5 measurements spanning 21 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 847–854 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 04:56
848
-2
21 Aug 2026, 13:14
850
-3
14 Aug 2026, 20:25
853
+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:03
852
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:27
852
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 19 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
46 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
21
45.7%
❤
16
34.8%
👍
7
15.2%
👏
1
2.17%
💯
1
2.17%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2025 to 24 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Где вы сейчас чаще всего покупаете дорогие (или просто подороже) вещи?
В офлайн-магазинах (ТЦ, монобрендовые магазины)30%
В онлайн-магазинах брендов с курьерской доставкой23%
На маркетплейсах с примеркой в ПВЗ11%
Заказываю за границей через байеров или офиц платформы26%
Притормозил(а) с покупками /не актуально /не покупаю дорогое40%
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Слушала тут любопытный подкаст про продажи одежды на маркетплейсах, в том числе про специальные разделы для премиум-брендов.
Директор Ozon Fashion рассказала о взрывном спросе на дорогую одежду и аксессуары на озоне в последние годы, и в первую очередь объяснила это тем, что ПВЗ предоставляют такой же уровень сервиса, как офлайн-магазины.
На этой фразе я подавилась. Вроде живу в Москве, работаю в центре, повидала м…
Немного вдохновения ходить в красивые места и наслаждаться всем, на что падает взгляд и чего касается рука 🏰
Ресторан Фрегат Благодать в Санкт-Петербурге
Как на английском "аналог", то есть бюджетная альтернатива дорогому продукту, близкая ему по свойствам или даже идентичная? Дополняем #бьюти_словарь.
В 9 случаях из 10 блогер скажет dupe. Вообще это переводится как "развод, обманка", но плохой смысл куда-то постепенно ушёл, а остался самый позитивный. Так что ищите в названиях видео luxury dupes (аналоги люкса), Balmain dupes (аналоги Balmain).
Есть ещё один вариан…
Богачи перестали покупать люкс, люкс умер
Пожалуй, статья на WWD посеяла настоящую панику, которая назревала уже давно. Даже ультрабогатые клиенты (те самые VIC - very important customers), которые делают выручку люковым домам, начали покупать меньше. Пошли слухи о финансовых трудностях брендов даже из первой десятки, а последний гвоздь в крышку гроба люкса забил Kering, заменивший легендарного Франсуа-Анри Пино во …
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @olga_famous. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Где вы сейчас чаще всего покупаете дорогие (или просто подороже) вещи?
В офлайн-магазинах (ТЦ, монобрендовые магазины)30%
В онлайн-магазинах брендов с курьерской доставкой23%
На маркетплейсах с примеркой в ПВЗ11%
Заказываю за границей через байеров или офиц платформы26%
Притормозил(а) с покупками /не актуально /не покупаю дорогое40%
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2025 to 24 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Do you speak Luxe?” (@olga_famous), 848 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olga_famous.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
