GRANDE KIMI! 🇮🇹 FIRST GRAND PRIX WINNN WHAT A BEAUTIFUL RACE
🏆4❤2🎉2

Channel
@onetweIve
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
299subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003506964645 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onetweIve |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 12 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onetweIve |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 299 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 300 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 300 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 12 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
157 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5260725928417330324 | 35 | 22.3% | |
| custom 5422808128628487601 | 23 | 14.6% | |
| 🏆 | 23 | 14.6% | |
| 🎉 | 20 | 12.7% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 10.8% | |
| custom 5375520272411553024 | 16 | 10.2% | |
| custom 5343614914579697967 | 11 | 7.01% | |
| 👾 | 9 | 5.73% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.91% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2026 to 15 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @onetweIve. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 January 2026 to 15 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
GRANDE KIMI! 🇮🇹 FIRST GRAND PRIX WINNN WHAT A BEAUTIFUL RACE
🏆4❤2🎉2
And just like that, a new history is made. Congratulations KIMI ANTONELLI, the youngest grand prix pole sitter in formula one history.
❤3🎉2🏆2
What a great race we got there guys! Congratulations on our P2 Kimi Antonellis portrayers 🔥🏆🥈
🎉3🏆3❤2👾2
P2 BABYY
YUHUUU
PEGANGAN TANGAN
SIAP SIAP P2
ㅤㅤ Today didn't start well for us, but we made a great comeback in Qualifications. Congratulations Kimi Antonelli and all his potrayers. It's P2 for race day in Australia!! 🏎 🟩
🎉2👾2👍1
Sticker, posted without a caption
A massive shout-out and a heartfelt thank you to @Rapninha! We want to formally recognize your incredible contributions to the creation and launch of OTEC. Your dedication went far beyond a single task; you were instrumental in nearly every aspect of this project. From the initial conceptual stages to the final execution, your willingness to jump in and help with almost everything was the driving force that brought …
🏆6❤2🎉2👍2👾2
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ 𝘔𝘦𝘦𝘵 𝘠𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘊𝘢𝘱𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴! NAME : Mikhail R. T. Rodeheaver DIVISION : Exchequer 𝘚𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘥𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘺. 𝘓𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘩𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘺, 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘦. 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘶𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘯𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘨𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘴 ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ 𝘗𝘙𝘖𝘛𝘌𝘚𝘛 𝘏𝘌𝘈𝘙𝘋, 𝘙𝘌𝘚𝘖𝘓𝘝𝘌𝘚 𝘗𝘓𝘈𝘕𝘕𝘌𝘋 ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ 𝘚𝘜𝘊𝘊𝘌𝘚𝘚 𝘈𝘊𝘏𝘐𝘌𝘝𝘌𝘋 ㅤㅤㅤ
custom 526072592841733032410custom 53755202724115530246custom 54228081286284876015🏆2👾2custom 53436149145796979672❤1🎉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @onetweIve. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 918,745 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“One Twelve EC” (@onetweIve), 299 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onetweIve.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.