Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

OMDAO Ventures

@omdao_vc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,262subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001691696827
TypeChannel
Username@omdao_vc
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/omdao_vc

Growth

3,2623,2693,265.57 August 2026 — 3,269 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,269 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,267 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,262 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,261–3,270 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 14:053,262-5
10 Aug 2026, 20:263,267-2
8 Aug 2026, 02:253,269no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:153,269first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 3,262 subscribers
Avg views / post
461
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held20 (6 April 202620 July 2026)
Views total461
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

97 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6668.0%
1818.6%
🔥88.25%
😱55.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 03:16 UTC461 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚖️ Apple подала иск против OpenAI — под ударом hardware и IPO Apple в пятницу подала иск о краже коммерческой тайны против OpenAI, обвинив компанию в систематическом переманивании сотрудников с целью получения конфиденциальных данных. В числе ответчиков назван главный hardware-директор OpenAI Тан Тан. OpenAI отрицает обвинения: «не осведомлены о доказательствах, подтверждающих обоснованность жалобы». Timing показат

6

16 Jul 2026, 05:18 UTC476 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💰 Lululemon вошла в $30 млн Series A французского стартапа Syntetica Syntetica разработала технологию переработки нейлона двух типов — Nylon 6 и Nylon 6,6 — которые обычно не поддаются раздельной сортировке в текстильных отходах. На выходе — гранулы, которые производители используют для создания пряжи. Сам стартап ткань не производит. Раунд возглавил фонд Ecotechnologies 2 под управлением Bpifrance в рамках програм

4

15 Jul 2026, 06:29 UTC425 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💰 Основатель Hinge привлёк $18 млн на новый AI-дейтинг-сервис Overtone Джастин МакЛеод, покинувший пост CEO Hinge в прошлом году, анонсировал раунд для нового проекта. Инвесторы - Match Group (материнская компания Hinge, Tinder и OkCupid), FirstMark Capital и Pace Capital. Overtone позиционирует себя не как приложение, а как голосовой AI-сервис курируемых знакомств - без профилей, свайпов и алгоритмических лент. В

5

14 Jul 2026, 23:35 UTC422 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🤖 Reflection AI подписала compute-сделку с Nebius на $1 млрд Reflection AI, американский стартап по разработке открытых AI-моделей, договорилась с европейской инфраструктурной компанией Nebius о доступе к вычислительным мощностям на базе последних чипов Nvidia. Это уже вторая крупная compute-сделка Reflection за несколько недель - незадолго до этого компания получила аналогичный доступ через SpaceX. Стартап основан

👍6

9 Jul 2026, 10:46 UTC481 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💰 Paradigm закрыла четвёртый фонд на $1.2 млрд Один из крупнейших крипто-венчуров расширяет фокус за пределы цифровых активов. Новый фонд будет инвестировать в AI, робототехнику и другие технологии наряду с криптой - заметный сдвиг для фирмы, построенной исключительно на блокчейн-ставках. Для контекста: фонд 2021 года составлял $2.5 млрд, в 2024-м Paradigm закрыла $850 млн под ранние стадии блокчейн-проектов. Нынеш

👍3

7 Jul 2026, 05:02 UTC458 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🤖 Station F запускает второй набор AI-акселератора F/ai Парижский хаб запустил программу F/ai в январе этого года, и уже в сентябре стартует второй набор. Цель та же: провести небольшую группу AI-стартапов от раннего продукта к выручке за несколько недель, ориентир - €1 млн за 6 месяцев. Первый набор показал цифры, которые сложно игнорировать: 20 команд суммарно привлекли $34 млн pre-seed, 80% основаны повторными п

3

6 Jul 2026, 05:33 UTC466 viewsread 7 August 2026

🚀 Bending Spoons вышла на Nasdaq Миланский tech-конгломерат, скупивший AOL, Vimeo, Evernote, Meetup, Eventbrite и WeTransfer, разместился на Nasdaq на этой неделе. Рыночная капитализация на пике кратко превысила $25 млрд - вдвое выше последней частной оценки в $11 млрд. Бизнес-модель нестандартная: компания покупает популярные, но проблемные продукты, перестраивает их изнутри - UX, монетизация, AI-интеграция, сокра

3 Jul 2026, 00:34 UTC541 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📈 Securitize вышла на NYSE и токенизировала собственные акции на Solana и Avalanche Компания начала торги под тикером SECZ через слияние со SPAC при поддержке Cantor Fitzgerald. В первый день акции прибавили более 8%, последняя цена - $12,75. Параллельно с листингом Securitize выпустила токенизированные версии своих акций на $266 млн на Solana и Avalanche. По словам CEO Карлоса Доминго, это крупнейшая токенизирован

👍6🔥3

2 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC469 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🏦 Standard Chartered стал первым глобальным системно значимым банком (G-SIB) с прямым доступом к USDC Банк запустил сервис, позволяющий институциональным клиентам минтить и погашать USDC через Standard Chartered напрямую - без отдельного аккаунта в Circle. Первая фаза работает через дубайский DIFC, расширение на другие рынки - по мере регуляторных одобрений. Целевые кейсы: ончейн-расчёты, трежери, управление ликвидн

👍3

1 Jul 2026, 21:28 UTC≈3,070 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🤖 Venice AI стала единорогом с первым внешним раундом на $65 млн Компания привлекла Series A при оценке $1 млрд - раунд возглавил Dragonfly, к нему присоединились Coinbase Ventures, North Island Ventures и ряд других инвесторов. Примечательно, что это первые внешние деньги в проекте. Venice предоставляет доступ к более чем 200 AI-моделям - открытым и закрытым, включая OpenAI и Anthropic - с упором на приватность: в

👍4

26 Jun 2026, 13:23 UTC625 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💰 Kraken ведёт переговоры о покупке 15% Aave Group за $71 млн Структура сделки нестандартная: Kraken планирует вложить 35 000 ETH (~$55 млн) в обмен на 250 000 токенов AAVE (~$20 млн) и 15% обыкновенных акций Aave Group — компании, которая разрабатывает и поддерживает протокол. Оценка компании при этом составляет $385 млн. Для Payward, материнской структуры Kraken, это диверсификация перед возможным IPO. Сделка при

👍12

24 Jun 2026, 12:01 UTC582 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📊 Для тех, кто хочет глубже — есть закрытый канал Selected. Крипто, DeFi, макро, ончейн-данные, разборы ликвидаций и трейд-идеи: конкретнее и детальнее того, что выходит в открытом доступе. Подписка — через @SELECTED_subscription_bot.

😱4👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @omdao_vc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,443,752 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OMDAO Ventures” (@omdao_vc), 3,262 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/omdao_vc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.