Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Олег Пахолков

Channel

Олег Пахолков

@olegpaholkov

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

15,269subscribers

-134 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001728099239
TypeChannel
Username@olegpaholkov
Created25 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/olegpaholkov

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

17,300 average views per post against 15,269 subscribers — an engagement rate of 113.4%. Across the 16,995 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,614 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.71% and 17.9%, with a median of 9.14%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (25 August 2026 24 September 2026)
Posts measured18 of 18 published in the window (2 exact, 16 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled311,706
Mature posts only127.3% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers15,269 measured 18 September 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 16,995 channels · p10 2.43% · p25 4.71% · p50 9.14% · p75 17.9% · p90 30.6%
Position in cohort99.841th percentile · 12.4× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.19% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 24 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

15,26915,40815,338.56 August 2026 — 15,403 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,403 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,408 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,406 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,399 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,391 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,379 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,378 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,366 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,352 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,343 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,341 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,335 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,330 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,325 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,324 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,320 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,322 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,320 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,318 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,313 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,306 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,307 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,321 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,322 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,323 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,319 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,310 subscribers10 September 2026 — 15,303 subscribers12 September 2026 — 15,305 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,298 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,285 subscribers18 September 2026 — 15,269 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -134. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,248–15,429 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:4115,269-16
16 Sept 2026, 08:4115,285-13
14 Sept 2026, 12:5515,298-7
12 Sept 2026, 21:5715,305+2
10 Sept 2026, 22:3915,303-7
8 Sept 2026, 00:4215,310-9
4 Sept 2026, 21:4115,319-4
3 Sept 2026, 07:0815,323+1
2 Sept 2026, 02:1715,322+1
1 Sept 2026, 05:3915,321+14
31 Aug 2026, 05:5215,307+1
30 Aug 2026, 04:3515,306-7
29 Aug 2026, 01:3415,313-5
28 Aug 2026, 04:5315,318-2
26 Aug 2026, 02:3515,320-2
25 Aug 2026, 04:1615,322+2
24 Aug 2026, 03:2415,320-4
22 Aug 2026, 14:2615,324-1
21 Aug 2026, 06:1215,325-5
20 Aug 2026, 06:2215,330first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
113.4%
avg views ÷ 15,269 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,300
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.244%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held52 (28 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total311,706
Reactions total760
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 43m
Average length
5m 27s

Measured directly from 30 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,463 reactions across 50 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍65326.5%
💊33613.6%
💯26310.7%
🔥2148.69%
👎2098.49%
1937.84%
🙏1646.66%
🥴642.60%
🤣602.44%
🍌421.71%
🤬311.26%
🏆261.06%
🙉261.06%
🤪240.974%
🤝230.934%
🕊200.812%
🥱180.731%
👏170.69%
🫡130.528%
😁110.447%
18 further kinds562.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,463 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 09:14 UTC338 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Выборы сегодня - это не смена курса, а определение позиций общества по нынешней ситуации. Если ты поддерживаешь то, о чем радикально говорит партия «Родина», расхреначить всех жестко и закончить эту войну, то ты придешь и проголосуешь за нас. Если нет, то остальные партии так и будут вяло сопли жевать ещё много лет, а мы будем терять наших братьев и возможно потеряем страну.

👍5💊3👎1👏1💯1🤣1

2 Sept 2026, 09:00 UTC≈61,100 views79 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Да когда же вы нажретесь? О законе, что все курицы должны получить паспорта и гражданство. Когда государственная дума прекратит штамповать законы, из которых торчат уши олигархов , которые хотят набить карманы? Подобными методами фактически уничтожили коров, свиней, даже рыбу и добрались до птиц. У меня у самого 20 курей три декоративных козла, один осел, десяток гусей и и два десятка кроликов. Мне всех вести за

👍41💯28🏆32💊2🤣2🤷‍♂1

2 Sept 2026, 08:14 UTC≈1,260 views29 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Мои мысли на дебатах у Соловьева Часть третья

👍14💊5🔥4🤣41🙈1

2 Sept 2026, 08:05 UTC≈1,180 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Мои мысли на дебатах у Соловьева. Часть вторая

👍9💊5🔥4🤣4🙈21

1 Sept 2026, 16:36 UTC≈2,240 views75 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Мои мысли на дебатах у Соловьева Я не знаю, пройдём мы или нет, для этого нужно набрать 5% избирателей. Если пройдем, буду говорить и буду делать. Если нет , продолжу радостно заниматься тем, чем занимался.

👍41🔥98💊6🍌4🤝4🏆1👎1

1 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTC≈1,430 views51 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Сегодня были дебаты у Соловьева. После дебатов решили все вместе сфоткаться. На фотографии уникально получилось то, как было на самом деле. Бондаренко (КПРФ) - редкая гнида и мистификатор. Хуруджи (Новые люди) - миру мир, войны не нужно вот девиз отряда Дружба! Толстой (ЕР) - оправдывал ЕР, как мог. Ну и я- скромно р@зъебенеть н@х*й всех.

🏆18💊12👍9👎6🤣2😁2🎉1🤝1

31 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC≈51,500 views85 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Жилищный патриотизм: почему России срочно требуется массовая малоэтажная застройка Парадокс: в самой большой стране мира с минимальной плотностью населения людей загоняют в 30-этажные «человейники». Застройщики получают сверхприбыли, а люди — 30 лет ипотечной кабалы, пробки, нехватку парковок и вечный стресс. Высотки — это еще и колоссальный риск безопасности. В эпоху беспилотников такие гиганты становятся уязвимой

🔥41👍24💯65🤬4💊3🤣1🙏1

31 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC≈2,730 views43 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Сегодня — день памяти первого Главы Донецкой Народной Республики, нашего «Бати» — Александра Владимировича Захарченко. Восемь лет назад его жизнь подло оборвали в центре Донецка. Спи спокойно, герой русского мира! Россия выстоит и победит!

🔥15🙏146💊5🍌1🍾1🤣1

31 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC≈1,320 views42 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @diviziya15Photo

Сегодня, 31 августа — день памяти первого Главы Донецкой Народной Республики, нашего «Бати» — Александра Владимировича Захарченко. Восемь лет назад его жизнь подло оборвали в центре Донецка. Взорвали кафе «Сепар». Убили не в бою — исподтишка. Ему было 42 года. Для «Пятнашки» это особая потеря. Именно Александр Захарченко включил наше подразделение в состав Республиканской Гвардии ДНР. Он стоял у истоков. Его вера в

🙏34💊4🥴2🍌1🤣1

30 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC≈1,470 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @bloknot_rossiyaPoll

Нужно ли ударить по крупным военным объектам на Украине ядерным оружием?

  1. Да50%
  2. Нет50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💊20🔥2😱1

30 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC≈1,390 views49 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @bloknot_rossiyaVideo

Мы обязаны применить тактическое ядерное оружие и не надо из этого разводить дискуссию. Мы должны принудить врага к капитуляции - депутат Госдумы, лидер партии «Родина» Алексей Журавлев.

💊25👍10👎8😱2🙈2🔥1🤷1

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @olegpaholkov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTCAnonymous Poll2,080 voters approx.

Нужно ли ударить по крупным военным объектам на Украине ядерным оружием?

  1. Да50%
  2. Нет50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTCAnonymous Poll3,420 voters approx.

Украинских женщин надо беречь ?

  1. Да67%
  2. Нет35%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTCAnonymous Poll3,220 voters approx.

Нужно ли проверить публично , всех кандидатов. На признание Крыма ?

  1. Да нужно, не признание Крыма это гос измена64%
  2. Признание Крыма это личное дело каждого37%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTCAnonymous Poll1,380 voters approx.

Пока идет суд между Яблоком и Родиной обе партии за мир но есть нюанс. Родина ,мир через силу! Яблоко за перемирие на любых условиях (проект Украины)

  1. Родина мир через силу78%
  2. Яблоко мир на любых условиях.23%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTCAnonymous Poll357 voters

Иван Миронов отрабатывает денги Ходорковского ?

  1. Да81%
  2. Нет20%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTCAnonymous Poll297 voters

Если бы выбор был только из двух партий, вы за кого?

  1. Партия Родина42%
  2. Партия ЛДПР59%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Блокнот Россия 18+
@bloknot_rossiya · 244,168
8 posts
Блокнот Ставрополь
@bloknot_stavropol · 59,347
8 posts
Блокнот Новороссийск
@bloknot_nvrssk · 31,214
7 posts
Блокнот Ростов
@bloknot_rostov · 40,051
7 posts
Блокнот Старс
@bloknot_star · 126,217
7 posts
Блокнот Волжский
@bloknot_volzhsky · 21,185
7 posts
Блокнот Краснодар
@bloknotkrasnodar · 27,074
7 posts
Блокнот Морозовск
@bloknot_morozovsk · 15,687
6 posts
Блокнот Таганрог
@bloknot_taganrog · 30,534
6 posts
Блокнот Волгодонск
@bloknot_vdonsk1 · 64,983
6 posts
Блокнот Воронеж
@bloknot_vrn · 63,384
6 posts
Блокнот Анапа
@anapa_bloknot · 14,713
5 posts
Блокнот Волгоград
@bIoknot_vlg · 87,893
5 posts
Блокнот Запорожье
@bloknot_zo · 17,669
5 posts
Блокнот Донецк | Новости ДНР | СВО
@bloknot_dnr · 12,874
4 posts
Блокнот Херсон
@bloknot_kherson · 9,368
4 posts
Басурин о главном
@basurin_e · 91,883
1 post
Блокнот Новочеркасск
@bloknot_novocherkassk · 60
1 post
Добрая миссия
@dobromissia · 1
1 post
⚖️ЕЛЕНА КОНЬШИНА⚖️ ВОЕННОЕ ПРАВО⚖️
@konshina_urist_blog · 3,700
1 post
its Me💜
@marinamayer177 · 2,148
1 post
НАШИ ЛЮДИ
@naschi_lyudi · 5
1 post
Блокнот Сочи
@sochi_bloknot · 3,867
1 post
Владислав Граф-Колесник
@vlad_grafkolesnik · 795
1 post
ДОНЕЦК Z | МАКЕЕВКА | РОСТОВ | НОВОСТИ | ВОЕННЫЕ СВОДКИ
@vmakeevke · 153,296
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Олег Пахолков” (@olegpaholkov), 15,269 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olegpaholkov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.