4 measurements spanning 11 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,148–1,172 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Aug 2026, 01:12
1,151
-5
14 Aug 2026, 17:14
1,156
-13
7 Aug 2026, 23:32
1,169
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:15
1,169
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.88%
avg views ÷ 1,151 subscribers
Avg views / post
90.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held
11 (26 June 2026 – 29 July 2026)
Views total
272
Reactions total
35
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 22s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
143 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5262562894519760795
75
52.4%
custom 5310285903938219421
68
47.6%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 11 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @okolobeauty_blog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
в редкие свободные минуты я продолжаю поглощать детективные истории о Корморане Страйке 📝
недавно закончила "Шелкопряда" и честно говоря, вторая книга серии сюжетно понравилась мне чуть меньше первой - персонажи здесь по большей части неприятные и не вызывающие сочувствия, поэтому читалось как-то отстраненно, но интрига как обычно сохранялась до конца 👍
в третьей книге "На службе зла" завязка сразу цепляет - в этот…
🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️
я снова погрузилась в бытовые дела, но уход за собой в расписании присутствует несмотря ни на что)
недавно я рассказывала, что начала посещать зал) решила, что это отличный повод попробовать новый уход в тревел-формате…
выбор остановила на профессиональном бренде космецевтики родом из Владивостока - FORMULA Dr. Lyuter, который я в очередной раз подсмотрела у блогеров-косметологов 🆕
в состав тре…
июль для меня оказался месяцем новых начинаний❤️
до последнего я откладывала тренировки в зале, но все обстоятельства сложились так, что на ближайший месяц я оказалась тут… и мне даже понравилось)
в сравнении с домашними тренировками в зале конечно гораздо больше возможностей и в целом удобнее заниматься - не тратишь время на раскручивание и сборку гантелей, но я пока без помощи дежурного тренера к тренажерам подхо…
🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️
как ваши дела?
оказывается уже половина лета позади, даже не верится 🫢
в июле я наконец закрыла один свой давний гештальт - добавила в активность утренние пробежки, а на прошлых выходных даже пробежала свой первый забег на 5 км 😍
результатом я более чем довольна, средний темп 5:59 и серединка такая по результату в категории - 108 место из 316, считаю, что для такой небольшой подготовки очень не…
летние парф-обновки💧
я уже рассказывала про наше первое знакомство с брендом Zielinski & Rozen, оно оказалось очень удачным - выбранную парочку ароматов мы с мужем активно носили, по стойкости и шлейфу впечатление оказалось исключительно позитивное❤️
муж флакончик Oakmoss & Amber использовал до конца, а я свою дымную полынь отложила до прихода холодов, летом она звучит тяжело и неуместно)
в жару идеально носился Bl…
любопытно, что некоторые инфлюенсеры в этом году начали переходить на силовой тренинг с пилатеса и легкого фитнеса, этот тренд не может не радовать))
незаметно так прошло полгода как я регулярно тренируюсь и контролирую питание) оказалось, что самая крутая мотивация для меня (помимо страха саркопении)) - это результат, который видишь и не хочешь терять 😍
👉 если в цифрах, то на сегодня ушло 13 кг и 8% жира (отслежив…
монораспаковка нового ухода 📦
как-то в один момент у меня закончилась почти вся уходовая база…🫢
и я решила, что это классный повод протестировать сразу несколько продуктов от M.Aklive, давно слежу за брендом и их новинками, почитываю разборы на каналах косметологов - составы у баночек понятные и эффективные, а я такое особенно ценю❤️
для первого знакомства заказала три средства⬇️
🔴интенсивно очищающий гель с кислот…
неочевидный, но приятный бонус от тренировок для меня - это очищение головы от мыслительного потока на целый час 😍
мне просто не хватает оперативки, чтобы параллельно с подсчетом повторений / подходов, контролем техники и дыхания думать о чём-то ещё и о боже, как это прекрасно 😍
в отпуске кстати удалось не выйти из режима - тренировки были по плану, шаги как-то сами собой нахаживались по 15-20 тыс в день, а на швед…
я человек простой - жалуюсь, что устала писать про банки и снова пишу про них)) 🫢
но отпускные банки на канале я ещё не показывала, потому что и отпуска, кроме декретного, у нас давненько не случалось)) а в этом году мы решились на первую поездку к морю с сыном❤️
для защиты от солнышка брала с собой несколько средств⬇️
🔴MEDICUBE Collagen Firming Sun Cream SPF 50 - крем с легким персиковым оттенком и сияющим финише…
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @okolobeauty_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 498,339 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ОКОЛОБЬЮТИ” (@okolobeauty_blog), 1,151 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/okolobeauty_blog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
