Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

On-chain Sniper

@onchainsniper

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,029subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001872353246
TypeChannel
Username@onchainsniper
Description👁‍🗨 Следим за блокчейном 👁‍🗨 Отслеживаем транзакции китов и все их перемещения. Для приглашения друзей https://t.me/+NYKx5ajh0kk2Njli Админ для связи @SniperAdmin
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/onchainsniper

Growth

6,0296,0316,0307 Aug 2026, 16:54 — 6,031 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:01 — 6,031 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 23:07 — 6,029 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:547 Aug 2026, 23:07
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,029–6,031 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 23:076,029-2
7 Aug 2026, 17:016,031no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:546,031first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,480
Links
2,650

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

269 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5620.8%
😱4717.5%
🤯4014.9%
👍3914.5%
💯176.32%
165.95%
🙏165.95%
😭155.58%
🤩93.35%
👌62.23%
🤔41.49%
🥰20.743%
👏10.372%
🕊10.372%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 269reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Jul 2026, 12:16 UTC972 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Pump.fun сегодня снова продали 122,498 $SOL ($10.08M)! Всего Pump.fun уже продали 4,656,826 $SOL ($794.8M) по средней цене $170.7. https://arkm.com/explorer/entity/pump-fun 👁‍🗨 @onchainsniper

🤯9😱5🤔3

8 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC931 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Что можно сделать с $86? Трейдер 0xeee2 превратил всего $86 в $1,6М — доходность составила 19 061х. Он потратил $86 на покупку 17,5М $CASHCAT, затем продал 3,6К $CASHCAT за $390,5К. и до сих пор удерживает 13,8М $CASHCAT стоимостью около $1,24М. Общая прибыль: $1,6М (19 061х). Кошельки: 0xeee29d1a6fa5873065ad8789c6e15231b48318a0 0x32c34a18cc5fd58c0ece1e472e9bf95de8906a8a 👁‍🗨 @onchainsniper

🔥127👍2

3 Jul 2026, 06:48 UTC961 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Кошелек, предположительно связанный с Тимом Дрейпером, перевел 1,000 $BTC ($61.82M) на Coinbase Prime. Тим Дрейпер — известный венчурный инвестор, который приобрел около 29,656 $BTC (из конфискованных активов Silk Road) на аукционе Службы маршалов США в 2014 году. Средняя цена покупки составила около $632 за 1 $BTC, а общая сумма сделки — $18.7M. На пике стоимости эти 29,656 $BTC оценивались в $3.74B, а сейчас их

🔥12😱4👍31

3 Jul 2026, 06:45 UTC791 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Новый кошелек 0xe069 открыл лонг с плечом 20x на 230,583 $SOL стоимостью $18.81M. Менее чем за сутки позиция уже показывает прибыль в $818K. Цена ликвидации: $67.14. https://hypurrscan.io/address/ 👁‍🗨 @onchainsniper

🔥8💯6👍3

3 Jul 2026, 06:44 UTC687 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Клифтон Коллинз перевел 500 $BTC ($30.85M) на Coinbase Prime. Клифтон Коллинз — ирландский наркоторговец, известный тем, что в 2011–2012 годах купил около 6,000 $BTC по средней цене около $5 за монету. Он распечатал приватные ключи на бумаге и спрятал их внутри рыболовных удочек. После ареста по обвинениям, связанным с наркотиками, власти конфисковали его активы, но так и не смогли получить доступ к приватным ключ

🤩9👌4😱42

1 Jul 2026, 05:24 UTC631 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

FG Nexus потеряла более $86.6M на своей ставке на #Ethereum. В августе–сентябре 2025 года FG Nexus приобрела 50,770 $ETH ($196M) по средней цене $3,860. Затем, начиная с ноября 2025 года, компания начала распродавать активы, продав в общей сложности 51,145 $ETH ($109.4M) по средней цене $2,138. Общий убыток составил $86.6M. https://arkm.com/explorer/entity/fg-nexus 👁‍🗨 @onchainsniper

🤯12😭5😱31👏1

1 Jul 2026, 05:22 UTC567 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

После того как кит удерживал $ETH более 5 месяцев, он наконец капитулировал. Более 5 месяцев назад кошелек 0xF3cd купил 2,468 $ETH ($8.21M) по цене $3,327. Ночью он продал все 2,468 $ETH ($3.88M) по $1,572, зафиксировав убыток в размере $4.33M. https://arkm.com/explorer/address/ 👁‍🗨 @onchainsniper

🤯10😱10💯5

1 Jul 2026, 05:21 UTC590 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Киты шортят $BTC. Кошелек 0xaeaa открыл 20x шорт на 1,100 $BTC ($64.95M). Цена ликвидации: $67,914.56. https://hypurrscan.io/address/ 👁‍🗨 @onchainsniper

🙏9👍6😭51

1 Jul 2026, 05:20 UTC595 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Не поддавайтесь FOMO при покупке «монет знаменитостей». Трейдер CCv4xA потратил 50K $USDC на покупку 2.47M $TJR практически на самом пике. Позже TJRTrades заявил во время прямого эфира, что $TJR — не его монета, после чего токен резко обвалился. В итоге трейдер продал все 2.47M $TJR всего за 4,886 $USDC, потеряв $45K всего за 10 часов. https://dexscreener.com/solana/ 👁‍🗨 @onchainsniper

👍6💯4😱4

29 Jun 2026, 13:26 UTC747 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

BlackRock только что перевёл 7,432 $BTC ($446 млн) на Coinbase Prime. Это крупнейший однодневный чистый отток $BTC у BlackRock за всю историю. https://arkm.com/explorer/entity/blackrock 👁‍🗨 @onchainsniper

🔥113👌2

29 Jun 2026, 13:23 UTC676 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Arthur Hayes купил 6.16М $SYN ($2.2М). $SYN вырос более чем в 10 раз в июне! 👁‍🗨 @onchainsniper

😱8🔥5👍1🤔1

29 Jun 2026, 13:16 UTC771 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

После более чем года бездействия кит 4z56a1 начал покупать $PUMP, потратив 5K $SOL($358K) на покупку 242.66M $PUMP. Более года назад этот кит купил 10,957 $SOL($2.6M) по цене $237 и отправил их в стейкинг. Несмотря на получение 1,206 $SOL в виде наград за стейкинг, его позиция по-прежнему находится в убытке более чем на $1.7M (-66%) из-за падения цены. https://arkm.com/explorer/address/ 👁‍🗨 @onchainsniper

👍9😱3💯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @onchainsniper. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 963,047 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“On-chain Sniper” (@onchainsniper), 6,029 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onchainsniper.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.