3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 497–513 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 01:56
511
+12
8 Aug 2026, 04:18
499
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:23
499
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 25 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
162 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
70
43.2%
👍
50
30.9%
❤
12
7.41%
😁
6
3.70%
👌
5
3.09%
🤣
4
2.47%
🤯
4
2.47%
🎉
3
1.85%
🤪
3
1.85%
👏
2
1.23%
🥰
2
1.23%
🆒
1
0.617%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
33
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 19 we hold a reading for · 42%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @omelnickiy_ai. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 March 2026 to 20 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Наткнулся на кейс с ChatGPT, от которого я буквально офигел.
Человек уронил кольцо и не смог его найти. Вместо того чтобы ползать по полу, он сфотографировал комнату и скинул фото в ChatGPT: «Уронил кольцо, помоги найти».
Фото к посту как раз оно, а фото ответ в комментариях. Попробуйте сами найти кольцо, прежде чем лезть в комментарии.
Я всматривался, увеличивал и сдался. А ChatGPT за пару секунд вернул тот же сн…
Anthropic вернул доступ к Fable 5 🥳
Если вы не успели потестировать модель во время релиза, сейчас самое время.
Моя оценка Fable 5 - это совершенно новый уровень, буквально другой класс, который на голову выше Opus 4.8 (в момент релиза было так).
Рекомендую использовать Fable 5 для оркестрации и построения архитектуры, а основные действия выполнять более дешёвыми моделями, например новым Sonnet 5, он, кстати, тоже…
Вторые сутки играем с женой в Лилу с нейросетями.
Лила, это игра-зеркало. Ты бросаешь кубик и ходишь по клеткам, а каждая клетка помогает тебе лучше понять себя: чего ты хочешь, чего боишься, где врёшь себе и что тебе мешает быть честным. Это не игра, которая говорит будущее. Это игра, которая помогает увидеть, что происходит у тебя внутри.
Вот промпт: (можно копировать нажатием на него)
Войди в роль Мастера древн…
Не могу найти, кто просил промпт на апскейл изображения. Случайно наткнулся на него.
{ “prompt”: “Upscale and redraw the input image with exact preservation of original meaning, all inscriptions, labels, designations, drawing style, and line work. Maintain precise details without alterations.”, “input_image”: “[path_or_url_to_original_image]”, “upscale_factor”: 4, “style_preservation”: true, “text_fidelity”: true, “…
В интересное время живем.
Буквально 3 дня прошло с релиза Fable 5, шикарнейшая модель стоит сказать. Как все закончилось по причине угрозы национальной безопасности США.
Официальное заявление от Антропиков можно прочитать ТУТ
The shares total 256%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Я немного выпал из канала, но решил вернуться не просто с очередной AI-новостью.
За это время я посмотрел на канал со стороны: какие посты набирали больше просмотров, реакций и комментариев, какие темы чаще всплывали в чате.
Вывод простой: вам интереснее не “что нового вышло в AI”, а что из этого реально можно применить в маркетинге, контенте, бизнесе и повседневных задачах.
Поэтому хочу перестроить канал в более …
Не модель определяет зрелость, а процессы
88% компаний уже используют ИИ хотя бы в одной функции. Но в ловушку попадают четверо из пяти: они просто прикрутили ИИ поверх старых процессов, не меняя ничего. Вопрос давно сместился с «пробовать ли?» на «на каком уровне я это использую?».
Я разобрал 12 ступеней зрелости в работе с ИИ. От скептика, который ещё не начал, до AI-native предпринимателя, который строит бизнес …
Вот так выглядит мой ChatGPT, хочешь узнать как выглядит твоя Иишка, промпт ниже 😂
Промпт: (копируется простым нажатием на текст)
Ты уже какое-то время со мной, и я хочу посмотреть, как ты выглядишь. Сделай, пожалуйста, фото в стиле случайного снимка с iPhone: без явной темы, без нарочитой композиции, просто очень обычное, даже немного неудачное фото. На снимке лёгкое размытие от движения, неравномерный свет, лёгка…
Наткнулся на мощную обнову от Telegram. Они выкатили технологию, которая позволяет собрать своего ИИ-бота за 60 секунд вообще без кода.
Но самое интересное, теперь боты могут общаться друг с другом напрямую в группах или бизнес-чатах. По сути, это нативные агентные сценарии прямо внутри телеги. Можно запускать связки без всяких Make и n8n.
Я нашел бота Lobster Father, который как раз сделан на этой базе для демонст…
👍5🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @omelnickiy_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 256%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 20 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Омельницкий | Маркетинг и Ai” (@omelnickiy_ai), 511 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/omelnickiy_ai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
