Раздел, который встречается снова и снова Если ребёнок уже решает олимпиадные задачи, он наверняка сталкивался с чем-то вроде: 🔴почему одно число делится на другое 🔴как устроены делители числа 🔴как разложение на простые помогает увидеть решение 🔴что можно понять про огромное число, даже не вычисляя его целиком Всё это — теория чисел. И это один из базовых разделов олимпиадной математики. Задачи на свойства чисел,…

Channel
Олимпиадная математика Олмат
@olmath
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
15,087subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001384878409 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @olmath |
| Description | Помогаем побеждать в олимпиадах! ✔️ 131 дипломов Матпраздника в 2025 году. ✔️ 31 – на финале ВСОШ и ол. Эйлера 💛 Кто мы t.me/olmath/2804 📗 О базовом курсе t.me/olmath/2887 📘 О продвинутом t.me/olmath/2861 🌐 Сайт olmath.ru ❓ Поддержка @olmath_support |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/olmath |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:09 | 15,087 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 15,085 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 15,082 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 15,085 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 15,089 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 15,088 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 15,095 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 15,094 | first reading |
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.55%
- avg views ÷ 15,087 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 686
- 39 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.458%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 39
- of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 39 (4 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 26,754 |
| Reactions total | 81 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,880
- Videos
- ≈223
- Links
- ≈2,270
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5m 47s
- Average length
- 2m 54s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
81 reactions across 24 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 50 | 61.7% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 13.6% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 12.3% | |
| custom 5310090328307425295 | 3 | 3.70% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 2.47% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 2.47% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.23% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 39 we hold a reading for · 3%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @olmath. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Как научиться видеть правило там, где сначала кажется просто набор чисел? Уже завтра, 14 августа в 17:00 по Москве, пройдёт открытый урок для учеников 3–4 классов. Тема — «Закономерности». Почему это классная тема для знакомства с олимпиадной математикой? Потому что закономерности окружают ребёнка постоянно: в последовательностях чисел, рисунках, повторяющихся действиях, даже в привычках и расписании. Но в олимпиа…
Video message, posted without a caption
❤7
🔴 ДИАГНОСТИКА НАЧАЛАСЬ! Самая выматывающая ситуация для родителей — это когда в занятиях олимпиадной математикой непонятно, правильно ли подобран уровень для ребёнка, из-за чего ребёнок теряет баллы на олимпиадах, и что делать дальше, чтобы были рост и развитие. В этот момент обычно начинается перебор вариантов: добавить занятия, сменить формат, взять репетитора, подождать ещё немного. Но проблема в отсутствии точн…
❤2
29 400 ₽ ПОДАРКОВ ЗА 0 ₽ К КУРСУ, КОТОРЫЙ РЕБЁНОК БУДЕТ ПРОХОДИТЬ ВЕСЬ ГОД 🎁 🎉 Мы запустили акцию «Старт года» и на этот раз решили сделать не один символический подарок, а собрать целый стартовый пакет для ребёнка и родителей. До 17 августа включительно при покупке пакета «Старт года» вы получаете обучение на год (Базовый или Продвинутый курс) + футболку Олмат или наушники + набор полезных курсов от нас и нашего …
❤3👍3🔥3👎1
Что на самом деле покажет диагностика, кроме количества баллов? 🔴 Уже 13 августа стартует вторая волна диагностики Олмат. И перед стартом мы попросили Дмитрия Валерьевича Чулкова, руководителя Продвинутого курса, подробно рассказать, что происходит с работой ребёнка после того, как он её отправляет. Потому что сама по себе цифра «решил 5 задач из 10» говорит родителю не так много. Важно понять: ✅ где ребёнок дейс…
❤1
Её боялись ВСЕ… Геометрию Это один из самых проблемных разделов математики для многих детей. В младших классах ребёнок привык работать с числами, текстами, задачами. Когда он приходит в 7-й класс, то видит абсолютно другое. Геометрия строится по новым для ребёнка законам. Часто сложно к ним привыкнуть. А в старших классах появляется ещё больше нюансов. ❗️Мы предлагаем заложить фундамент для участия в олимпиадах и …
😱2❤1
Какие олимпиады выбрать ученику 5–6 класса? 📌 В 5–6 классе уже можно постепенно собирать свой первый настоящий олимпиадный маршрут. Но новичку и ребёнку, который занимается уже не первый год, нужны разные старты. Поэтому разделили подборку на два уровня. 🌟Если ребёнок только начинает Главная задача — не диплом любой ценой, а хороший первый опыт, чтобы понять формат, привыкнуть к нестандартным задачам и не испугат…
❤3
Родители и ребята, кто уже задумывается о поступлении? Мы подготовили целых два бесплатных инструмента, которые упростят вам жизнь ❤️ 📥 Первый — путеводитель по перечневым олимпиадам Там расписаны все перечневые олимпиады по математике: уровень в перечне, примерные даты и тип олимпиады (спортивная/техническая) + ссылки на сайты соревнований 📥 Второй — сайт с льготами 132 вузов России от Москвы до Урала Вводите н…
❤5
Школьная математика и олимпиадная — один предмет, но совсем разные миры Почему задачи в олимпиадном формате так отличаются от привычных из учебника? А главное, как это помогает развивать у ребёнка мышление, логику и креативность? Разбираем разницу на карточках. 👉🏻 Хочется, чтобы ребёнок начал думать глубже, увереннее и креативнее? Запишите его на Базовый или Продвинутый курс — пока ещё есть свободные места в удобн…
Ребёнок уже готов к следующему уровню или пока рано? Если он уже год-два занимается олимпиадной математикой, уверенно решает привычные типы задач и школьного уровня ему давно мало, в какой-то момент появляется новый вопрос: а пора ли переходить к более серьёзной подготовке? Не просто решать для интереса, а выходить на более сложные задачи, отборы, сильные олимпиады и системную работу на результат. Но здесь важно н…
Если бы олимпиадная математика была игрой — это был бы Portal Да, там тоже есть головоломки, но похожи они именно потому, что правила вроде бы простые, а выигрывает тот, кто начинает видеть ситуацию не так, как все. В Portal не получится просто идти вперёд, там нужно: 🔴 посмотреть на комнату под другим углом 🔴 использовать знакомый инструмент неожиданным способом 🔴 вернуться на шаг назад 🔴 заметить связь между тем,…
❤2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @olmath. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сколько всего предметов могло быть в коробках?
- 112455%
- 115466%
- 1123674%
- 125698%
- 114566%
- Свой вариант (напишу в комментариях)2%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 109,320 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Олимпиадная математика Олмат” (@olmath), 15,087 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olmath.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.