623812549925363custom 52021139012982186772custom 52512143453832162592
ВЫ СЛИШКОМ МНОГО НАСТАВИЛИ ЗВЕЗД😭 спасибо большое всем, мне безумно приятно 💝
custom 54699169104789697575
ㅤㅤㅤㅤТОП НА ВТОРОМ КАДРЕ ТАКОЙ КОТ🤏🤏💔
custom 525121434538321625914custom 54699169104789697575custom 52602370838296158654
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @onlyfortm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,172,529 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ꨄ Minlee's Toptap ! Payback Era” (@onlyfortm), 150 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onlyfortm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.