Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Онлайн Брест - новости

Channel

Онлайн Брест - новости

@onlinebrestby

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21,138subscribers

+25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001190866145
TypeChannel
Username@onlinebrestby
DescriptionНовости Бреста и Беларуси Отправить нам сообщение - https://t.me/onlinebrest_bot ВКонтакте - https://vk.com/onlinebrest Наш сайт - https://onlinebrest.by
Created4 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/onlinebrestby

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

21,01621,20121,108.56 August 2026 — 21,113 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,113 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,134 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,142 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,156 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,148 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,142 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,138 subscribers15 August 2026 — 21,124 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,118 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,110 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,132 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,135 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,132 subscribers22 August 2026 — 21,123 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,124 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,113 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,111 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,113 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,118 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,113 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,127 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,115 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,109 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,093 subscribers5 September 2026 — 21,079 subscribers9 September 2026 — 21,059 subscribers11 September 2026 — 21,049 subscribers13 September 2026 — 21,044 subscribers15 September 2026 — 21,060 subscribers19 September 2026 — 21,057 subscribers26 September 2026 — 21,047 subscribers4 October 2026 — 21,044 subscribers9 October 2026 — 21,034 subscribers13 October 2026 — 21,029 subscribers14 October 2026 — 21,020 subscribers15 October 2026 — 21,016 subscribers16 October 2026 — 21,021 subscribers17 October 2026 — 21,082 subscribers18 October 2026 — 21,199 subscribers19 October 2026 — 21,201 subscribers20 October 2026 — 21,198 subscribers22 October 2026 — 21,196 subscribers24 October 2026 — 21,194 subscribers25 October 2026 — 21,191 subscribers26 October 2026 — 21,184 subscribers27 October 2026 — 21,187 subscribers28 October 2026 — 21,175 subscribers29 October 2026 — 21,167 subscribers31 October 2026 — 21,165 subscribers1 November 2026 — 21,166 subscribers2 November 2026 — 21,165 subscribers3 November 2026 — 21,163 subscribers4 November 2026 — 21,167 subscribers5 November 2026 — 21,175 subscribers6 November 2026 — 21,171 subscribers7 November 2026 — 21,175 subscribers8 November 2026 — 21,156 subscribers10 November 2026 — 21,148 subscribers12 November 2026 — 21,138 subscribers21,1386 August 202612 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 98 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,988–21,229 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 13:0121,138-10
10 Nov 2026, 08:4621,148-8
8 Nov 2026, 23:4721,156-19
7 Nov 2026, 17:5921,175+4
6 Nov 2026, 16:4721,171-4
5 Nov 2026, 19:0821,175+8
4 Nov 2026, 17:5621,167+4
3 Nov 2026, 15:0821,163-2
2 Nov 2026, 15:3621,165-1
1 Nov 2026, 15:1621,166+1
31 Oct 2026, 12:1121,165-2
29 Oct 2026, 11:5421,167-8
28 Oct 2026, 08:3921,175-12
27 Oct 2026, 05:3621,187+3
26 Oct 2026, 04:2721,184-7
25 Oct 2026, 04:3821,191-3
24 Oct 2026, 02:0621,194-2
22 Oct 2026, 01:5721,196-2
20 Oct 2026, 21:3621,198-3
19 Oct 2026, 17:1721,201first reading

Engagement

379 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 80 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.8%
avg views ÷ 21,138 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,400
113 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.248%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
113
of 379 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 108 of 113 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held379 (5 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total496,839
Reactions total1,212
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 15:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈74,300
Videos
≈3,840
Links
≈50,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 53s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,419 reactions across 372 posts, in 56 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,36025.1%
👍78014.4%
😢59511.0%
🤬4047.46%
😱3837.07%
🤡2915.37%
👎1943.58%
👏1733.19%
😁1592.93%
🤯1362.51%
🔥1071.97%
😭971.79%
💊791.46%
🤣561.03%
☃551.01%
🤔450.83%
😡420.775%
👀360.664%
💔330.609%
🙈330.609%
36 further kinds3616.66%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 373 of the 379 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,419 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 379 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 113 posts held from the last 30 days (6.19%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 15:35 UTC329 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Работникам лицея в Бресте пришлось взяться за огнетушитель Что произошло → https://onlinebrest.by/novosti/rabotnikam-litseya-v-breste-prishlos-vzyatsya-za-ognetushitel-chto-proizoshlo

13 Nov 2026, 14:31 UTC≈1,180 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

В общежитии Бреста сработала «Молния» Что обнаружили прибывшие спасатели → https://onlinebrest.by/novosti/v-obschezhitii-bresta-srabotala-molniya-chto-obnaruzhili-pribyvshie-spasateli

13 Nov 2026, 13:56 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Житель Барановичей хранил дома 5850 пачек сигарет Что решил суд → https://onlinebrest.by/novosti/zhitel-baranovichey-hranil-doma-5850-pachek-sigaret-chto-reshil-sud

13 Nov 2026, 12:22 UTC≈2,120 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

После видео с подарком у белоруски стали спрашивать о работе Что ей вручили → https://onlinebrest.by/novosti/posle-video-s-podarkom-u-beloruski-stali-sprashivat-o-rabote-chto-ey-vruchili

13 Nov 2026, 11:00 UTC≈2,560 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Кусок мяса стал причиной смерти мужчины в Беларуси Как это произошло → https://onlinebrest.by/novosti/kusok-myasa-stal-prichinoy-smerti-muzhchiny-v-belarusi-kak-eto-proizoshlo

12 Nov 2026, 19:01 UTC≈3,850 views15 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Двум молодым иностранцам грозит до 15 лет За что их задержали → https://onlinebrest.by/novosti/dvum-molodym-inostrantsam-grozit-do-15-let-za-chto-ih-zaderzhali

🔥6🤯4❤3👏2

12 Nov 2026, 18:48 UTC≈3,800 views4 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Женщина ехала оформлять ввоз автомобиля Чем обернулся досмотр на границе в Бресте → https://onlinebrest.by/novosti/zhenschina-ehala-oformlyat-vvoz-avtomobilya-chem-obernulsya-dosmotr-na-granitse-v-breste

❤2👍2

12 Nov 2026, 18:33 UTC≈3,540 views20 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Белоруска отомстила хозяину квартиры, погубив его кошку Что решил суд → https://onlinebrest.by/novosti/beloruska-otomstila-hozyainu-kvartiry-pogubiv-ego-koshku-chto-reshil-sud

🤬16🤯2❤1😱1

12 Nov 2026, 18:16 UTC≈3,560 views3 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Брестчанин остался без прав на пять лет Вот за что → https://onlinebrest.by/novosti/brestchanin-ostalsya-bez-prav-na-pyat-let-vot-za-chto

👏2❤1

12 Nov 2026, 15:08 UTC≈3,820 views2 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Девушка хотела снять квартиру в Пинске, но пришлось идти в милицию Что произошло → https://onlinebrest.by/novosti/devushka-hotela-snyat-kvartiru-v-pinske-no-prishlos-idti-v-militsiyu-chto-proizoshlo

❤2

12 Nov 2026, 14:40 UTC≈3,790 views13 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Глава Nvidia ушёл в отставку на фоне скандала Подробности → https://onlinebrest.by/novosti/glava-nvidia-ushel-v-otstavku-na-fone-skandala

😢8😁3❤1👍1

12 Nov 2026, 14:22 UTC≈3,770 views2 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

В Бресте милиция проверяет пост о конфликте в автобусе Что выяснилось → https://onlinebrest.by/novosti/v-breste-militsiya-proveryaet-post-o-konflikte-v-avtobuse-chto-vyyasnilos

❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 379 posts we hold for @onlinebrestby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Онлайн Брест - новости” (@onlinebrestby), 21,138 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onlinebrestby.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.