6 measurements spanning 9 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,582–3,597 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 02:29
3,584
-4
12 Aug 2026, 05:33
3,588
-2
9 Aug 2026, 10:11
3,590
-4
6 Aug 2026, 13:34
3,594
-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:34
3,595
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:48
3,595
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.4%
avg views ÷ 3,584 subscribers
Avg views / post
732
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
22 (20 February 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
6,588
Reactions total
92
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
205 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
94
45.9%
👍
57
27.8%
🔥
22
10.7%
👌
18
8.78%
❤🔥
14
6.83%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 208reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎯Bispecific Antibodies in cancer treatments
🔎مقدمه و اهمیت :
این آنتیبادیها توانایی اتصال همزمان به دو آنتیژن متفاوت را دارند؛ یکی بر روی سلول تومور و دیگری بر روی سلولهای ایمنی.
⚙️مکانیسم عمل:
هدایت سلولهای T به سمت تومور ( معمولا با هدف گیری CD3)، درگیری سلولهای ایمنی مثل NK و ماکروفاژها، غلبه بر فرار ایمنی مثل هدفگیری همزمان PD-L1 و VEGF
🩸وضعیت فعلی درمانها:
در سرطانهای خونی مانند ALL و لنفوم ها و…
📌 بهروزرسانی راهنمای زنده ASCO برای درمان مولتیپل میلوما (ژوئن ۲۰۲۶)
🎯 هدف مطالعه:
ارائه جدیدترین توصیههای مبتنی بر شواهد برای درمان بیماران مبتلا به مولتیپل میلوما و بررسی جایگاه درمانهای نوین در بیماران عودکننده/مقاوم.
🔰 بررسی اجمالی:
🔹 نتایج مطالعه MajesTEC-3 منجر به بهروزرسانی راهنمای زنده ASCO شد.
🔹 ایمونوتراپیها، شامل CAR-T و Bispecific antibodies، در اولین عود بیماری جایگاه پررنگتری پیدا کردهاند.
🔹…
📚کتاب جدید و ارزشمند:
ASCO-SEP
American Society of Clinical Oncology
2026
#ASCO
🎗️با کانال انجمن علمی دانشجویی رادیوانکولوژی شبکه نخبگان ایران همراه باشید
| @oncology_association |
🔍 سرطان آپاندیس: آگاهی، تشخیص زودهنگام و چشم انداز
سرطان آپاندیس (Appendiceal Cancer) یکی از نادرترین بدخیمیهای دستگاه گوارش است که کمتر از یک درصد از تومورهای گوارشی را تشکیل میدهد. براساس مطالعات اپیدمیولوژیک، میزان بروز این سرطان حدود ۱ تا ۲ مورد در هر ۱۰۰ هزار نفر در سال برآورد میشود. با وجود شیوع پایین، شواهد اخیر نشان میدهد که بروز این بیماری طی دو دهه گذشته، به ویژه در افراد زیر ۵۰ سال، روندی افزایشی داشت…
✴️ مرگزایی مصنوعی (Synthetic Lethality)
🔍 با یک مثال ساده شروع کنیم...
تصور کنید شهری دو پل خروجی دارد.
اگر یکی از پلها بسته شود، رفتوآمد همچنان از طریق پل دوم ادامه پیدا میکند و مشکلی ایجاد نمیشود. اما اگر پل دوم نیز بسته شود، دیگر هیچ راه خروجی وجود ندارد و شهر کاملاً محاصره میشود.
سلولها نیز برای ترمیم آسیبهای DNA از مسیرهای جایگزین استفاده میکنند. تا زمانی که حداقل یکی از این مسیرها فعال باشد، سلول می…
📄Long-Term Follow-Up of JCOG1008: Weekly vs 3-Weekly Cisplatin in Postoperative High-Risk Head & Neck Cancer
🔹 سؤال مطالعه
آیا رژیم سیسپلاتین هفتگی (40 mg/m²) همزمان با رادیوتراپی، از نظر اثربخشی در بیماران High-risk postoperative LA-SCCHN با رژیم استاندارد 100 mg/m² هر 3 هفته قابل مقایسه است؟
✅طراحی مطالعه:
فاز II/III، رندومایز، Non-inferiority
261 بیمار
پیگیری میانه: 5.6 سال
❇️نتایج کلیدی:
⚜معیار Overall Survi…
📚#کتاب جدید و ارزشمند:
Cancer Research Guidance for Clinicians and Researchers
🖊نویسندگان:
Jefrey Huang,Heather S.L. Jim
📆سال انتشار:
2026
📇انتشارات: springer
📎اگر در حوزه انکولوژی فعالیت میکنید، این کتاب یکی از کاملترین منابع جدید برای یادگیری پژوهش در سرطان است.
🔹 آنچه در این کتاب خواهید یافت:
• طراحی انواع مطالعات (RCT، Cohort، Case Report، Meta-analysis و...)
• اصول آمار، اپیدمیولوژی و تحلیل دادهها
• کار…
#معرفی_سایت
🔬 پلتفرم OncoMarks یک بانک اطلاعاتی جامع برای کارآزماییهای بالینی انکولوژی است که مهمترین مطالعات بالینی مرتبط با حوزه سرطان را در یک مجموعهی منظم گرد هم آورده است.
🗂 کارآزماییها بر اساس محل تومور و زیرشاخههای تخصصی دستهبندی شدهاند تا یافتن مطالعات مرتبط ساده و سریع باشد.
⭐️ ویژگی متمایز این پلتفرم، خلاصههای موضوعمحور برای هر کارآزمایی است که در کنار جزئیات کاملی همچون طراحی و نوع مطالعه، جمعی…
🦴 ماه آگاهی از سارکوم؛ شناخت یک سرطان نادر اما مهم
سارکوم (Sarcoma) گروهی از سرطانهای نادر است که از بافتهای همبند بدن مانند استخوان، عضله، چربی، غضروف، تاندون، رباط، عروق خونی و اعصاب منشأ میگیرد. تاکنون بیش از ۷۰ زیرگروه مختلف از سارکوم شناسایی شده است که هر یک ویژگیهای بیولوژیکی و روشهای درمانی متفاوتی دارند.
اگرچه سارکوم تنها حدود ۱ درصد از کل سرطانهای بزرگسالان را تشکیل میدهد، اما در کودکان، نوجوانان و …
📚#کتاب
HANDBOOK OF BRAIN TUMOR CHEMOTHERAPY,
MOLECULAR THERAPEUTICS, AND IMMUNOTHERAPY
🖊نویسندگان:
HERBERT B. NEWTON
📆سال انتشار:
2026
🎗️با کانال انجمن علمی دانشجویی رادیوانکولوژی شبکه نخبگان ایران همراه باشید
| @oncology_association |
درست✅ X-ray Treatment (6 MV) درست است، زیرا در این روش Electron Beam به یک Metal Target برخورد میکند و Bremsstrahlung Radiation تولید میشود.
غلط ❌ Electron Treatment (6 MeV): از Metal Target استفاده نمیکند؛ الکترونها پس از عبور از Scattering Foil مستقیماً برای درمان به کار میروند.
غلط ❌ Proton Treatment: با LINAC Treatment Head و Metal Target تولید نمیشود و از شتابدهندههای پروتون استفاده میکند.
غلط ❌ Neutron…
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @oncology_association. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
کدام گزینه درباره انواع Hypoxia در تومورها صحیح است؟
Chronic Hypoxia عمدتاً ناشی از ناپایداری جریان خون در عروق تومور است.16%
Acute Hypoxia در اثر فاصله زیاد سلولها از عروق خونی ایجاد میشود.14%
Chronic(Diffusion-limited) Hypoxia زمانیست که مصرف اکسیژن تومور از ظرفیت اکسیژنرسانی عروق فراتر رود61%
Acute Hypoxia معمولاً در عروق طبیعی و سازمانیافته مشاهده میشود.9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 181,121 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“انجمن علمی دانشجویی رادیوانکولوژی” (@oncology_association), 3,584 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oncology_association.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.