Channel
@ongehoordnl
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,769subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 27 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001756363029 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ongehoordnl |
| Description | 🔴 Kijk Ongehoord Nieuws • Di & do 12:15 én 13:20, NPO 1 • Steun ons & doneer!👇🏻 ongehoordnederland.tv/doneer Het laatste nieuws van ON op Telegram – een onafhankelijk steunkanaal ↩️Twitter/FB |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ongehoordnl |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 1,769 | no change |
| 27 Sept 2026, 18:47 | 1,769 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
269 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 108 | 40.1% | |
| 👍 | 57 | 21.2% | |
| 🤬 | 27 | 10.0% | |
| 👏 | 23 | 8.55% | |
| 🥴 | 10 | 3.72% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 3.35% | |
| 🤮 | 7 | 2.60% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 1.86% | |
| 🖕 | 4 | 1.49% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 1.49% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.12% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.12% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 1.12% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.743% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.743% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.743% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 269 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2025 to 12 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ongehoord Nederland ziet haar online bereik en kijkcijfers in 2025 explosief stijgen, online met wel 130%. Ook is er een toename van 20% in kijkcijfers dit TV-seizoen. Geweldig, dank voor het kijken allemaal! ongehoordnederland.tv/nieuws/ongehoord-nederland-online-cijfers-en-bereik-als-komeet-omhoog-in-2025
❤49👍14🍾2🎉2👏2🤮1
BEKIJK NU Vader Rob Muntz (62), zoon Engel (28) en vriend Huub (25) reizen naar Transnistrië: de laatste militaire parade van de Russen op Europees grondgebied. Een hachelijke roadtrip vol KGB-agenten, wedding crashing, vechtpartijen, AK-47’s en corrupte douaniers. Kijk de hele documentaire hier: youtu.be/QneuvXzp82Q
❤9🤔3
Krankzinnige rassenwetten in Zuid-Afrika tegen de blanke bevolking in onder andere het onderwijs, bij werkgevers en bij de overheid. De mainstream media zwijgt. In de studio reageert Peter Vlemmix: “dit is pure discriminatie, marxistische ideologie en ontzettend gevaarlijk!” Ongehoord Nieuws gemist? Kijk de hele uitzending terug op NPO Start: npo.nl/start/serie/on...
🤬10❤4
Overheid lakt informatie over AZC’s zwart! Tijdens onderzoek naar problemen omtrent AZC’s trof Joost Niemöller bijna compleet zwartgelakte documenten aan. Wel leest hij het zorgwekkende bericht: “Het zal niet lang duren tot er een zwaar incident zal plaatsvinden.” Ongehoord Nieuws gemist? Kijk de hele uitzending terug op NPO Start: npo.nl/start/serie/on...
😱9❤3🤮3
Energietransitie sloopt het dorp Moerdijk. Het eeuwenoude dorp moet verdwijnen voor de uitbreiding van het industriegebied. Dit betekent dat de 1100 bewoners op zoek moeten naar een andere plek. Bewoners zijn woedend: "Voor meneer Jetten moet het hele dorp verdwijnen."
🤬17❤3💯2
Zondag 23 november 2025 wordt een middag vol spektakel, muziek en echte Sinterklaasvreugde. Ongehoord Nederland presenteert met trots: de Vet Coole Sintshow – Circus 🎪. Een interactieve, muzikale show vol energie, humor en gezelligheid voor jong en oud. Met Diego – de coolste Piet van Nederland, Bart Juwett – buikspreker en entertainer, en natuurlijk Sinterklaas zelf. 📍 DS Eventcenter, Culemborg 📅 Zondag 23 novembe…
❤7🫡3🥴2💯1
Veel ophef rondom onze omroep de afgelopen dagen. Hoe zit het echt? Opheldering van Peter Vlemmix en Raisa Blommestijn.
👏9
Exclusief live interview met de vrijgesproken Jan Roos tijdens Ongehoord Nieuws. “Ik ben als een schoft en misdadiger behandeld en ik eis excuses!”
❤6
Heeft protesteren in Nederland nog zin? Tegenstanders van nieuwe asielzoekerscentra laten hun stem horen, maar maakt het nog verschil? Volgens Richard van der Elst wel: “Als we beseffen wat de macht van de massa is, dan kunnen we echt iets forceren.”
👍11❤3👏3
In een tijd waarin vrijheid steeds vaker wordt ingeruild voor zekerheid, blijft één man zich uitspreken en weigert hij te zwijgen. Zijn vasthoudendheid heeft hem al meerdere keren in aanraking gebracht met de autoriteiten. In het ruige noorden van Nederland, waar ooit een volk leefde zonder heer of meester, praat wetenschapsjournalist, fotograaf en vrijdenker Rypke Zeilmaker over zijn scherpe kritiek op klimaatbelei…
👍13❤3
Wat vind jij de meest effectieve manier van verzet tegen de komst van een AZC?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
De komst van een asielzoekerscentrum (AZC) roept vaak uiteenlopende reacties op. Er zijn verschillende manieren waarop inwoners hun stem kunnen laten horen. Wat vind jij de meest effectieve manier van verzet tegen de komst van een AZC? Stem mee via on.peiling.tv/poll/wat-vind-... Kijk voor de uitslag morgen naar Ongehoord Nieuws om 12.15 uur live op NPO 1.
👍7❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ongehoordnl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Wat vind jij de meest effectieve manier van verzet tegen de komst van een AZC?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2025 to 12 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ongehoord Nederland TV” (@ongehoordnl), 1,769 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ongehoordnl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.