Channel
@onepieceDBot
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002201495028 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @onepieceDBot @wantedlist |
| Description | 本频道只负责相关发布信息，真假自行甄别 ✅悬赏通缉，揭露事实，曝光真相！ EN:List of missing/rewarded persons, looking for various missin ✅独家专档，不惧任何威胁 EN:Exclusive products, not afraid of any threats #曝光 #悬赏 #通缉 #奖金猎人 #尋人 #失蹤 |
| Created | 11 June 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onepieceDBot |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 2 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 2 | first reading |
2 posts held, back to 11 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
需要发悬赏或曝光联系投稿机器人： @onepieceD_Bot ♾ 悬赏一律收费 5️⃣0️⃣🔤🔤🔤，避免一些脑残过来天天打嘴炮。 ✅曝光投稿不收取任何费用 大家如果遇到不公对待的时候一定要选择曝光，曝光不一定会有结果的，但是不曝光是一定没结果的，当然那种被骗几十块几百块那种就别发了，就当买个教训吧。 👁🗨关于一些网友投稿的内容，小编只能大概的判断，自行判断真假希望广大网友自己能分别是非，可以信，但是不能全信，之所以发出来供大家阅读，主要还是为了防止更多人踩坑！！ 💻帖子内容分类这一块，毕竟萝卜白菜各有所爱，没办法保证发的帖子内容你一定喜欢，所以建议大家喜欢的多看看，不喜欢的就划过，不喜勿喷！！ 💛其次就是祝愿来到东南亚淘金的兄弟们早日上岸！快钱只适合短期赚，不适合长期赚，如果在国内没啥事的兄弟们建议你们见好就收！！要相信一句话，常在河边站哪有不湿鞋。 🆘最后恳请各大园区的公司，善待自己的通报，不要在外残害国人，…
Channel created
Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @onepieceDBot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,367,372 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Missing/Wanted Person List 失蹤/悬赏人員啟示” (@onepieceDBot), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onepieceDBot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.