Channel
@oknigahikino
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
267subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001541979620 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oknigahikino |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oknigahikino |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 19:02 | 267 | +10 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 257 | -2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 259 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:01 | 261 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 262 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 261 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:23 | 261 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 19 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
41 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 68.3% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 17.1% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 7.32% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 17 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Итак, я решила поиграться в толкователя образов и символов (люблю это дело). А вас приглашаю, к дискуссии, к спору и к обсуждению.👉⤵️ *это дело я тоже люблю)
❤4🔥1
Signed Анеля Алтынова
Ну и для настроения - "Грозовой перевал", Кейт Буш. P.S.: правда, сцены, которая стала сюжетом для песни (когда Кэти возвращается призраком в Грозовой перевал и стучит в окна к Хитклифу) в экранизации нет.
❤5💔2👍1
Signed Анеля Алтынова
Итак, мы посмотрели "Грозовой перевал" и... я в полном восторге!!!! Возможно, мои впечатления спасли заниженные ожидания - я начиталась по большей части негативных отзывов, и прям ждала, как буду сидеть в зале и понимающе кивать на все "промахи" режиссёра, о которых успела прочитать в рецензиях. Во-вторых, у меня не было никаких определённых ожиданий - я не ждала ни соответствия роману, ни горячих сцен (их тоже раз…
❤4🔥1
Signed Анеля Алтынова
В (нео)нуарном полку прибыло! Ребят, я тут поняла, что есть замечательный режиссёр Кэтрин Бигелоу, а я у нее ничего кроме "На гребне волны" не смотрела. Пошла по фильмографии и наткнулась на фильм, который определили как киберпанк (такое мы любим!). В итоге, киберпанка там мышь наплакала, а вот неонуара - с горочкой (а такое мы любим ещё больше). Красивый, стильный, мрачный, романтичный, да ещё и с Райфом Файнсом …
❤7👏2🔥2
Signed Анеля Алтынова
Так хорошо посидели вчера книжным клубом нашим прекрасным. Обсуждали повесть Маркеса "Хронику объявленной смерти" (потрясающая вещица), но говорили как всегда обо всём от Муми троллей до Чужого (который Alien). А главный участник клуба, очевидно, в правом нижнем углу - с трёх недель Лисенок ходит почти на все встречи. Н - наследие.
❤8🔥3👏1
Signed Анеля Алтынова
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @oknigahikino. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Книги, кино и блогинг @anelie_a” (@oknigahikino), 267 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oknigahikino.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.