Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Paddock Live

Channel

Paddock Live

@olegkarpovonf1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,854subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001380058462
TypeChannel
Username@olegkarpovonf1
Created1 December 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/olegkarpovonf1

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,8542,8652,859.56 August 2026 — 2,865 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,865 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,864 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,862 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,861 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,863 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,862 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,855 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,856 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,854 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 42 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,852–2,867 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 20:182,854-2
12 Sept 2026, 16:202,856+1
9 Sept 2026, 01:572,855-7
31 Aug 2026, 17:542,862-1
22 Aug 2026, 18:272,863+2
19 Aug 2026, 13:152,861-1
16 Aug 2026, 19:072,862-2
12 Aug 2026, 21:182,864-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:462,865no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:382,865first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 August 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

323 reactions across 7 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12037.2%
👍10833.4%
👀3611.1%
🔥185.57%
😱82.48%
🗿61.86%
😢61.86%
🤮61.86%
🤡51.55%
🖕30.929%
💩20.619%
🤩20.619%
🎃10.31%
🐳10.31%
🤔10.31%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 323 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2021 to 13 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Nov 2025, 19:01 UTC≈3,230 views135 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Тук-тук – я на секунду. Просто посмотрите на Настю. Она волшебная. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUIyq343LsU Подпишитесь: @mswand

57👀36🔥18👍8🗿6🤮6💩2🎃1

6 Sept 2023, 13:47 UTC≈9,110 views91 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mastakinkPhoto

ИСТОРИЯ ЖУРНАЛА «ФОРМУЛА», РАССКАЗАННАЯ ЕГО СОЗДАТЕЛЯМИ Большинство русскоязычных болельщиков, начинавших смотреть Формулу 1 в конце 90-х и начале 00-х, выросли на журнале «Формула». Появившись в 1998-м, «Формула» сразу стала культовым изданием, но его внезапное исчезновение в 2004-м оставило читателей в недоумении. Последние 20 лет журнал жил лишь в памяти болельщиков, и чтобы эта память не стерлась окончательно,

47👍25😱8🤡5🖕3🤩2🤔1

23 Feb 2022, 08:04 UTC≈18,000 views89 reactionsread 7 August 2026

С НОВЫМ ГОДОМ Всем привет из Барселоны – с первых тестов новой Формулы 1! У меня много по поводу нового сезона восторгов. Мне очень нравятся новые машины. Они производят какое-то целостное впечатление. Они выглядят так, будто их создавали для того, чтобы хорошо выглядеть – хотя, по сути, наверное, так и было. Мне нравились и прежние, но сейчас, смотря на их фотографии, легче замечаешь их изъяны. Эти странные крепле

👍7112😢6

16 Dec 2021, 16:45 UTC≈17,400 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ЗАЯВЛЕНИЕ MERCEDES Тото Вольф и его команда признали поражение в борьбе за титул. Кому-то может показаться, что это решение запоздалое. Кому-то – что оно неизбежное. Но есть один момент: реши Mercedes подать апелляцию и довести дело до суда, шансы на победу были бы очень велики. Легко играть в джентльменов, сидя перед экраном телевизора, компьютера, ноутбука или смартфона. Но им это решение точно далось нелегко. В

3👍1

12 Dec 2021, 14:56 UTC≈10,300 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ВЫВОДЫ Не обязательно читать. Можно просто сразу в комментарии. https://ru.motorsport.com/f1/news/gran-pri-abu-dabi-pyat-bystrykh-vyvodov-6877706/6877706/

1

9 Dec 2021, 10:21 UTC≈10,900 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Очень интересно, что вы думаете. Кто выиграет титул?

  1. Ферстаппен40%
  2. Хэмилтон60%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Dec 2021, 20:12 UTC≈11,600 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ВЫВОДЫ Имейте ввиду, меня сильно трясло. https://ru.motorsport.com/f1/news/gran-pri-saudovskoj-aravii-pyat-bystrykh-vyvodov/6854033/

👍1

21 Nov 2021, 15:53 UTC≈10,400 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

КАТАР. ВЫВОДЫ. Комментируйте! https://ru.motorsport.com/f1/news/gran-pri-katara-pyat-bystrykh-vyvodov/6805964/

👍2

14 Nov 2021, 18:50 UTC≈8,710 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ВЫВОДЫ По многочисленным запросам. https://ru.motorsport.com/f1/news/gran-pri-brazilii-pyat-bystrykh-vyvodov-6781687/6781687/

10 Oct 2021, 14:03 UTC≈9,300 viewsread 7 August 2026

ВЫВОДЫ ПОСЛЕ ТУРЦИИ Быстрые. https://ru.motorsport.com/f1/news/gran-pri-turtsii-pyat-bystrykh-vyvodov/6684433/

30 Sept 2021, 09:13 UTC≈9,660 viewsread 7 August 2026

КАТАР На Ближнем Востоке становится все меньше и меньше стран без контракта с организаторами Формулы 1. Самый плохо скрываемый секрет последних недель наконец перестал быть секретом – 19-21 ноября впервые в истории Ф1 состоится Гран При Катара. Финал сезона таким образом будет состоять из трех ближневосточных гонок подряд. Примечательно, что впервые с начала пандемии новый этап появился в календаре не временно. Фор

26 Sept 2021, 13:57 UTC≈8,120 viewsread 7 August 2026

Гран При России: пять быстрых выводов https://ru.motorsport.com/f1/news/gran-pri-rossii-pyat-bystrykh-vyvodov-6675260/6675260/

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @olegkarpovonf1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Dec 2021, 10:21 UTCAnonymous Poll2,880 voters approx.

Очень интересно, что вы думаете. Кто выиграет титул?

  1. Ферстаппен40%
  2. Хэмилтон60%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Aug 2021, 08:36 UTCAnonymous Poll2,830 voters approx.

Правильно ли было начислять очки после такой гонки в Бельгии?

  1. Да52%
  2. Нет48%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2021 to 13 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Paddock Live” (@olegkarpovonf1), 2,854 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olegkarpovonf1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.