Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Onchain Intel Hub

Channel

Onchain Intel Hub

@onchainintelhub

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

1,318subscribers

-29 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003042319203
TypeChannel
Username@onchainintelhub
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/onchainintelhub

Growth

1,3181,3471,332.57 August 2026 — 1,347 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,347 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,346 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,345 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,339 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,336 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,330 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,323 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,318 subscribers7 August 202631 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 24 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,314–1,351 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 10:131,318-5
28 Aug 2026, 00:041,323-7
24 Aug 2026, 16:031,330-6
18 Aug 2026, 03:121,336-3
14 Aug 2026, 19:271,339-6
11 Aug 2026, 15:221,345-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:161,346-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:221,347no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:011,347first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

854 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
41048.0%
🔥19723.1%
👍11713.7%
🙏445.15%
👏212.46%
🫡212.46%
🏆111.29%
😱60.703%
👀50.585%
👌50.585%
👎50.585%
🤝50.585%
😁20.234%
😇20.234%
💯10.117%
🤣10.117%
🥰10.117%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 854reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 20 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @onchainintelhub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 January 2026 to 20 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Feb 2026, 20:27 UTC≈1,560 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Eight months ago, Ribbit Capital sent a 41-page letter to its LPs. Not about an exit. Not about a new fund. About tokens rewiring the entire global economy. The argument was clear: every company becomes a token factory. Control the infrastructure, capture the trillions. Then reality followed. Robinhood built a blockchain. Coinbase launched agent wallets. Every major bank rushed into stablecoins. Prediction by predi

🔥2410🫡5

11 Feb 2026, 15:44 UTC≈1,780 views163 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Dear community, We are facing a personal emergency. I am dealing with health issues, and my girlfriend, who is 13 weeks pregnant with twins, has been seriously ill for over six weeks and recently developed severe pneumonia. We are incredibly grateful for the pregnancy, which is a wonderful blessing, but it was not planned. The combination of her illness and this new responsibility has understandably taken a lot of t

153🫡5👌2😇2🔥1

9 Feb 2026, 21:35 UTC≈1,280 views38 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

I’ve been sharing a lot of onchain insights, strategies, and skills with you. I caught runners using them, and also analyzed post-mortem why certain runners ran. When you combine these onchain insights and learnings with development and technology, this is what we can create together. Tech that signals how good token setups are for potential supply squeezes, as one of the many onchain strategies to apply. Similar t

🔥29👍9

7 Feb 2026, 14:32 UTC≈1,370 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

I’ve been following Nova for some time now. He’s a great memecoin analyst who warns people about memecoin risks, rugs, clusters, etc. He’s also had a lot of discussions with KOLs and shady teams because he calls them out, something I like and appreciate. He has now launched his own project $SOBAT as a test to see how far he can take it. He’s built a large community on X very quickly and is now building the project p

👍214

2 Feb 2026, 23:24 UTC≈1,490 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Guys, I’m not ignoring you. I’ve got so many charts, tickers, and squeeze-theory plays in my DMs you wouldn’t believe it. I just can’t go through all of them right now. If I haven’t replied yet, it’s not because I’m ignoring you. I need to focus on my recovery first, then the discord group, and after that, I’ll be back in full on-chain active sleuthing mode. Please don’t take it personally if I don’t reply immediatel

🔥28🫡118

2 Feb 2026, 22:48 UTC≈1,430 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

I often like to revisit my old analyses of bigger projects. Hyperliquid’s strength as of today immediately reminded me of my $ASTER post back in October. The project always felt a bit phishy. Back then, on-chain didn’t lie: early whales already took profits, signals were weakening, and the big airdrop caused confusion and sell-offs. See my onchain analysis post for more details. Yet somehow, every KOL back then was

15🔥9

1 Feb 2026, 16:09 UTC≈1,130 views106 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Hey everyone, quick update. My wife, my son, and I have all been down with the flu and fever and have been stuck in bed for the past few days. Unfortunately, it hit us pretty hard, which is why I’ve been offline for about five days. I haven’t been able to follow everything closely, but I do see the market going through a sharp dip and correction. It doesn’t look great, and these are clearly the tougher moments in t

56🙏44😱6

27 Jan 2026, 21:21 UTC≈1,690 views79 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

AFK for a bit, guys. Swamped with work and prepping a lot of legal stuff, which again reminds me that I live in the wrong country. In other news: the number of DMs I get from people who want to collaborate and tackle things from different angles is insane. There’s so much untapped skill out there. So many people genuinely want to learn, are hungry to make decisions on their own, and move away from endless shill cul

41👍16🏆11🔥11

26 Jan 2026, 23:49 UTC≈1,600 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥18👏6👍3

26 Jan 2026, 23:48 UTC≈1,470 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/binanceus/status/2015916614894624882?s=46

👀52

26 Jan 2026, 21:12 UTC≈1,500 views23 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

I’m looking to connect with people who are genuinely skilled at finding early crypto alpha on X (or other socials). On X, there is often very specific alpha to be found. This can come from tracking who certain key accounts follow, spotting early conversations around upcoming narratives, or noticing trending topics that hint at a token before it becomes widely known. With the right approach and tooling (tools, bots,

🔥18🤝5

26 Jan 2026, 20:07 UTC≈1,220 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Good traders don’t have perfect stats. They have repeatable behavior. Here is the tier 1 wallet address for the post below: HiBbwvGcGYsd3t8kkNpaicFdAcYT2rhtZrdcv38MkMLS https://x.com/cryptorinweb3/status/2015878251592274297?s=20

🔥167👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @onchainintelhub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Onchain Intel Hub” (@onchainintelhub), 1,318 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onchainintelhub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.