Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ольга Игоревна | ХГ правила

Channel

Ольга Игоревна | ХГ правила

@olgaigorevnamo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,160subscribers

+38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001194076253
TypeChannel
Username@olgaigorevnamo
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/olgaigorevnamo

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,1206,1806,1507 August 2026 — 6,122 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,122 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,121 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,120 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,137 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,177 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,178 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,180 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,177 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,166 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,157 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,153 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,158 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,160 subscribers6,1607 August 202615 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 39 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,111–6,189 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 13:006,160+2
12 Sept 2026, 03:016,158+5
8 Sept 2026, 05:556,153-4
2 Sept 2026, 20:486,157-9
30 Aug 2026, 21:276,166-11
27 Aug 2026, 15:356,177-3
24 Aug 2026, 12:486,180+2
21 Aug 2026, 06:046,178+1
18 Aug 2026, 04:326,177+40
14 Aug 2026, 20:076,137+17
11 Aug 2026, 01:236,120-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:476,121-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:166,122no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:106,122first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 00s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

694 reactions across 16 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18326.4%
🔥17425.1%
❤‍🔥16924.4%
🥰405.76%
😍395.62%
😢314.47%
🤩182.59%
🤝91.30%
👍81.15%
🌭50.72%
👏50.72%
40.576%
😱40.576%
💘20.288%
🗿10.144%
🤗10.144%
🤨10.144%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 694 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC≈1,080 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Заметки по кадрам с опробования 📝 Тася — поработала хорошо над экспрессией лица, и добавила деталек (характера). Надеюсь на выступлениях будет также ярко 🔥 Даша — вроде кардинальных изменений нет в программах, что соответствует их с тренером наработанной стратегии. Те прыжки, что не в полную силу, она делает так, что работа предмета нарабатывается. Джеованна 🇧🇷— думала, что всё-таки ей дадут 3 вида. С ее набором ч

❤‍🔥137🥰6👍21🌭1💘1🤝1

6 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC≈1,850 views81 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Работа с маленькими детьми — это всегда креатив, ассоциации, воображение ✨ Самые простые банальные вещи приходится объяснять 100 разными способами. Зато скучно не бывает 🐒

🔥3923🥰12😍3🌭1👍1🗿1🤗1

3 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC≈3,210 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Сколько стоит риск

  1. 0,720%
  2. 0,850%
  3. 0,615%
  4. 1,015%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤‍🔥3015🔥10

3 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈2,790 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

#Rиски ШПАРГАЛКА по рискам📄 Практикуемся ⬇️

❤‍🔥167😍3

3 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC≈2,930 views83 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

#Rиски 💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Здравствуйте! Сколько будут стоить все эти риски? Хороший пример того, как риски в упражнении могут постепенно усложняться 🔥 1️⃣Бросок без рук, без зрения 0,2 4 вращения 0,4 Смена уровня 0,1 Ловля в проход 0,1 = 0,8 2️⃣Бросок без рук, без зрения 0,2 5 вращений 0,5 Серия 0,2 Смена уровня 0,1 Ловля без рук, без зрения 0,2 = 1,2

❤‍🔥37🔥2411😍8👍3

1 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC≈2,320 views130 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

#Rиски 😱 Каскад, без рук, без зрения 0,3 4 кувырка 0,4 Серия 0,2 Ловля без рук, без зрения 0,2 = 1,1

🔥8223🤩16❤‍🔥3😱3👏2🌭1

31 Jul 2026, 04:02 UTC≈3,270 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Для участников Интенсива ФОКУС у нас отличные новости🔥 Тренировки пройдут на ГЛАВНОЙ АРЕНЕ Дворца Ирины Винер. Профессиональные помосты и «бесконечные» потолки 😍 Отличная возможность отработать риски, высокие броски и не только перед стартом сезона. Напомню, что интенсив направлен на отработку личных программ. Исправляем неточности в программах, чтобы получать высокие оценки уже на старте сезона. В конце интенси

❤‍🔥15🥰8🔥53😍3💘1😱1

28 Jul 2026, 06:29 UTC≈2,660 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Здравствуйте, сколько снимут за такую ошибку ? Судьи исполнения (Е) снимают: - 0,1 за 2 шага до ловли высокой булавы. - 0,7 за потерю и возврат после 2х шагов Судьи DB: Регистрируют, что была попытка риска, но сам он не считается. (Риск был запланирован примерно на 0,9.) Бригада артистики (А) снимают: -0,2 за нарушение ритма - Ещё могла вылететь часть характера и оценка артистики ещё получится Обратите внимание,

😢3116🥰6🤝4❤‍🔥2

25 Jul 2026, 20:47 UTC≈3,350 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#DB У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Здравствуйте, а вы можете подсказать, не утвердили ли новый поворот Варфоломеевой? Новые вращения Туголуковой, Грискенас, Драгаш и Варфоломеев официально утверждены и могут использоваться всеми гимнастками. Они будут вписаны в правила после чемпионата мира.

17❤‍🔥7🥰4👏3😍3🌭1🤝1

24 Jul 2026, 18:33 UTC≈2,710 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

☎️+7(925)531-22-25 запись по телефону Центр Винер Лужники

16❤‍🔥7😍4👍21

24 Jul 2026, 16:24 UTC≈2,780 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ШПАРГАЛКА «Как считать стоимость поворотов»🌪️ Легко, ясно и понятно 🫡

❤‍🔥11🔥32😍2🌭1

24 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC≈2,780 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Засчитаем ли риск?

  1. Да, все что начато в пределах площадки засчитывается49%
  2. Нет, так как выход за ковер12%
  3. Нет, поймала без музыки39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤‍🔥13🔥6😍31

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @olgaigorevnamo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz887 voters

Сколько стоит риск

  1. 0,720%
  2. 0,850%
  3. 0,615%
  4. 1,015%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTCAnonymous Quiz809 voters

Засчитаем ли риск?

  1. Да, все что начато в пределах площадки засчитывается49%
  2. Нет, так как выход за ковер12%
  3. Нет, поймала без музыки39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Художественная гимнастика / Небесная грация / Sky Grace
@skygraceacademy · 33,041
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 September 2026
Arina and Dina Averins❤️💙
@arishadina98 · 27,403
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ольга Игоревна | ХГ правила” (@olgaigorevnamo), 6,160 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olgaigorevnamo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.