закрыто ! ! я думаю, что хочу закрыть канал, так как желания им заниматься не было и нет 🍓🍓 если что-то изменится, я вас оповещу ( на некоторых из вас, чей контент мне действительно очень очень нравится, я останусь подписана )
😢8❤2

Channel
@oncelovely
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001712729896 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oncelovely |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 17 September 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oncelovely |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 3 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 3 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 17 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 September 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
138 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 62 | 44.9% | |
| ❤ | 30 | 21.7% | |
| 🥰 | 16 | 11.6% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 5.80% | |
| 💋 | 5 | 3.62% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 2.90% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 2.17% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 2.17% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 2.17% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 1.45% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.725% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.725% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2022 to 24 September 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
закрыто ! ! я думаю, что хочу закрыть канал, так как желания им заниматься не было и нет 🍓🍓 если что-то изменится, я вас оповещу ( на некоторых из вас, чей контент мне действительно очень очень нравится, я останусь подписана )
😢8❤2
#HAPPYNAYEONDAY сегодня день рождения одной замечательной девушки, которая может заменить мне мир — наён ! я очень рада, что когда-то узнала о твайс и о наён. эта чудесная девочка помогает мне не сдаваться и жить дальше. не знаю, что бы я делала, если не ты. я бы положила весь мир к твоим ногам, я бы хотела, чтобы ты была счастлива, я соберу по крупицам со всей планеты счастье и подарю тебе ! ! ты безусловно заслужи…
🍓5❤2
#video #chaelisa #bp #iloveuu video is not mine ! chaelisa SOoOo 🫀🫀 I l-o-v-e them 나는 이 여자들을 사랑해, 그들은 내 인생이야
🍓3🥰2🔥1🕊1
작은 비둘기야, 정말 행복하니? 🕊️ ты правда счастлива, голубка ? 그들이 존재하는 한 나는 항상 행복할 것입니다. пока есть они, я буду всегда счастлива 당신은 그들을 사랑합니까? あなたはそれらを愛していますか? do you love them? — yeah i love them #유미주의자 #itzy
❤3🍓3🕊3💋2🥰2
https://chng.it/pTxFnjWcQp
🍓1
чувствую себя живым, когда думаю о тебе
🍓3❤1🥰1
그와의 마지막 이별, 기분이 어땠니? 🫀 ? расставаясь с нимней в последний раз, что ты чувствовала ? 아마도 . . . 한결 나아 졌어요 ? возможно . . . мне стало легче ? 당신은 기분이 좋지 않았다 あなたは気分が良くなかった you didn't feel better
🍓15💋1🥰1
☆ cr :: m1ronv . . ☆
🍓2❤1🥰1
капли размывают белые линии последнее, что осталось от ее тела когда ее уже нет, и прошло время легче дорисовывать по памяти то, что всем нужно было сохранить целым это то, что всем нужно было сохранить целым всё ещё течет кровь, тревожна и живая стекает между пальцев поднятых рук, готовых к объятиям а любовь из окна смотрит, спилась, только собака ее истошно лает покойница когда-то давно считала ее матерью. — ламп…
❤5🍓2💋1🔥1🥰1
File, posted without a caption
❤2🍓2🥰1
🫀🫀
❤2🍓2🐳2🥰1
в небольшой кофейне в доме очень тепло и вкусно пахнет кофе (?) и выпечкой? (это и логично, что в кофейне пахнет кофе, ангелина.) я люблю эти ароматы
❤3🍓2🐳1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @oncelovely. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,427,914 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“closed 사랑 딸기 ? na–na 🍓” (@oncelovely), 3 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oncelovely.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.