Channel
@oksana_keratin_studio
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
119subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002255389709 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oksana_keratin_studio |
| Created | Between 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oksana_keratin_studio |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 119 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 120 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 121 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 118 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 118 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 10 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
21 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5287241540379371824 | 10 | 47.6% | |
| custom 5411346205240207972 | 3 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5219865774226687360 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| custom 5287761514890028635 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| custom 5215683386613448510 | 1 | 4.76% | |
| custom 5220102491349203995 | 1 | 4.76% | |
| custom 5305669050318220928 | 1 | 4.76% | |
| custom 5449532098043982062 | 1 | 4.76% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
дорогие, доброго вам вечера 💗 я к вам с бомбезной рекомендацией, кто давно хочет поменять уход но не знает что купить, сильно советую этот набор, шампунь шикарно очищает волосы, а бальзам просто пушка, волосы настоящий шелк, я редко что то рекомендую, но тут не могла вас оставить без этого комбо, цена за литр, купить можно в золотом яблоке 🛍️ ваша Ксю 💋
custom 52872415403793718246custom 54495320980439820621
твой идеальный кератин pinned a photo
роскошный блонд 🪩
custom 52156833866134485101
график 💗💗💗💗💗💗 https://dikidi.net/1457876
дорогие, на завтра освободилось окошко на 14.00
график 💗💗💗💗 https://dikidi.net/1457876
3 окошка на июнь осталось 🌸 https://dikidi.ru/1457876
качественный блонд это реально)
🌸 дорогие, в этом месяце осталось 6 окошек, кому нужно разбирайте, ссылка выше 👆
график 💗💗💗💗 https://dikidi.ru/1457876
ну какова красота 😍
custom 52872415403793718241
балуете меня 🫂
custom 52877615148900286352custom 52201024913492039951custom 53056690503182209281
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @oksana_keratin_studio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“твой идеальный кератин” (@oksana_keratin_studio), 119 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oksana_keratin_studio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.