Ребят, группа не умерла😐 Просто последние месяцы мы немного... ебаш7️⃣и
🔥95❤21👍15🫡8😁3👎2

Channel
@onination_squad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,998subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001344550781 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onination_squad |
| Created | 21 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onination_squad |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 2,998 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 2,999 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 2,997 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 13 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
647 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 153 | 23.6% | |
| ❤ | 126 | 19.5% | |
| 🤣 | 118 | 18.2% | |
| 😁 | 100 | 15.5% | |
| 👍 | 53 | 8.19% | |
| 🗿 | 21 | 3.25% | |
| custom 5210956306952758910 | 19 | 2.94% | |
| 🍌 | 12 | 1.85% | |
| 😱 | 12 | 1.85% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 1.24% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 1.24% | |
| 🫡 | 8 | 1.24% | |
| custom 5427168083074628963 | 6 | 0.927% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.309% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.155% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 647reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2025 to 5 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ребят, группа не умерла😐 Просто последние месяцы мы немного... ебаш7️⃣и
🔥95❤21👍15🫡8😁3👎2
🎥Болливуд снова кормит На Netflix подъехал индийский анимационный Mahavatar Narasimha. Эпик, мифология, масштаб — всё красиво, экшоново… пока зрители не заметили «бой Кратоса с Бальдуром». Кадр Сука В кадр Даже момент с бревном спиздили... 😳 И главное: лица Santa Monica Studio имаджинировали? #cartoon #wtf #cringetopia #3D #news 🍏Onination Squad | subscribe
🤣38🗿13😁7❤4
😀Представляем вашему вниманию первый короткометражный фильм, анимированный с помощью системы управления персонажами в реальном времени, разработанной в Unreal Engine 5. Все персонажи в фильме "Little Nest" были оживлены, благодаря стараниям одного человека. Один фильм - один аниматор! С демонстрацией технологии x3 Digital Puppets можно ознакомиться по ссылке. Хотите узнать больше? Заинтересованы в сотрудничестве?…
❤16🔥4🗿3
#memes #social #funny 🍏Onination Squad | подписаться
😁26🤣23👍1
🤲 Когда руки говорят громче слов Сцена из Transferable — оригинальный проект от AgoraStudio Анимация: Valerie Lim Здесь почти всё сыграно через руки. Без слов, без пафоса — только пальцы, запястья и силует ладони. И этого хватает, чтобы показать характер и эмоцию. Один сжатый кулак или лёгкий жест — и актинг сразу выглядит живым и убедительным. ❓А у вас руки в анимации всегда остаются второстепенными? Или вы тоже…
🔥16custom 54271680830746289636❤5
🍷"Дорогая, да это я по работе смотрю." Или немного Spine/Chest магии от oyatsu 009 Автор поделился способом, как с помощью грамотной настройки Rotation и Aim Constraint можно добиться естественного движения грудной клетки (а ещё — использовать этот приём для других частей тела, например, мышц ног 💪). 📌 Настройка нижней части груди: Rotation Constraint по оси X (Shoulder) Post Original Local → Local Influence: 1…
👍15custom 521095630695275891010❤9🍌2
Рилтайм физика в Autodesk Maya Astral God Physics от ANIMATRIX STUDIO — плагин, который делает джиггл и физику в #Maya за тебя. ✏️ Jiggle, FK цепочки, коллизии, ресеты — всё в пару кликов. 💵 Стоит 40 баксов. 👀 Подробнее — в видосе. Инфу вам дали, а дальше — сами давайте 😺 #scripts 🍏Onination Squad | подписаться
❤10🔥9custom 52109563069527589103
😵Впервые накинул физику на риг персонажа. #memes #social #cringetopia 🍏Onination Squad | подписаться
🤣18😱12😁6
GTA 7 будет такой?!🔫 Ingi Erlingsson задался вопросом, сможет ли он заапскейлить шакаленные гифки из GTA 5, чтобы они выглядели реалистично? Для эксперимента он использовал Alibaba_Wan + ComfyUI и Cseti's killer upscaling workflow ⚡️ Результат оказался впечатляющим: старые «шакаленные» гифки из GTA 5 превратились в картинку, напоминающую реалистичные кадры из трейлера будущего AAA-проекта. Теперь представьте, что …
🤔8🗿5❤4
Лицевая анимация изнутри😐 Если вы когда-нибудь хотели посмотреть, конечно, да. #2D #cartoon #social #funny 🍏Onination Squad | подписаться
😁24🍌10🤣6custom 52109563069527589103
😂ОНИМАТОРЫ В С Ё! Ведь уже и 3D-художники сами оживляют своих персонажей 🙂 Zaki Fathan скульптит собственных персонажей в ZBrush, а для анимации использует Grok — без участия аниматора, чисто с нейронкой. 🔖 Наглядный пример, как быстро можно превратить статическую модель в живую сцену. #info #3D #social 🍏Onination Squad | подписаться
🔥17🤣10
🚶♂️Доброе утро, Ониматоры! Аниматор Maple продолжает прокачивать 2D аниме-стилистику 3D анимацией👀 Как пишет автор: “fake everything off cam” — всё, что не видно камере, можно не прорабатывать. 🍑 В свежем видосе — аниме-девочка виртуозно шинкует фрукты. ✏️ Риг: Caesar — @GarfMaii #3D #2D #anime #Blender 🍏Onination Squad | подписаться
👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @onination_squad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,143,124 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@onination_squad named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Onination Squad” (@onination_squad), 2,998 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onination_squad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.