По BF Bulletin: сравнение уэйка в пятерке и бф6
🔥55👍11❤3🤔2
Signed Danila

Channel
@onebattlefield
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
11,359subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001640382263 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onebattlefield |
| Description | Первый по Battlefield. Чатик: https://t.me/+bRp9neZBmR82ODli |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onebattlefield |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 11,359 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 11,365 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 11,367 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 11,365 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 11,370 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 11,374 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 11,374 | first reading |
35 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (1 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 198,210 |
| Reactions total | 3,719 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 04:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,743 reactions across 30 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 1,031 | 37.6% | |
| 👍 | 419 | 15.3% | |
| ❤ | 357 | 13.0% | |
| 🔥 | 284 | 10.4% | |
| 🤡 | 230 | 8.38% | |
| 🤔 | 111 | 4.05% | |
| 🗿 | 79 | 2.88% | |
| 🎉 | 76 | 2.77% | |
| 🤯 | 66 | 2.41% | |
| 👎 | 43 | 1.57% | |
| 🤬 | 39 | 1.42% | |
| 🫡 | 6 | 0.219% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.036% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.036% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,719reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
По BF Bulletin: сравнение уэйка в пятерке и бф6
🔥55👍11❤3🤔2
Signed Danila
Дата релиза убийцы батлы назначена на 10 сентября - в раннем доступе. Те, кто играли в плейтест Wardogs - давайте серьезно, как вам игра?
🤯39🤣27👍7👎4❤2🗿1
Signed Danila
Перезалив трейлера в ТГ
🔥37❤3👎1
Signed Артем 🕊️ Айдинян 🦄
Лэйаут Уэйка выглядит так
🔥59👍7❤2
Signed Danila
Разработчики также дропнули геймплейный трейлер Острова Уэйк Смотрим! https://youtu.be/I4tHPByfAZk?si=JNKUbJ29-G54neZ-
🔥51❤5👍3👎1
Signed Danila
Судя по всему, это была ошибка - вернули и подборку с тдм и царем горы, и эти режимы в кастомный поиск. Превосходства и штурма по прежнему нет. Официальных комментариев на эту тему не поступало.
🤬34🤣12❤3👍2
Signed Danila
«Иногда лучше просто взять паузу. Загляни через месяц или два.» EA (c)
🗿75🤣39👍8🔥2🫡1
Signed Danila
Ставь лайк если ждешь удаления захвата из кастомного поиска
👍213🤣42🤯7🤔1
Signed Danila
BF Bulletin: из кастомного поиска удалили все мелкие режимы. Всего их осталось четыре.
🤣122🤯17👍5🗿3❤1👏1🔥1🤬1
Signed Danila
Сегодня из кастомного поиска пропало Превосходство))) Из мелких режимов остались тдм и вернулся царь горы
🤣108🤔8🤬2👍1
Signed Danila
Очередной пример того, как Steam защищает своих пользователей от недобросовестных разработчиков.
❤161🎉22🤣18👍9🤡8
Signed 1BF
Вся серия Battlefield по огромным скидкам 😱 Практически вся серия Battlefield участвует в распродаже: https://go.igm.gg/tq87a 💥 до −95% на классические части ▫️Battlefield 1 Revolution9️⃣0️⃣ ▫️Battlefield 20429️⃣0️⃣ ▫️Battlefield 6 5️⃣0️⃣ ▫️Battlefield 3 Premium Edition9️⃣0️⃣ Самое время проверить, кто всё ещё умеет летать на вертолёте… и не врезаться в первый же небоскрёб.
🤡50❤9👍5🤔1
Signed Danila
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @onebattlefield. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Выбираем кого еще ЕА надо продать
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 318,683 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“1BF | Battlefield 6” (@onebattlefield), 11,359 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onebattlefield.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.