Я календарь переверну... и снова 4 дня до старта занятий в Олмат Получили школьное расписание? Самое время планировать кружки! 📥 7 сентября начинаются занятия на Базовом и Продвинутом курсах. А значит, уже сейчас формируются финальные списки групп. ❗️Если вы уже оплатили обучение, но не выбрали группу — напишите нам @olmath_support. Что важно знать: 🔴У нас живые занятия 🔴В группы попадают не больше учеников, чем …

Channel
Олимпиадная математика Олмат
@olmath
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,448subscribers
+354 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001384878409 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @olmath |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/olmath |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 15,448 | +61 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 15,387 | +123 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 15,264 | +4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 15,260 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 15,259 | +40 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 15,219 | +33 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:02 | 15,186 | +24 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:24 | 15,162 | +20 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:08 | 15,142 | +3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 15,139 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 15,147 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 15,156 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 15,159 | +19 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 15,140 | +7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 15,133 | +13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 15,120 | +23 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 15,097 | +7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 15,090 | +5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:19 | 15,085 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 15,088 | first reading |
Engagement
139 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.23%
- avg views ÷ 15,448 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 808
- 23 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.955%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 23
- of 139 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 139 (4 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 18,589 |
| Reactions total | 112 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 12m 10s
- Average length
- 2m 02s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
331 reactions across 83 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 229 | 69.2% | |
| 👍 | 38 | 11.5% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 9.37% | |
| ❤🔥 | 17 | 5.14% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 1.51% | |
| custom 5310090328307425295 | 3 | 0.906% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.604% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.604% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.302% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.302% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.302% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.302% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 139 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 331 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 139 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 139 we hold a reading for · 0.7%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @olmath. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 139 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Рассказываем про реалии поступления в 2026/27 году До поступления осталось 10 месяцев Конкурс высокий, мест мало, уже даже 300 баллов не гарантируют бюджет — поэтому искать дополнительные возможности нужно уже сейчас Чтобы вам не пришлось делать это в одиночку, 3 сентября мы проведем «помогательный» эфир для 11-классников и родителей 📌 Когда: 3 сентября, в 19:00 Мск 📌 Тема: «Реалии поступления 2026/27. Пошаговый …
❤1
В 7 классе он только пришёл на Продвинутый курс, в 11 уже был финалистом ВсОШ Арсений пришёл на Продвинутый курс Олмат в 7 классе, дальше были первые результаты, призовые места, всё более сложные задачи — и в 11 классе он стал финалистом ВсОШ. В карточках рассказываем его путь подробнее. Листайте 👉🏻 Большие олимпиадные результаты редко появляются за один сезон. Они складываются постепенно: когда ребёнок год за го…
Среднее арифметическое — это же просто сложить и поделить? На олимпиадах далеко не всегда. За привычным школьным словом «усреднение» скрываются задачи, в которых нужно заметить неочевидную идею, правильно построить рассуждение и не допустить ошибку в доказательстве. 🔴 И уже завтра мы разберём эту тему на открытом уроке для 8–9 классов. Но сразу предупреждаем: урок не для новичков, он рассчитан на ребят, которые уж…
🔥 Открыли новый канал — для родителей, которые только присматриваются к олимпиадной математике Ребёнок может быть сильным в школе — быстро схватывать, получать пятёрки — и теряться на первой же задаче, где нужно подумать, а не вспомнить правило. Обычно в этот момент родитель открывает десять вкладок про олимпиады и закрывает все, так и не поняв, с чего начать. Для этого момента мы сделали отдельный канал. Он будет …
❤6
От «любит решать задачки» до финала ВсОШ: как выглядит траектория олимпиадника с 1 по 11 класс Пока мы доукомплектовываем группы к старту учебного года 7 сентября, хотим показать вам, как выстраивается маршрут ребёнка, чтобы стало понятнее, где сейчас ваш ребёнок и что ему действительно нужно на этом этапе. 📌Сохраняйте — это почти карта на все школьные годы. 🔘1–2 класс. Главное сохранить интерес Головоломки, зако…
❤3
Родители, держимся 🤝 1 сентября — это когда в школу пошёл ребёнок, а марафон начался у всей семьи. Всем родителям сил, терпения и крепкой нервной системы. 😄 👇🏻 Опишите в комментариях ваше состояние одной картинкой/смайликом
❤13🔥7😁1
Проверим, кто разгадает всю тройку без единой подсказки! Какое слово спряталось здесь? Пишите ответ в комментариях — и признавайтесь, сколько из трёх удалось разгадать! Олимпиадная математика MAX | VK
Второй ребус уже ждёт — и, кажется, здесь придётся подумать чуть подольше. Что за слово зашифровали на этот раз? Ждём ваши версии в комментариях.⬇️ Олимпиадная математика MAX | VK
Разомнемся немного перед новым учебным годом? 😁 Мы подготовили для вас три ребуса. На каждой карточке зашифровано одно слово: внимательно смотрите на картинки, знаки и запятые — всё имеет значение! 👀 Начинаем с первого! Удалось разгадать? Пишите свой вариант в комментариях, только чур не подсматривать у других.⬇️ Олимпиадная математика MAX | VK
Video message, posted without a caption
❤8🔥3👍1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥10❤5👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 139 posts we hold for @olmath. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сколькими способами?
- 8114%
- 145515%
- 64919%
- 129653%
- 8754%
- Свой вариант (напишу в комментариях)6%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сколько всего составит вес рыбы?
- 458%
- 1661%
- 103%
- 803%
- 3621%
- Свой вариант (напишу в комментариях)5%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Когда вы видите ошибку ребёнка, что делаете чаще всего?
- Сразу говорю, где ошибка14%
- Даю время заметить самому23%
- Задаю вопрос или небольшую подсказку47%
- Зависит от ситуации16%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сколько ног всего нарисовала Луиза, если рук она нарисовала на 108 больше, чем глаз?
- 5636%
- 15621%
- 77811%
- 152%
- 21647%
- Свой вариант (напишу в комментариях)13%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сколько всего предметов могло быть в коробках?
- 112455%
- 115466%
- 1123674%
- 125698%
- 114566%
- Свой вариант (напишу в комментариях)2%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 139 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@matolimp · 31,697
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026
@pifshtany · 23,766
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 17 September 2026
@studyfaculty · 43,981
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Олимпиадная математика Олмат” (@olmath), 15,448 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olmath.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.