👮♀ 50 элитных хакеров. Горы аппаратуры. Пачки наличных. Силовики захватили командный пункт хакеров в Черногории При обыске дома изъяли крупную сумму денег и целый грузовик техники. Полиция Черногории обнаружила в арендованном доме в Подгорице более 50 иностранцев, сотни цифровых устройств и крупную сумму денег. — Теперь правоохранители пытаются выяснить, чем занимались находившиеся в здании люди и для чего им по…

Channel
Project Omega | ИБ
@omega_cybersec
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,920subscribers
-30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001797327784 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @omega_cybersec |
| Description | Канал о том, как защитить свою личную информацию от атак и угроз. Пригласить друга: https://t.me/+lxVRimOLcNdjODcy Связаться: @andrewtender |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/omega_cybersec |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 8,920 | -21 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 8,941 | -13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 8,954 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 8,950 | first reading |
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.01%
- avg views ÷ 8,920 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 714
- 29 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 29
- of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (19 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,712 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 781
- Videos
- 19
- Links
- 830
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 10.3%
- 3 of 29 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 0
- none — marked by hashtag only
- Median views · ads
- 744
- over 3 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 751
- over 26 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
✈️ OSINT Telegram инструменты: методики разведки и запуск через Termux на Android За два часа работы с TGStat и Telethon анонимный Telegram-канал превратился в конкретного сотрудника — через корреляцию юзернейма на четырёх платформах и анализ форвардных цепочек из слитого дампа. Статья разбирает реальный OSINT-цикл по MITRE T1593.001 и T1213.005: от единственной зацепки — юзернейма в логах — до графа связей. Инстру…
🔍 Flowsint превращает OSINT-расследование в интерактивный граф Flowsint — open-source инструмент для OSINT-расследований. Если коротко, это платформа, которая помогает собирать информацию из открытых источников (Open Source Intelligence) и, что самое главное, визуализировать связи между найденными данными в виде наглядного графа. — Это не просто сборщик информации, а настоящий интерактивный холст для аналитиков по…
🥸 Подборка книг о вирусах и защите от них Автор собирает автоматические переводы материалов по хакингу и выкладываю их на сайте библиотеки. И вот, миллионы сожженых токенов спустя, архив наполнился. В сегодняшней подборке книги как по анализу, так и по написанию малвари. Представлены книги под Mac, Android и Windows. #Book #Hacking #Reverse #AntiVirus #Malware 🦎 Project Omega
🤨 Impacket для Pentester: atexec Impacket-atexec — это инструмент выполнения команд на основе Python, поставляемый как часть коллекции Impacket, поддерживаемой Fortra. Он выполняет команды на удаленном хосте Windows, злоупотребляя службой планировщика задач Windows через интерфейс MSRPC ATSVC (TSCH). В этой статье представлена практическая, практическая прохождение Impacket-atexec, одной из самых надежных утилит уд…
📱 OSINT-фреймворк для разведки и анализа Telegram Telerecon — это Python-фреймворк для проведения OSINT-разведки в Telegram: поиска информации о пользователях, сбора сообщений, анализа каналов и построения сетей взаимодействия. — Telerecon интересен не столько как обычный Telegram scraper, сколько как полноценный OSINT pipeline — от обнаружения аккаунта и сбора сообщений до корреляции данных, анализа связей, метада…
🚠 Nulls DNS и NullsProxy — что это такое и безопасно ли использовать Сервисы вроде Nulls DNS и NullsProxy периодически всплывают в обсуждениях работы интернета и сетевых соединений. Названия звучат замысловато, но на деле речь идёт о довольно понятных технологиях. Вопрос в другом — как именно они работают и какие последствия могут возникнуть при их использовании. — Многие подключают подобные решения из любопытства…
🤒 Как создать флешку вирус в Social-Engineer Toolkit на Kali В этой статье мы рассмотрим как создать флешку вирус с помощью The Social-Engineer Toolkit на Kali Linux. Social-Engineer Toolkit (SET) — это фреймворк с открытым исходным кодом для тестирования на проникновение, предназначен для реализации атак социальной инженерии. — Мы создадим флешку вирус с автоматически выполняемой полезной нагрузкой, которая будет…
🥷 Один токен — и аккаунт ваш навсегда: хакеры продают взлом Google за $10 000 Новая атака на Gmail сохраняет доступ даже после выхода из всех устройств. Один OAuth-токен может превратить почтовый ящик Gmail в инструмент для чтения чужой переписки, перехвата кодов подтверждения и атак на связанные сервисы. — Исходный код цепочки уязвимостей с заявленными возможностями выставили на продажу на теневом форуме минимум …
❗️ CSRF атака: механика эксплуатации, обход защит и построение PoC Браузер честно отправлял session cookie вместе с «простым» запросом — сервер не проверял ничего, кроме неё. Kill chain: жертва открывает вредоносную страницу → JS вызывает document.forms[0].submit() → cookie уходит автоматически → смена email → сброс пароля → полный захват аккаунта (MITRE T1185, T1190). — Защита работает только в связке: SameSite=S…
😡 Как узнать пользователя без куки и регистрации FingerprintJS — это популярная JavaScript-библиотека с открытым исходным кодом. Её задача — собирать уникальные характеристики браузера и устройства пользователя, а затем на их основе генерировать «цифровой отпечаток» (fingerprint), который работает как стабильный идентификатор посетителя (visitorId). — Все собранные данные объединяются в одну строку, и к ней примен…
📖 Новые хакерские книги на русском Это очередное продолжение статьи «Материалы по хакингу на русском». Напомним: автор переводит топовые книги по информационной безопасности и выкладывает их на сайте библиотеки. В статье — список новых книг. #Book #Hacking #Reverse #AntiVirus 🦎 Project Omega
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @omega_cybersec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@omega_cybersec edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,125,314 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@hack_less · 227,898
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Project Omega | ИБ” (@omega_cybersec), 8,920 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/omega_cybersec.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.