3 measurements spanning 5 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,660–5,663 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 03:05
5,660
-1
20 Aug 2026, 02:38
5,661
-2
19 Aug 2026, 04:46
5,663
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 5 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9m 01s
Average length
1m 48s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,904 reactions across 18 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,638
56.4%
🔥
848
29.2%
❤
216
7.44%
🤔
72
2.48%
👏
29
0.999%
🎉
23
0.792%
😁
15
0.517%
🤝
11
0.379%
🕊
10
0.344%
😐
10
0.344%
🤣
7
0.241%
👎
6
0.207%
😢
6
0.207%
😨
4
0.138%
👀
2
0.069%
💯
2
0.069%
😱
2
0.069%
🥴
2
0.069%
🐳
1
0.034%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,904reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 December 2025 to 6 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
267
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 18 we hold a reading for · 78%
Most on one post
185
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @olegopevtsov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 December 2025 to 6 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Друзья, свершилось! Я наконец-то перебрался в свою новую студию. Начинается масштабный, сложный и полностью самостоятельный проект Берлога.
Пока здесь чистый бетон, спартанские условия и полное отсутствие ремонта. Многие бы в таких условиях не продержались и дня, но для инженера это прежде всего чистый холст и крутой вызов.
Первая серия из этого бетонного логова уже на канале. Показываю всё как есть, делюсь первыми…
🚀 НОВОЕ ВИДЕО НА КАНАЛЕ!
Друзья, я бросил себе серьезный вызов. Другу Женьке Кайоту понадобилась сложная деталь — крыльчатка, и чтобы сделать её идеально, мне пришлось с нуля осваивать топовую CAM программу PowerMill.
В этом видео:
🔹 Нюансы программирования двусторонней обработки.
🔹 Самый валидольный момент — идеальный переворот на 180° и точнейшее совмещение баз.
🔹 Стружка рекой, чистый металл и готовый результат.…
Друзья, работа в разгаре, но случился технический форс-мажор там, где не ждал. Моя камера решила проверить законы гравитации. Итог печальный, у основного объектива буквально с мясом вырвало байонет. Ремонт приблизительно стоит 22000.
Вы знаете, как я забочусь о качестве картинки. Сейчас снимать детальные технические ролики стало гораздо сложнее и качество видео заметно упало.
Ремонт оптики — дело недешёвое и внепл…
Много комментов с вопросом о кепке, сколько было дублей. В этот раз очень много, левая рука не такая точная) Решил выложить неудачные дубли в ускорении. И удачный дубль в самом конце 🤪
Как и обещел, выкладываю файл мостика, в формате ipt. чтобы при желании, у вас была возможность изменить и отредактировать. Если я сделаю доработки, покажу в следующем видео.
Друзья, лёд тронулся! Первая серия по восстановлению легенды, ИЖ 250 загружена на все площадки, загружал всю ночь, утром задрых немного))) Приглашаю всех к просмотру YouTube: https://youtu.be/4ktUHc9pzQY?si=AQBOMh7wwpdwmn8d VK: https://vkvideo.ru/video-211185286_456239056 RuTube: https://rutube.ru/video/e1ebaf7f42238205debb1ba1d920472f/?r=wd Дзен: https://dzen.ru/video/watch/69d5c5b916c912336e8d01e2?share_to=link Вс…
Друзья, у меня к вам просьба. Прошу посмотреть отображается ли у вас сегодняшнее видео в подписках на ютубе. Мне уже несколько человек написали, что узнали о видео только из рекомендаций. Какая-то дичь творится. За первый час видео набрало всего лишь 300 просмотров.((( Прошу проверить и отписаться здесь.
Друзья, всем привет. Выпустил коротенькое видео на YouTube: https://youtu.be/YiF6SmaUiVA?si=m9ME4FtZZT-g9LWJ . Повышаю постепенно свои навыки на ЧПУ. На наши площадки не грузится, кроме Rutube: https://rutube.ru/video/931482552cd80212e731304a1020d73a/?r=wd Похоже на то, что перестарались с блокировками 🙃 Всем приятного просмотра и хорошего дня 🙂😉
🔥103👍41❤15🥴2🤔1
Signed Олег Певцов
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @olegopevtsov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
AlexGyver 🛠 Channel @alexgyvershow · 77,995 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
NatashkaPLUS @NatashkaPLUS · 56,972 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 23 August 2026
Лихой ТопорЪ @lihojtoporofficial · 52,522 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
МАШИНАТОРЫ @mashinatory · 67,593 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
CombatCrew 🚜 @combatcrew · 68,244 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Олег Певцов” (@olegopevtsov), 5,660 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olegopevtsov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.