ребята, у меня сейчас капец с впн, если я пропаду, значит сдох, и я ищу новый( вообщем постараюсь быть на связи, но не знаю. #оку
❤4🔥2😢1

Channel
@okuocc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
61subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004376970068 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @okuocc |
| Description | ⲇ𐔖ⳝρ𐔖 ᥒ𐔖ⲿᥲ᥈𐔖ⲃᥲⲧь ⲏᥲ ⲙ𐔖ύ ⲕᥲⲏᥲ᥈! ⲧ𐔤ⲧ ⲏᥲύⲇᥱⲧᥱ: -ᥲρⲧы -υⲏⲧᥱρᥲⲕⲧυⲃы -ᥲρⲧ-υⲃᥱⲏⲧы -ᥲⲏυⲙᥲцυυ ᥲρⲧ ⲏᥲ ᥲⲃᥱ ⲏᥲρυᥴ𐔖ⲃᥲⲏ: @unaandakinava |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 2 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/okuocc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 61 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 61 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (2 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,133 |
| Reactions total | 85 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
85 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 67 | 78.8% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 8.24% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 4.71% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.35% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 2.35% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.18% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.18% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.18% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ребята, у меня сейчас капец с впн, если я пропаду, значит сдох, и я ищу новый( вообщем постараюсь быть на связи, но не знаю. #оку
❤4🔥2😢1
ⲃⲧ𐔖ρ𐔖ύ 𐔤ɥᥲᥴⲧⲏυⲕ ᥴ𐔖ρᥲ 𐔖ⲕ𐔤: 𐔖ⲏᥲ ⲙυ᥈ᥲя… υ ⲧ𐔖ⲿᥱ ᥴᥒ𐔖ⲕ𐔖ύⲏᥲя, я ⳝы ᥴ ⲏᥱύ ᥒ𐔖ⳅⲏᥲⲕ𐔖ⲙυ᥈ᥲᥴь, ᥱᥴ᥈υ 𐔖ⲏᥲ ⲏᥱ ᥒρ𐔖ⲧυⲃ. ⲕᥲύⲧ𐔖: 𐔖ⲏᥲ ⲃы𐔏᥈яⲇυⲧ 𐔖ɥᥱⲏь ⲕρ𐔤ⲧ𐔖! υ я ᥈юⳝ᥈ю 𐔤ᥒᥱρⲧыⲭ ᥈юⲇᥱύ, ɥⲧ𐔖 ⲙ𐔖𐔏𐔤ⲧ 𐔖ⲧᥴⲧ𐔖яⲧь ᥴⲃ𐔖ᥱ ⲙⲏᥱⲏυᥱ!) ⲕᥲ𐔏ᥱ: 𐔏ᥱρ𐔖ύ, ⲫ𐔤. яⲙυ: ⲃы𐔏᥈яⲇυⲧ ⲏ𐔖ρⲙᥲ᥈ьⲏ𐔖, ⲏ𐔖 ⲧρᥲⲧυⲧ ᥴⲃ𐔖ύ ⲧᥲ᥈ᥲⲏⲧ ⲏᥲ 𐔏ᥱρ𐔖υⳅⲙ. ᥴᥒᥲᥴυⳝ𐔖 ⳅᥲ 𐔤ɥᥲᥴⲧυᥱ!! !!ᥒρ𐔖ɯ𐔤 ⲏᥱ 𐔖ⳝυⲿᥲⲧьᥴя ⲏᥲ ⲙⲏᥱⲏυᥱ ⲙ𐔖υⲭ ᥒᥱρᥴ𐔖ⲏᥲⲿᥱύ!!
🕊2❤1💯1
кхм… извините, вчера не могла продолжить интерактив, день забитый был, утром правда продолжу. #оку
❤4👏2
привет, это списочек моих любимых фп> (тут не по местам!!) крд: кедзи/конэко💖❤💋🤍😳 хиро хаяши оку аи мицаку миури андо юри луна изуми хитоми/мио тихиро/акира касуми минами сами мизуми мизу микото макото орлиха/хироши лия аматэрасу скара минами кея азуми хошико хаяко Аюна фисташка сизумэ Рю ханако хато @AntonioMemie (имя забыл сорр) хоми мана ито акито мга: оку рëмэ лис ямицуру броо!! мейкуйо акимэ кирилл кого всп…
❤1
ребят, с интерактивом продолжу завтра наверное, сегодня не успеваю( #оку
❤6🥰1
ВАС 60 СПАСИБОО!!) #оку
❤4🔥1
ᥒᥱρⲃыύ 𐔤ɥᥲᥴⲧⲏυⲕ 𐔖᥈υⲃᥱρ 𐔖ⲕ𐔤: ⲃы𐔏᥈яⲇυⲧ ⲙυ᥈ыⲙ. ⲇᥲ υ 𐔖ⲭ𐔖ⲧⲏυⲕ. ⲕᥲύⲧ𐔖: 𐔖ⲏ ⲧᥲⲕ𐔖ύ ⲭ𐔖ρ𐔖ɯυύ, ⲇᥲ υ ⲃы𐔏᥈яⲇυⲧ, ⲕᥲⲕ ⲕρ𐔖᥈υⲕ! я ⳝы ᥒ𐔖ⲇρ𐔤ⲿυ᥈ᥴя ᥴ ⲏυⲙ!! ⲕᥲ𐔏ᥱ: 𐔖ɥᥱρᥱⲇⲏ𐔖ύ 𐔖ⲭ𐔖ⲧⲏυⲕ. ⲫ𐔤, ⲇᥲⲿᥱ 𐔏𐔖ⲃ𐔖ρυⲧь ⲏυɥᥱ𐔏𐔖 ⲏᥱ ⳝ𐔤ⲇ𐔤. яⲙυ: 𐔖ⲭ𐔖ⲧⲏυⲕ, ᥲ ⲃρ𐔖ⲇᥱ υ ⲏᥱ 𐔖ⲭ𐔖ⲧⲏυⲕ… ᥴⲧρᥲⲏⲏыύ. ᥴᥒᥲᥴυⳝ𐔖 ⳅᥲ 𐔤ɥᥲᥴⲧυᥱ!! !!ᥒρ𐔖ɯ𐔤 ⲏᥱ 𐔖ⳝυⲿᥲⲧьᥴя ⲏᥲ ⲙⲏᥱⲏυᥱ ⲙ𐔖υⲭ ᥒᥱρᥴ𐔖ⲏᥲⲿᥱύ!!
❤4
₊⊹ 𝑜𝓀𝓊|𝑜𝒸 ₊⊹ pinned a photo
плюс, мне очень понравился стиль и я буду рисовать своих любимых ос, так что ждите, может вы станете моей жертвой…) и мне больше нравится этот стиль(если это можно так назвать?) #оку
❤6🔥1
утром начну, а так поближе покажу дизайн моей 4) кто вам больше всех нравится? #оку
❤5
υⲏⲧᥱρᥲⲕⲧυⲃ 𐔖ⲧ 𐔖ⲕ𐔤 ᥴ𐔤ⲧь: ⲕᥲⲕ ⲙ𐔖ύ ᥒᥱρᥴ𐔖ⲏᥲⲿ ⳝ𐔤ⲇᥱⲧ 𐔖ⲧⲏ𐔖ᥴυⲧьᥴя ⲕ ⲃᥲɯᥱⲙ𐔤. ⲙ𐔖υ ᥒᥱρᥴ𐔖ⲏᥲⲿυ: -𐔖ⲕ𐔤 -ⲕᥲύⲧ𐔖 -яⲙυ -ⲕᥲ𐔏ᥱ ɥⲧ𐔖 ⲏ𐔤ⲿⲏ𐔖 ⲇ᥈я 𐔤ɥᥲᥴⲧυя: -ρᥱᥒ𐔖ᥴⲧ ⲃ ⲃᥲɯ ⲧ𐔏ⲕ(պᥒ+50)/3 ⲇρ𐔤ⳅьяⲙ(ᥱᥴ᥈υ ⲏᥱⲧ𐔤 ⲧ𐔏ⲕ) -ᥒ𐔖ⲇᥒυᥴⲕᥲ ⲏᥲ ⲙ𐔖ύ ⲕᥲⲏᥲ᥈, ⳝᥱⳅ ⲇᥲ᥈ьⲏᥱύɯᥱύ 𐔖ⲧᥒυᥴⲕυ -ᥴⲕυⲏ𐔤ⲧь ⲃᥲɯᥱ𐔏𐔖 ᥒᥱρᥴ𐔖ⲏᥲⲿᥲ, ᥱ𐔏𐔖 ᥲⲏⲕᥱⲧ𐔤, υⳅ ⲕᥲⲕ𐔖𐔏𐔖 ⲫⲇ(ⲕρⲇ/ⲙ𐔏ᥲ) - (ⲉⲧ𐔖 2 ⲫⲇ, 𐔏ⲇᥱ 𐔖ⲏυ ᥒρ𐔖ᥒυᥴᥲⲏы) ⳅᥲρᥲⲏᥱᥱ ᥴᥒᥲᥴυⳝ𐔖 ⳅᥲ 𐔤ɥᥲᥴⲧυᥱ!!)
🍓4❤3🔥3
потом либо разыграю её, либо продам(если купят)) #оку
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @okuocc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
какая версия лучше?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 278,493 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“₊⊹ 𝑜𝓀𝓊|𝑜𝒸 ₊⊹” (@okuocc), 61 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/okuocc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.