Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Серёжина Оля.

Channel

Серёжина Оля.

@olgaserezhina1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,862subscribers

-71 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001773872972
TypeChannel
Username@olgaserezhina1
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/olgaserezhina1

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,86213,93313,897.57 August 2026 — 13,933 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,928 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,921 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,915 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,911 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,908 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,902 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,896 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,893 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,889 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,887 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,885 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,884 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,893 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,891 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,888 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,891 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,889 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,890 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,888 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,882 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,881 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,880 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,874 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,875 subscribers9 September 2026 — 13,880 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,878 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,874 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,870 subscribers19 September 2026 — 13,862 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 43 days, net -71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,851–13,944 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 14:3913,862-8
15 Sept 2026, 04:5813,870-4
13 Sept 2026, 15:1913,874-4
11 Sept 2026, 19:0113,878-2
9 Sept 2026, 05:3513,880+5
5 Sept 2026, 18:2213,875+1
3 Sept 2026, 15:3913,874-6
2 Sept 2026, 11:4413,880-1
1 Sept 2026, 11:2813,881-1
31 Aug 2026, 09:3613,882-6
30 Aug 2026, 08:4713,888-2
29 Aug 2026, 09:3413,890+1
28 Aug 2026, 07:2813,889-2
27 Aug 2026, 06:0413,891+3
26 Aug 2026, 06:3313,888-3
25 Aug 2026, 08:2213,891-2
24 Aug 2026, 11:1813,893+9
22 Aug 2026, 22:2713,884-1
21 Aug 2026, 10:1813,885-2
19 Aug 2026, 15:2313,887first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 13,862 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,740
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held43 (1 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total17,358
Reactions total1,070
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16m 28s
Average length
2m 04s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,744 reactions across 39 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,30034.7%
1,12530.0%
🔥92824.8%
👏1062.83%
😁1032.75%
🤝752.00%
🥰381.01%
👀250.668%
💯160.427%
150.401%
👌50.134%
🤩40.107%
😱20.053%
🙈10.027%
🙏10.027%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,744 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 09:36 UTC881 views75 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

В продолжение моего утреннего поста хочу рассказать о пряже. Столкнулась тут я с одной проблемой, и, к счастью, удалось её решить! Делюсь опытом, вдруг пригодится. Вяжу джемпер в три нити. Основная — от Biagioli Modesto, 100% кашемир, артикул Aran, 300 метров на 100 грамм. К ней я добавила две тонкие нити по 1300 метров: 80% шерсти и 20% полиамида. Проблема возникла с основной нитью. Когда начала вязать образец,

👍46🔥1297🥰1

2 Sept 2026, 06:37 UTC997 views95 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Всем привет 👋 Вчера связала образец, решив, что раз у меня есть джемпер с жгутами, то и мужу такой же надо! Тем более, пряжа давно ждет своего часа. Вечером связала образец, а с утра набрала петли и приступила к вязанию! Путь предстоит долгий, но я уже наметила себе три финиша на выбор, так сказать 😁 1. Первый — это будет классный подарок на Новый год. 2. Второй— (запасной) – 23 февраля. 3. И, если уж совсем

👍55😁1715🔥7🤝1

1 Sept 2026, 13:10 UTC≈1,290 views70 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Posted without readable text

39🔥21👍10

1 Sept 2026, 06:11 UTC≈1,570 views56 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Видеодневник: Пошаговое вязание джемпера с жгутами. Это новый формат мастер-классов! Главная фишка этого формата — фокус на сложных технических узлах и моментах, которые чаще всего вызывают затруднения в процессе вязания. Давайте подробно расскажу, что именно будет содержать этот видеодневник на примере этого джемпера. ✅Обзор изделия. Замеры, пряжа, рекомендации по подбору пряжи. Разбор схемы узора и количества

44🔥12

31 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC≈1,740 views154 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Всем привет! Сегодня последний день августа, и мне очень хочется запомнить его чем-то особенным. Поэтому показываю вам свой джемпер "Август". Технические параметры: • Пряжа: Артикул "Клан" от Loro Piana (85% кашемир, 15% мохер), 350 метров на 100 грамм. • Спицы: №4. • Плотность вязания: 3 петли на 3 ряда. • Расход: 1540 метров (440 грамм). • Размеры: Длина 62 см, ширина 59 см. Джемпер связан снизу вверх отде

👍9332👏17🔥9🥰3

30 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC≈1,850 views175 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Всем привет! 👋 У меня сегодня незапланированное включение, потому что не могу не показать! Посмотрите, какую красоту связала Лариса!👍 Этот жилет по курсу «Соло», на мой взгляд, идеален во всех отношениях: и по фактуре, и в целом всё просто замечательно!! Спасибо огромное, Лариса! Высший класс! 😍 Давайте засыпем Ларису комплиментами и реакциями! ♥️👍🔥 ✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️ Подробности о курсе https://t.me

🔥111👍3925

28 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC≈2,400 views80 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Давно не было #миксы #коктейли

45🔥18👍17

28 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC≈2,300 views57 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Доброе утро! ☕️ Я сегодня отправляюсь охотиться за пряжей! 🧶 Не рекомендую дальше читать, если вы в "пряжной завязке" ))☺️ Рассказываю... Во вторник захожу на канал к Наташе Фадеенко, а у неё там анонс новой партии пряжи.. И всё ... я потеряла покой... Впервые красил пряжу её сын Кирилл, и я прям очень хочу заполучить одну расцветку, потому что она меня покорила. Все мои любимые оттенки собрались в одной пас

37👍20

27 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC≈2,090 views213 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! Сегодня у нас от-личный четверг, отличный от вязания! 😉 По вашим просьбам я решила рассказать о том, как мне удалось сбросить 12 килограммов и каким образом я удерживаю этот вес уже почти год. Что я для этого делаю? Хотелось бы для начала отметить, что все мы разные, и это просто моя история, мой индивидуальный путь. Это не призыв к действию, а скорее повод поделиться опытом. Первое, с чего я начала

👍132🔥4121👏13💯4🥰2

25 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈2,240 views95 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Покажу кусочек красоты, которую сложно выпускать из рук. Вяжу шаль/бактус/шарф... пока не определилась. Пряжа Гомитоло Альпака Лана Гросса 350м /100г 42% бэби альпака, 30% полиакрил, 18% полиамид, 10% шерсть virgin 🎨 Цвет 369 В компаньоны выбрала 100% гребенной меринос. Спицы 3,5. Вяжется молниеносно...

🔥6425👍6

25 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC≈2,110 views151 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Доброе утро 🧘 А у меня примерка другого образа. Классическое сочетание цветов, по моему мнению, всегда смотрится выигрышно 😊 🩶❤️🤍

🔥9726👍12💯12🥰4

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @olgaserezhina1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Вяжем с Викой🧶
@vikiknit · 23,892
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 17 September 2026
НашПотребНадзор Олега Солнцева
@potreb_solntseva · 57,105
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Серёжина Оля.” (@olgaserezhina1), 13,862 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olgaserezhina1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.