Winning iGaming creatives: what really drives CTR Why does one creative pull strong CTR while another has all the "right" ingredients – a bonus, bright visuals, a polished layout – yet barely gets clicks? It’s rarely about a magic design formula. For push traffic, performance often comes down to the headline, icon, and a clear, easy-to-grasp offer. With video, the first few seconds do the heavy lifting: if there’s…

Channel
OnClickA Ad Network
@onclicka_ad_network
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,200subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001997385065 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onclicka_ad_network |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onclicka_ad_network |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 1,200 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 1,198 | +5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:42 | 1,193 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 1,194 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 1,193 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 1,196 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 1,194 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 1,199 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 1,199 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 11 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Why run multiple ad formats in one campaign? Relying on a single format can limit your scale and leave valuable opportunities on the table. The real performance lift comes from using formats that complement each other across the funnel. Here’s why: 1️⃣ Different formats create more touchpoints Users respond differently to video, banners, and native ads. A mix reaches them in their preferred environment. 2️⃣ Stron…
Popunder Ads: main requirements for interstitial formats This is a display ad format. It looks like a banner that covers the full screen of the device. It works on mobile and desktop devices. 🔵Name your Popunder ad as you like. This name will only be viewed within our service to help you differentiate one ad from another 🔵Size: size of the interstitial ad. Affects the target device variety available. 🔵Rotation ty…
Poll, posted without a caption
Time for a quick check-in 😉 We all know testing is key. So, let's see what's trending. Which ad format is currently your main focus? Vote in the poll and see what others are testing on Onclicka 👇
Telegram Mini App Ads: when this format performs best⬇️ Telegram Mini Apps are quickly becoming an attractive ad placement for performance marketers. Users don’t have to leave Telegram, install a separate app, or go through a long conversion flow to complete the desired action. Everything happens right inside the messenger. Scenarios where mini apps drive strong performance 1️⃣Actions in just a few clicks This fo…
I-CON: key highlights and takeaways Let’s skip the long intro – our team is here to share how I-CON went, what stood out, and what we’re taking away from the event. Read on – and don't forget to hit like 👍 Armen Avetisyan 🟡 Limassol greeted us with incredible weather, and after the conference, I’m feeling energized and full of fresh ideas. I had the chance to connect with so many great people and discuss potentia…
🗣️I-CON is officially underway — and we’re ready to connect 🗣️ Got traffic to scale? Offers to push? Monetization goals to hit? Come by Booth ME10, say hi, and let’s talk real opportunities. We’ll swap insights, share ideas, and figure out how to turn your traffic into bigger results. And yes — the merch is here too. Stop by, grab something cool, and take a piece of Onclicka home with you. Meet our team on-site:…
MAC is already in full swing and the Onclicka team is on the ground and on the move. If you’re here too, let’s connect 💬 Whether you want to talk traffic, scale new funnels, explore partnerships, swap insights on performance, or just meet the people behind the numbers — MAC is the place to do it. Meet our team at MAC: 🚀 Malik Khatsiev — Head of Sales 🚀 Azamat Borlakov — Senior Sales Manager DM them now to lock…
We'll be at I-CON 🇨🇾 The team is packing their bags for Limassol — and we can't wait to meet you there. Two days of traffic, monetization, performance marketing, and scalable partnerships on a sunny Mediterranean island. Sounds like a plan, right? Affiliates, media buyers, publishers, advertisers — make sure to stop by Booth ME10 and let’s talk growth. Catch us on-site: 🖤Armen Avetisyan — Team Lead Onclicka publ…
TES Marbella is over, but we want to keep the great atmosphere going! ❤️ Whether we met you in person at our booth or you couldn't make it to the conference this time, we want to share the post-event energy with everyone. To help you boost new strategies and scale your results, we are giving you an extra boost for your campaigns🪙 Make any deposit and get a 6% bonus to your balance. It's the perfect time to test new…
TES Marbella 2026 is officially a wrap! ⚡ Compared to Prague, we met many new faces this year. The vibe at TES is shifting slightly - it feels more focused on practical business tasks and long-term partnerships. Here are a few trends we noticed during our booth discussions: 🧲Precise targeting: Paying attention to details like specific GEOs, browsers, and languages is becoming a standard way to optimize budgets. 💵Co…
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @onclicka_ad_network. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,340,756 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@onclicka_ad_network named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OnClickA Ad Network” (@onclicka_ad_network), 1,200 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onclicka_ad_network.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.