Channel
@olecabubnit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,509subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001617003072 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @olecabubnit |
| Created | 30 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/olecabubnit |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 2,509 | +8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 2,501 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 2,501 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,066 |
| Reactions total | 3,169 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3,169 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5389109424382033728 | 807 | 25.5% | |
| custom 5370651905506698534 | 690 | 21.8% | |
| custom 5371074684907446025 | 654 | 20.6% | |
| custom 5373025411808652334 | 406 | 12.8% | |
| custom 5357594479077373784 | 401 | 12.7% | |
| custom 5397657375668718337 | 211 | 6.66% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,169reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @olecabubnit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
вы мне вчера наговорили приятного и я вас люблю сильно вот это вы все у меня в кармашках
custom 5370651905506698534131custom 537107468490744602534custom 538910942438203372832custom 53575944790773737845custom 53976573756687183373custom 53730254118086523341
на самом деле мне конечно оч приятно, но немного непонятно, когда вы мне пишите что вам нравится мой ахилл/одиссей/пенелопа/гермес/геракл и прочие, мне кажется они у меня такие.... базисные..... ну типа не в плохом смысле, п просто примерно такие же как у всех. поэтому я не очень понимаю что я такого нарисовала что вам прям запал именно МОЙ дизайн с минорными изменениями от остальных
custom 5357594479077373784122custom 539765737566871833730custom 537107468490744602523custom 53706519055066985344custom 53891094243820337283custom 53730254118086523341
никак не доходили руки доделать какой то жучиный хуман скетч, все, в ближайшее время больше не буду вас мучить жуками и дальше снова много грекоф
custom 5371074684907446025145custom 538910942438203372848custom 537302541180865233436custom 53575944790773737846custom 53976573756687183376custom 53706519055066985342
обновления по поводу вашей олецы: мне немного лучше. не знаю, могу ли я рисовать, я боюсь брать в руки перо после перерыва, но морально мне правда немного полегче. стараюсь потихоньку приводить свою жизнь в порядок, играю в игры, навожу дома порядки. фоновая тревога все еще есть, но ощутимо меньше всех люблю всех обняла
custom 5389109424382033728135custom 537302541180865233451custom 537107468490744602539custom 537065190550669853416custom 53976573756687183373custom 53575944790773737841
стараюсь делать хоть что то хотя бы минимально
custom 5371074684907446025193custom 537065190550669853453custom 538910942438203372849custom 539765737566871833720custom 53575944790773737844custom 53730254118086523343
моя часть работы в коллаб с твисс и другими чудесными художниками а оригинал со всеми работами всех ребят вы можете заценить у твисс на канале - https://t.me/twesssis
custom 5370651905506698534217custom 539765737566871833754custom 537107468490744602544custom 53575944790773737845custom 53891094243820337285custom 53730254118086523342
подвиг геракла по получению пояса ипполиты, царицы амазонок, очень меня смешит. по более ранним версиям геракл просто убивает ее, и забирает вещь, но по более поздним трактовкам ипполита становится супругой тесея, которого геракл на кой то ляд потащил в этот поход с собой короче вот так они добывали пояс я считаю
custom 5373025411808652334198custom 537065190550669853464custom 538910942438203372846custom 535759447907737378414custom 53710746849074460253custom 53976573756687183373
не могу короче дольше это откладывать, я правда очень устала у меня видимо какое-то выгоранием хз, поэтому на канале пока побудет вот эта некрасивая плашка извините что подвела, но я вообще не могу перо держать в руках, я ненавижу себя каждую секунду и когда рисую это чувство только усиливается, и я совсем не понимаю что с этим простите что так получается
custom 5370651905506698534161custom 538910942438203372834custom 537302541180865233429custom 537107468490744602514custom 53976573756687183372custom 53575944790773737841
штука в коллаб закончена, хз когда вы ее увидите но увидите обязательно
custom 5389109424382033728191custom 537302541180865233453custom 535759447907737378443custom 53976573756687183375custom 53706519055066985341custom 53710746849074460251
жукоскетчевая подборка пока я ебашу коллабу проебав все дедлайны какие были
custom 5389109424382033728136custom 535759447907737378435custom 537107468490744602529custom 53976573756687183378custom 53706519055066985343custom 53730254118086523341
ну сюжет paris the musical короче
custom 5371074684907446025112custom 539765737566871833731custom 535759447907737378422custom 53730254118086523344custom 53891094243820337282
ахилл придумывает дисс на агамемнона а патрокл битбоксит ему на фоне
custom 5357594479077373784142custom 539765737566871833741custom 537065190550669853432custom 53730254118086523343custom 53710746849074460252custom 53891094243820337281
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @olecabubnit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 201,239 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“олеца бубнит 18+ | рест” (@olecabubnit), 2,509 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olecabubnit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.