Photo, posted without a caption
😭14❤4🤓2

Channel
@onionlandd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
364subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002207893932 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onionlandd |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onionlandd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 364 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 361 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:39 | 361 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 20 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,234 reactions across 18 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👀 | 274 | 22.2% | |
| 🌚 | 256 | 20.7% | |
| 👾 | 251 | 20.3% | |
| 🦄 | 225 | 18.2% | |
| ❤ | 127 | 10.3% | |
| 🕊 | 32 | 2.59% | |
| 😭 | 32 | 2.59% | |
| 🫡 | 6 | 0.486% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 0.405% | |
| 😡 | 5 | 0.405% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 0.324% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 0.243% | |
| 🎄 | 3 | 0.243% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.243% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 0.162% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 0.162% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.081% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.081% | |
| 🤷♀ | 1 | 0.081% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.081% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,234reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2025 to 28 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @onionlandd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 August 2025 to 28 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Photo, posted without a caption
😭14❤4🤓2
what are we doing with the botting bro 😭
kinda funny how no channels mentioned this only vx underground did and they provided the above list as the exploits stolen which is not true at all but yh whatever lets talk abt john lick g
👀271🌚256👾251🦄223😭5❤2
This week the us gov froze assets of @opzero_en .Opzero has been operating as an exploit broker for years but was attacked by the us recently due to buying 8 secret exploits from some us company employee. Its not clear or public yet what those exploits were but they include a telegram 1 click (or maybe 0 click) RCE and possibly a signal 0/1 click RCE. The telegram RCE was acquired by opzero around summer of 2025 and…
❤4
RIP to Bob man peace be upon him. Idrk what to say one of the realest and kindest people ive ever met on here can’t believe that he is gone. Prayers to his family and friends. We love you @xmrwhore ❤️ If you are using please try be aware of what you are taking and be familiar with Harm Reduction or ideally try to stop too many souls lost over this bs.
🕊32❤1🫡1
This flaw has existed for years but now every1 knows abt it so be aware its very easy to do and ppl will be trying to hit each other with it left and right
❤5
STAY SAFE Telegram has a proxy flaw which can expose your ip address.
❤8
Happy new year everyone, may all our plays land this year
❤11🍾3
Merry Christmas everybody 🎄🎄
❤12❤🔥3🎄3
I highly suggest avoiding com hosting services (and most kind of com services tbh). 9/10 times they are either shit or drop shipped, privrdp is a good example for both. Ran by TheCommNews admin ,who has 0 knowledge about servers, PrivRDP is a falsely advertised shitty service that drop ships from a horrible rdp provider. Everyone and their mother is running a service like stick to posting news dude 😭 P.S Photos aren…
❤14❤🔥1🥰1
Oh shi didnt realise we hit 400 subs preciate it
❤12🦄2💊1
Crazyrdp is more than likely seized past rdps you had with them have been wiped but if you had any currently active ones keep in mind that theres a good chance glowies have everything you had in there. RIP crazy it was a long run. GOOD LUCK JANE
😭6❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @onionlandd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Onionland” (@onionlandd), 364 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onionlandd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.